The DOI matches its Crossref record; 61 of the 61 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Contribution of neutral processes to the assembly of gut microbial communities in the zebrafish over host development
Open accessAbstract
Despite their importance to host health and development, the communities of microorganisms associated with humans and other animals are characterized by a large degree of unexplained variation across individual hosts. The processes that drive such inter-individual variation are not well understood. To address this, we surveyed the microbial communities associated with the intestine of the zebrafish, Danio rerio, over developmental time. We compared our observations of community composition and distribution across hosts with that predicted by a neutral assembly model, which assumes that community assembly is driven solely by chance and dispersal. We found that as hosts develop from larvae to adults, the fit of the model to observed microbial distributions decreases, suggesting that the relative importance of non-neutral processes, such as microbe-microbe interactions, active dispersal, or selection by the host, increases as hosts mature. We also observed that taxa which depart in their distributions from the neutral prediction form ecologically distinct sub-groups, which are phylogenetically clustered with respect to the full metacommunity. These results demonstrate that neutral processes are sufficient to generate substantial variation in microbiota composition across individual hosts, and suggest that potentially unique or important taxa may be identified by their divergence from neutral distributions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
R Core Team (2025) · doi:10.32614/r.manuals · Cited by 352,181
An obesity-associated gut microbiome with increased capacity for energy harvest
Turnbaugh, P. J., Ley, R. E., Mahowald, M. A., Magrini, V., Mardis, E. R., & Gordon, J. I. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05414 · Cited by 12,444
Structure, function and diversity of the healthy human microbiome
The Human Microbiome Project Consortium (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11234 · Cited by 11,726
UniFrac: a New Phylogenetic Method for Comparing Microbial Communities
Lozupone, C., & Knight, R. (2005) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.71.12.8228-8235.2005 · Cited by 8,227
Human gut microbiome viewed across age and geography
Yatsunenko, T., Rey, F. E., Manary, M. J., Trehan, I., Dominguez-Bello, M. G., Contreras, M., Magris, M., Hidalgo, G., Baldassano, R. N., Anokhin, A. P., et al. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11053 · Cited by 7,815
SPECIES ASSEMBLAGES AND INDICATOR SPECIES:THE NEED FOR A FLEXIBLE ASYMMETRICAL APPROACH
Dufrêne, M., & Legendre, P. (1997) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.1890/0012-9615(1997)067[0345:saaist]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 7,431
The Unified Neutral Theory of Biodiversity and Biogeography
Jetschke, G. (2002) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[1771:tuntob]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 6,993
Picante: R tools for integrating phylogenies and ecology
Kembel, S. W., Cowan, P. D., Helmus, M. R., Cornwell, W. K., Morlon, H., Ackerly, D. D., Blomberg, S. P., & Webb, C. O. (2010) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btq166 · Cited by 6,243
Conservation evaluation and phylogenetic diversity
Faith, D. P. (1992) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/0006-3207(92)91201-3 · Cited by 5,693
The metacommunity concept: a framework for multi‐scale community ecology
Leibold, M. A., Holyoak, M., Mouquet, N., Amarasekare, P., Chase, J. M., Hoopes, M. F., Holt, R. D., Shurin, J. B., Law, R., Tilman, D., et al. (2004) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00608.x · Cited by 5,391
Cited by
Stochastic Community Assembly: Does It Matter in Microbial Ecology?
Zhou, J., & Ning, D. (2017) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.00002-17 · Cited by 2,773
A general framework for quantitatively assessing ecological stochasticity
Ning, D., Deng, Y., Tiedje, J. M., & Zhou, J. (2019) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1904623116 · Cited by 1,255
Jiao, S., Yang, Y., Xu, Y., Zhang, J., & Lu, Y. (2020) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/s41396-019-0522-9 · Cited by 1,052
Chen, W., Ren, K., Isabwe, A., Chen, H., Liu, M., & Yang, J. (2019) · Microbiome · doi:10.1186/s40168-019-0749-8 · Cited by 804
Role of priority effects in the early-life assembly of the gut microbiota
Sprockett, D., Fukami, T., & Relman, D. A. (2018) · Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology · doi:10.1038/nrgastro.2017.173 · Cited by 419
Metadata
- Authors
- Burns, A. R., Stephens, W. Z., Stagaman, K., Wong, S., Rawls, J. F., Guillemin, K., & Bohannan, B. J. M.
- Venue
- The ISME Journal
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2015-08-21
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 655-664
- ISSN
- 1751-7362 (ISSN-L)
- 1751-7370
- OpenAlex
- W1130588615
- Cited by
- 939
- References
- 61
- FWCI
- 12.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Contribution of neutral processes to the assembly of gut microbial communities in the zebrafish over host development. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/ismej.2015.142
- The paper
- Burns, A. R., Stephens, W. Z., Stagaman, K., Wong, S., Rawls, J. F., Guillemin, K., & Bohannan, B. J. M. (2016). Contribution of neutral processes to the assembly of gut microbial communities in the zebrafish over host development. The ISME Journal. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2015.142
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
