The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Focal Cerebral Ischaemia in the Rat: 1. Description of Technique and Early Neuropathological Consequences following Middle Cerebral Artery Occlusion
Abstract
A procedure for occluding the stem of the proximal middle cerebral artery of the rat is described. The operation is performed under anaesthesia through a small subtemporal craniectomy. After occlusion, 3 animals were perfused with carbon black and 8 with a FAM fixative (40% formaldehyde, glacial acetic acid, and methanol). The findings were compared with sham-operated animals. Carbon black studies demonstrated an area of impaired perfusion corresponding to the territory of the occluded artery in each animal. Neuropathological studies invariably showed that there was ischaemic brain damage in the cortex and basal ganglia. The frontal cortex was involved in every animal, as was the lateral part of the neostriatum; the sensorimotor and auditory cortex were involved in most animals, whereas the occipital cortex and medial striatum were involved only infrequently. The damage produced by ischaemia could be readily distinguished from the small local lesion seen at the surgical site in sham-operated animals. The ability to produce a consistent focal ischaemic lesion in the rodent brain provides a technical approach that is sufficiently reproducible to enable investigation of the pathophysiology of ischaemia using recently developed autoradiographic and neurochemical methods.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Development of a Strain of Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats
OKAMOTO, K., & AOKI, K. (1963) · Japanese Circulation Journal · doi:10.1253/jcj.27.282 · Cited by 2,545
Cited by
Reversible middle cerebral artery occlusion without craniectomy in rats.
Longa, E. Z., Weinstein, P. R., Carlson, S., & Cummins, R. (1989) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.20.1.84 · Cited by 7,463
Ischemic Cell Death in Brain Neurons
Lipton, P. (1999) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.1999.79.4.1431 · Cited by 3,043
Bederson, J. B., Pitts, L. H., Tsuji, M., Nishimura, M. C., Davis, R. L., & Bartkowski, H. (1986) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.17.3.472 · Cited by 2,681
Viability thresholds and the penumbra of focal ischemia
Hossmann, K. (1994) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.410360404 · Cited by 1,370
Induction of reproducible brain infarction by photochemically initiated thrombosis
Watson, B. D., Dietrich, W. D., Busto, R., Wachtel, M. S., & Ginsberg, M. D. (1985) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.410170513 · Cited by 1,135
Metadata
- Authors
- Tamura, A., Graham, D. I., McCulloch, J., & Teasdale, G. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1981-03
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 53-60
- ISSN
- 0271-678X (ISSN-L)
- 1559-7016
- OpenAlex
- W2045835005
- Cited by
- 1,425
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.