The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Focal Brain Ischemia in the Rat: Methods for Reproducible Neocortical Infarction Using Tandem Occlusion of the Distal Middle Cerebral and Ipsilateral Common Carotid Arteries
Abstract
This article describes a 3-year experience with focal neocortical ischemia in three rat strains. Multiple groups of adult Wistar (n = 50), Fisher 344 (n = 31), and spontaneously hypertensive (n = 72) rats were subjected to permanent occlusion of the distal middle cerebral (MCA) and ipsilateral common carotid arteries (CCA). Twenty-four hours later the animals were killed, and frozen brain sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin to demarcate infarcted tissue. The infarct volume for each section was quantified with an image analyzer, and the total infarct volume was calculated with an iterative program that summed all interval volumes. Neocortical infarct volume was the largest and most reproducible in the spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR). Statistical power analysis to project the numbers of animals necessary to detect a 25 or 50% change in infarct volume with α = 0.05 and β = 0.2 revealed that only the SHR model was practical in terms of requisite animals: i.e., <10 animals per group. Tandem occlusion of the distal MCA and ipsilateral CCA in the SHR strain provides a surgically simple method for causing large neocortical infarcts with reproducible topography and volume. The interanimal variability in infarct volume that occurs even in the SHR strain dictates that randomized, concomitant controls are necessary in each study to ensure the accurate assessment of experimental manipulations or pharmacologic therapies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bederson, J. B., Pitts, L. H., Tsuji, M., Nishimura, M. C., Davis, R. L., & Bartkowski, H. (1986) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.17.3.472 · Cited by 2,681
Cited by
Ischemic Cell Death in Brain Neurons
Lipton, P. (1999) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.1999.79.4.1431 · Cited by 3,043
Ischemic stroke: experimental models and reality
Sommer, C. J. (2017) · Acta Neuropathologica · doi:10.1007/s00401-017-1667-0 · Cited by 599
Animal models of focal and global cerebral ischemia
Traystman, R. J. (2003) · ILAR Journal · doi:10.1093/ilar.44.2.85 · Cited by 413
Spreading depolarizations cycle around and enlarge focal ischaemic brain lesions
Nakamura, H., Strong, A. J., Dohmen, C., Sakowitz, O. W., Vollmar, S., Sué, M., Kracht, L., Hashemi, P., Bhatia, R., Yoshimine, T., et al. (2010) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awq117 · Cited by 212
Hobohm, C., Günther, A., Grosche, J., Roßner, S., Schneider, D., & Brückner, G. (2005) · Journal of Neuroscience Research · doi:10.1002/jnr.20459 · Cited by 103
Metadata
- Authors
- Brint, S., Jacewicz, M., Kiessling, M., Tanabe, J., & Pulsinelli, W.
- Venue
- Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1988-08
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 474-485
- ISSN
- 0271-678X (ISSN-L)
- 1559-7016
- OpenAlex
- W2073521129
- Cited by
- 489
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 15.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.