The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Brain Lactic Acidosis and Ischemic Cell Damage: 1. Biochemistry and Neurophysiology
Open accessAbstract
This study explores the influence of severe lactic acidosis in the ischemic rat brain on postischemic recovery of the tissue energy state and neurophysiological parameters. Severe incomplete brain ischemia (cerebral blood flow below 5% of normal) was induced by bilateral carotid artery clamping combined with hypovolemic hypotension. We varied the production of lactate in the tissue by manipulating the blood glucose concentrations. A 30-min period of incomplete ischemia induced in food-deprived animals caused lactate to accumulate to 15–16 μmol g−1 in cortical tissue. Upon recirculation these animals showed: (1) a considerable recovery of the cortical energy state as evaluated from the tissue concentrations of phosphocreatine, ATP, ADP, and AMP; and (2) return of spontaneous electrocortical activity as well as of somatosensory evoked response (SER). In contrast, administration of glucose to food-deprived animals prior to ischemia caused an increase in tissue lactate concentration to about 35 μmol g−1. These animals did not recover energy balance in the tissue and neurophysiological functions did not return. In other experiments the production of lactate during 30 min of complete compression ischemia was increased from about 12 μmol g−1 (normoglycemic animals) to 20–30 μmol g−1 by preischemic hyperglycemia and. in separate animals, combined hypercapnia. The recovery of the cortical energy state upon recirculation was significantly poorer in hyperglycemic animals. It is concluded that a high degree of tissue lactic acidosis during brain ischemia impairs postischemic recovery and that different degrees of tissue lactic acidosis may explain why severe incomplete ischemia, in certain experimental models, is more deleterious than complete brain ischemia.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Rodent models of cerebral ischemia.
Ginsberg, M. D., & Busto, R. (1989) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.20.12.1627 · Cited by 659
Oxygen radical mechanisms of brain injury following ischemia and reperfusion
Traystman, R. J., Kirsch, J. R., & Koehler, R. C. (1991) · Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1152/jappl.1991.71.4.1185 · Cited by 653
Weir, C. J., Murray, G. D., Dyker, A. G., & Lees, K. R. (1997) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.314.7090.1303 · Cited by 522
Li, J. Z., Vawter, M. P., Walsh, D. M., Tomita, H., Evans, S. J., Choudary, P. V., Lopez, J. F., Avelar, A., Shokoohi, V., Chung, T., et al. (2004) · Human Molecular Genetics · doi:10.1093/hmg/ddh065 · Cited by 261
Chapter 14 Cerebral vascular dysregulation in the ischemic brain
(2008) · Handbook of Clinical Neurology · doi:10.1016/s0072-9752(08)01914-3 · Cited by 98
Metadata
- Authors
- Rehncrona, S., Rosén, I., & Siesjö, B. K.
- Venue
- Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1981-09
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 297-311
- ISSN
- 0271-678X (ISSN-L)
- 1559-7016
- OpenAlex
- W2066349475
- Cited by
- 586
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 23.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Brain Lactic Acidosis and Ischemic Cell Damage: 1. Biochemistry and Neurophysiology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/jcbfm.1981.34
- The paper
- Rehncrona, S., Rosén, I., & Siesjö, B. K. (1981). Brain Lactic Acidosis and Ischemic Cell Damage: 1. Biochemistry and Neurophysiology. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism. https://doi.org/10.1038/jcbfm.1981.34
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.