Cited by 30Advanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsOptical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques

Water-diffusion slowdown in the human visual cortex on visual stimulation precedes vascular responses

Kohno, Satoru, Sawamoto, Nobukatsu, Urayama, Shin-ichi, Aso, Toshihiko, Aso, Kenji, Seiyama, Akitoshi, Fukuyama, Hidenao, Le Bihan, Denis·2009·Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism

Abstract

We used magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to investigate the temporal dynamics of changes in water diffusion and blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) responses in the brain cortex of eight subjects undergoing visual stimulation, and compared them with changes of the vascular hemoglobin content (oxygenated, deoxygenated, and total hemoglobin) acquired simultaneously from intrinsic optical recordings (near infrared spectroscopy). The group average rise time for the diffusion MRI signal was statistically significantly shorter than those of the BOLD signal and total hemoglobin content optical signal, which is assumed to be the fastest observable vascular signal. In addition, the group average decay time for the diffusion MRI also was shortest. The overall time courses of the BOLD and optical signals were strongly correlated, but the covariance was weaker with the diffusion MRI response. These results suggest that the observed decrease in water diffusion reflects early events that precede the vascular responses, which could originate from changes in the extravascular tissue.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/jcbfm.2009.45

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In human visual cortex, diffusion changes preceded the BOLD response and were closely time locked to stimulation.

    “In human visual cortex, these diffusion changes preceded the BOLD response and were closely time locked to stimulation (Darquié et al., 2001; Kohno et al., 2009; Le Bihan et al., 2006).”

    From 40 Years of diffusion MRI in the brain: From history to emerging frontiers (2026) · cites this paper as Kohno et al., 2009

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kohno, S., Sawamoto, N., Urayama, S.-I., Aso, T., Aso, K., Seiyama, A., Fukuyama, H., & Le Bihan, D.
Affiliations
  • Kyoto University (JP)
  • Human Brain Research Center, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
Corresponding author
Fukuyama, Hidenao
Venue
Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism
Published
2009-04-22
Volume
29
Issue
6
Pages
1197-1207
ISSN
  • 0271-678X (ISSN-L)
  • 1559-7016
OpenAlex
W2005223471
Cited by
30
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques
Keywords
water diffusion, diffusion MRI, BOLD signal, visual cortex, visual stimulation, hemoglobin, cerebral blood flow, vascular response, near-infrared spectroscopy, cerebral blood volume
MeSH terms
Diffusion, Humans, Photic Stimulation, Time Factors, Visual Cortex, Water

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review