The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 57 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cigarette smoking and the oral microbiome in a large study of American adults
Open accessAbstract
Oral microbiome dysbiosis is associated with oral disease and potentially with systemic diseases; however, the determinants of these microbial imbalances are largely unknown. In a study of 1204 US adults, we assessed the relationship of cigarette smoking with the oral microbiome. 16S rRNA gene sequencing was performed on DNA from oral wash samples, sequences were clustered into operational taxonomic units (OTUs) using QIIME and metagenomic content was inferred using PICRUSt. Overall oral microbiome composition differed between current and non-current (former and never) smokers (P<0.001). Current smokers had lower relative abundance of the phylum Proteobacteria (4.6%) compared with never smokers (11.7%) (false discovery rate q=5.2 × 10−7), with no difference between former and never smokers; the depletion of Proteobacteria in current smokers was also observed at class, genus and OTU levels. Taxa not belonging to Proteobacteria were also associated with smoking: the genera Capnocytophaga, Peptostreptococcus and Leptotrichia were depleted, while Atopobium and Streptococcus were enriched, in current compared with never smokers. Functional analysis from inferred metagenomes showed that bacterial genera depleted by smoking were related to carbohydrate and energy metabolism, and to xenobiotic metabolism. Our findings demonstrate that smoking alters the oral microbiome, potentially leading to shifts in functional pathways with implications for smoking-related diseases.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Such dysbiosis is prompted by various factors, including host diet, inflammatory responses, systemic disruptions, and habits such as alcohol intake, smoking tobacco and consuming alcohol.50, 180, 181, 182, 183, 184, 185, 186”
From The oral microbiome: Role of key organisms and complex networks in oral health and disease (2021) · cites this paper as [185]
Citations
Cites
Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2
Love, M. I., Huber, W., & Anders, S. (2014) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8 · Cited by 95,106
QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data
Caporaso, J. G., Kuczynski, J., Stombaugh, J., Bittinger, K., Bushman, F. D., Costello, E. K., Fierer, N., Peña, A. G., Goodrich, J. K., Gordon, J. I., et al. (2010) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.f.303 · Cited by 34,887
Predictive functional profiling of microbial communities using 16S rRNA marker gene sequences
Langille, M. G. I., Zaneveld, J., Caporaso, J. G., McDonald, D., Knights, D., Reyes, J. A., Clemente, J. C., Burkepile, D. E., Vega Thurber, R. L., Knight, R., et al. (2013) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2676 · Cited by 9,116
IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans
Zuckerman, A. J. (1995) · Journal of Clinical Pathology · doi:10.1136/jcp.48.7.691-a · Cited by 8,766
KEGG for integration and interpretation of large-scale molecular data sets
Kanehisa, M., Goto, S., Sato, Y., Furumichi, M., & Tanabe, M. (2012) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkr988 · Cited by 4,848
FITTING MULTIVARIATE MODELS TO COMMUNITY DATA: A COMMENT ON DISTANCE-BASED REDUNDANCY ANALYSIS
McArdle, B. H., & Anderson, M. J. (2001) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2001)082[0290:fmmtcd]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 4,001
Chimeric 16S rRNA sequence formation and detection in Sanger and 454-pyrosequenced PCR ampliconsPreprint
Haas, B. J., Gevers, D., Earl, A. M., Feldgarden, M., Ward, D. V., Giannoukos, G., Ciulla, D., Tabbaa, D., Highlander, S. K., Sodergren, E. J., et al. (2011) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.112730.110 · Cited by 3,527
Dewhirst, F. E., Chen, T., Izard, J., Paster, B. J., Tanner, A. C. R., Yu, W.-H., Lakshmanan, A., & Wade, W. G. (2010) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.00542-10 · Cited by 3,352
Waste Not, Want Not: Why Rarefying Microbiome Data Is Inadmissible
McMurdie, P. J., & Holmes, S. (2014) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003531 · Cited by 3,034
UniFrac: an effective distance metric for microbial community comparison
Lozupone, C., Lladser, M. E., Knights, D., Stombaugh, J., & Knight, R. (2011) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/ismej.2010.133 · Cited by 2,825
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Patterson, 1996, Medical Microbiology
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The oral microbiome – an update for oral healthcare professionals
Kilian, M., Chapple, I. L. C., Hannig, M., Marsh, P. D., Meuric, V., Pedersen, A. M. L., Tonetti, M. S., Wade, W. G., & Zaura, E. (2016) · British Dental Journal · doi:10.1038/sj.bdj.2016.865 · Cited by 1,269
Stress and stability: applying the Anna Karenina principle to animal microbiomes
Zaneveld, J. R., McMinds, R., & Vega Thurber, R. (2017) · Nature Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nmicrobiol.2017.121 · Cited by 977
Fan, X., Alekseyenko, A. V., Wu, J., Peters, B. A., Jacobs, E. J., Gapstur, S. M., Purdue, M. P., Abnet, C. C., Stolzenberg-Solomon, R., Miller, G., et al. (2018) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2016-312580 · Cited by 702
“Cases were more likely to be current smokers in the PLCO cohort, and to consume more alcoholic beverages in the CPS II cohort.”
BackgroundMethodSelf-citationThe oral microbiome: Role of key organisms and complex networks in oral health and disease
Sedghi, L., DiMassa, V., Harrington, A., Lynch, S. V., & Kapila, Y. L. (2021) · Periodontology 2000 · doi:10.1111/prd.12393 · Cited by 755
Insights into the human oral microbiome
Verma, D., Garg, P. K., & Dubey, A. K. (2018) · Archives of Microbiology · doi:10.1007/s00203-018-1505-3 · Cited by 586
“Sensible food habits, stoppage of tobacco consumption and good oral hygiene assist in recovering the normal microbial diversity rapidly (Kilian et al. 2016; Wu et al. 2016).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Wu, J., Peters, B. A., Dominianni, C., Zhang, Y., Pei, Z., Yang, L., Ma, Y., Purdue, M. P., Jacobs, E. J., Gapstur, S. M., Li, H., Alekseyenko, A. V., Hayes, R. B., & Ahn, J.
- Affiliations
- NYU Langone Health (US)
- VA NY Harbor Healthcare System (US)
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research (CA)
- American Cancer Society (US)
- Medical University of South Carolina (US)
- Corresponding author
- Ahn, Jiyoung
- ORCID
- Venue
- The ISME Journal
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2016-03-25
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 2435-2446
- ISSN
- 1751-7362 (ISSN-L)
- 1751-7370
- PMC
- PMC5030690
- OpenAlex
- W2324897069
- Cited by
- 572
- References
- 57
- Citations by year
- 2026: 43 · 2025: 46 · 2024: 66 · 2023: 59 · 2022: 57 · 2021: 83 · 2020: 67 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 52 · 2017: 50 · 2016: 4
- FWCI
- 74.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- The ISME Journal (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- American Cancer Society
- U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
- National Institutes of Health
- National Cancer Institute (U01CA170948, R01CA159036, R21CA183887, R03CA159414, U01CA182370, R01CA164964, P30CA016087)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
- Health Sciences › Dentistry › General Dentistry › Oral Health Pathology and Treatment
- Keywords
- cigarette smoking, oral microbiota, dysbiosis, Proteobacteria, Capnocytophaga, Peptostreptococcus, Leptotrichia, Streptococcus, Atopobium, xenobiotic metabolism, carbohydrate metabolism, energy metabolism, smoking-related diseases
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Bacteria, Female, Humans, Male, Mouth, RNA, Ribosomal, 16S, Smoking, United States, Metagenome, Young Adult, Metagenomics, Microbiota, Dysbiosis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
