Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 314

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Postischemic Blockade of AMPA but Not NMDA Receptors Mitigates Neuronal Damage in the Rat Brain following Transient Severe Cerebral Ischemia

Nellgård, B., Wieloch, T.·1992·Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism

Abstract

Glutamatergic transmission is an important factor in the development of neuronal death following transient cerebral ischemia. In this investigation the effects of N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) and non-NMDA receptor antagonists on neuronal damage were studied in rats exposed to 10 min of transient cerebral ischemia induced by bilateral common carotid occlusion combined with hypotension. The animals were treated with a blocker of the ionotropic quisqualate or α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole (AMPA) receptor, 2.3-dihydroxy-6-nitro-7-sulfamoyl-benzo( F)quinoxaline (NBQX), given postischemia as an intraperitoneal bolus dose of 30 mg kg−1 followed by an intravenous infusion of 75 μg min−1 for 6 h, or with the noncompetitive NMDA receptor blocker dizocilpine(MK-801) given 1 mg kg−1 i.p. at recirculation and 3 h postischemia, or with the competitive NMDA receptor antagonist dl-( E)-2-amino-4-methyl-5-phosphono-3-pentenoic acid (CGP 40116), 5 mg kg−1, given intraperitoneally at recirculation. Treatment with NBQX provided a significant reduction of neuronal damage in the hippocampal CA 1 area by 44–69%, with the largest relative decrease in the temporal part of the hippocampus. In neocortex a significant decrease in the number of necrotic neurons was also noted. No protection could be seen following postischemic treatment with dizocilpine or CGP 40116. Our data demonstrate that AMPA but not NMDA receptor antagonists decrease neuronal damage following transient severe cerebral ischemia in the rat and that the protection by NBQX may be dependent on the severity of the ischemic insult. We propose that the AMPA receptor–mediated neurotoxicity could be due to ischemia-induced changes in the control mechanisms of AMPA receptor–coupled processes or to changes of AMPA receptor characteristics.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/jcbfm.1992.2

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 314

Metadata

Authors
Nellgård, B., & Wieloch, T.
Venue
Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism
Published
1992-01
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
2-11
ISSN
  • 0271-678X (ISSN-L)
  • 1559-7016
OpenAlex
W2071961923
Cited by
314
References
2
FWCI
15.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Postischemic Blockade of AMPA but Not NMDA Receptors Mitigates Neuronal Damage in the Rat Brain following Transient Severe Cerebral Ischemia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/jcbfm.1992.2
The paper
Nellgård, B., & Wieloch, T. (1992). Postischemic Blockade of AMPA but Not NMDA Receptors Mitigates Neuronal Damage in the Rat Brain following Transient Severe Cerebral Ischemia. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism. https://doi.org/10.1038/jcbfm.1992.2

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.