The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Isotopic signatures of N2O produced by ammonia-oxidizing archaea from soils
Open accessAbstract
N2O gas is involved in global warming and ozone depletion. The major sources of N2O are soil microbial processes. Anthropogenic inputs into the nitrogen cycle have exacerbated these microbial processes, including nitrification. Ammonia-oxidizing archaea (AOA) are major members of the pool of soil ammonia-oxidizing microorganisms. This study investigated the isotopic signatures of N2O produced by soil AOA and associated N2O production processes. All five AOA strains (I.1a, I.1a-associated and I.1b clades of Thaumarchaeota) from soil produced N2O and their yields were comparable to those of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria (AOB). The levels of site preference (SP), δ15Nbulk and δ18O -N2O of soil AOA strains were 13–30%, −13 to −35% and 22–36%, respectively, and strains MY1–3 and other soil AOA strains had distinct isotopic signatures. A 15N-NH4+-labeling experiment indicated that N2O originated from two different production pathways (that is, ammonia oxidation and nitrifier denitrification), which suggests that the isotopic signatures of N2O from AOA may be attributable to the relative contributions of these two processes. The highest N2O production yield and lowest site preference of acidophilic strain CS may be related to enhanced nitrifier denitrification for detoxifying nitrite. Previously, it was not possible to detect N2O from soil AOA because of similarities between its isotopic signatures and those from AOB. Given the predominance of AOA over AOB in most soils, a significant proportion of the total N2O emissions from soil nitrification may be attributable to AOA.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Hu, H.-W., Chen, D., & He, J.-Z. (2015) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1093/femsre/fuv021 · Cited by 800
Hink, L., Gubry-Rangin, C., Nicol, G. W., & Prosser, J. I. (2018) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/s41396-017-0025-5 · Cited by 406
Kozlowski, J. A., Stieglmeier, M., Schleper, C., Klotz, M. G., & Stein, L. Y. (2016) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/ismej.2016.2 · Cited by 389
Wei, J., Zhou, M., Vereecken, H., & Brüggemann, N. (2017) · Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry · doi:10.1002/rcm.7912 · Cited by 18
Pannu, M. W., Meinhardt, K. A., Bertagnolli, A., Fransen, S. C., Stahl, D. A., & Strand, S. E. (2019) · Environmental Microbiology Reports · doi:10.1111/1758-2229.12790 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Jung, M.-Y., Well, R., Min, D., Giesemann, A., Park, S.-J., Kim, J.-G., Kim, S.-J., & Rhee, S.-K.
- Venue
- The ISME Journal
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2013-11-14
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1115-1125
- ISSN
- 1751-7362 (ISSN-L)
- 1751-7370
- OpenAlex
- W2041464098
- Cited by
- 197
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 19.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Isotopic signatures of N2O produced by ammonia-oxidizing archaea from soils. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/ismej.2013.205
- The paper
- Jung, M.-Y., Well, R., Min, D., Giesemann, A., Park, S.-J., Kim, J.-G., Kim, S.-J., & Rhee, S.-K. (2014). Isotopic signatures of N2O produced by ammonia-oxidizing archaea from soils. The ISME Journal. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2013.205
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.