Cited by 101Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive PhysiologyGut microbiota and healthAnaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production

Divergent functional isoforms drive niche specialisation for nutrient acquisition and use in rumen microbiome

Open access
Rubino, Francesco, Carberry, Ciara, Waters, Sinéad M, Kenny, David, McCabe, Matthew S, Creevey, Christopher J·2017·The ISME Journal

Abstract

Many microbes in complex competitive environments share genes for acquiring and utilising nutrients, questioning whether niche specialisation exists and if so, how it is maintained. We investigated the genomic signatures of niche specialisation in the rumen microbiome, a highly competitive, anaerobic environment, with limited nutrient availability determined by the biomass consumed by the host. We generated individual metagenomic libraries from 14 cows fed an ad libitum diet of grass silage and calculated functional isoform diversity for each microbial gene identified. The animal replicates were used to calculate confidence intervals to test for differences in diversity of functional isoforms between microbes that may drive niche specialisation. We identified 153 genes with significant differences in functional isoform diversity between the two most abundant bacterial genera in the rumen (Prevotella and Clostridium). We found Prevotella possesses a more diverse range of isoforms capable of degrading hemicellulose, whereas Clostridium for cellulose. Furthermore, significant differences were observed in key metabolic processes indicating that isoform diversity plays an important role in maintaining their niche specialisation. The methods presented represent a novel approach for untangling complex interactions between microorganisms in natural environments and have resulted in an expanded catalogue of gene targets central to rumen cellulosic biomass degradation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ismej.2016.172

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 71 · Cited by 101

Authors
Rubino, F., Carberry, C., Waters, S. M., Kenny, D., McCabe, M. S., & Creevey, C. J.
Affiliations
  • Teagasc - The Irish Agriculture and Food Development Authority (IE)
  • University College Dublin (IE)
  • Aberystwyth University (GB)
Corresponding author
Creevey, Christopher J
Venue
The ISME Journal
Published
2017-01-13
Volume
11
Issue
4
Pages
932-944
ISSN
  • 1751-7362 (ISSN-L)
  • 1751-7370
OpenAlex
W2577373560
Cited by
101
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 3
FWCI
15.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2017-05-16)
Open access
Locations
  • The ISME Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • T-Stór (Teagasc) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Funders
  • European Commission (266018)
  • Science Foundation Ireland (07/SK/B1236a)
  • Teagasc
  • Directorate for Biological Sciences
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/E/W/10964A01, BBS/E/W/10964A01A)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
Keywords
rumen microbiome, ecological specialization, nutrient acquisition, Prevotella, Clostridium, hemicellulose degradation, cellulose degradation, grass silage, metagenomics
MeSH terms
Animals, Bacteria, Cattle, Digestion, Female, Rumen, Bacterial Physiological Phenomena, Metagenomics, Microbiota

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review