Cited by 72Drug Transport and Resistance MechanismsBarrier Structure and Function StudiesNanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Hypoxia/Reoxygenation Stress Signals an Increase in Organic Anion Transporting polypeptide 1a4 (Oatp1a4) at the Blood–Brain Barrier: Relevance to CNS Drug Delivery

Open access
Thompson, Brandon J, Sanchez-Covarrubias, Lucy, Slosky, Lauren M, Zhang, Yifeng, Laracuente, Mei-li, Ronaldson, Patrick T·2014·Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism

Abstract

Cerebral hypoxia and subsequent reoxygenation stress (H/R) is a component of several diseases. One approach that may enable neural tissue rescue after H/R is central nervous system (CNS) delivery of drugs with brain protective effects such as 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase inhibitors (i.e., statins). Our present in vivo data show that atorvastatin, a commonly prescribed statin, attenuates poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) cleavage in the brain after H/R, suggesting neuroprotective efficacy. However, atorvastatin use as a CNS therapeutic is limited by poor blood–brain barrier (BBB) penetration. Therefore, we examined regulation and functional expression of the known statin transporter organic anion transporting polypeptide 1a4 (Oatp1a4) at the BBB under H/R conditions. In rat brain microvessels, H/R (6% O 2 , 60 minutes followed by 21% O 2 , 10 minutes) increased Oatp1a4 expression. Brain uptake of taurocholate (i.e., Oap1a4 probe substrate) and atorvastatin were reduced by Oatp inhibitors (i.e., estrone-3-sulfate and fexofenadine), suggesting involvement of Oatp1a4 in brain drug delivery. Pharmacological inhibition of transforming growth factor- β (TGF- β)/activin receptor-like kinase 5 (ALK5) signaling with the selective inhibitor SB431542 increased Oatp1a4 functional expression, suggesting a role for TGF- β/ALK5 signaling in Oatp1a4 regulation. Taken together, our novel data show that targeting an endogenous BBB drug uptake transporter (i.e., Oatp1a4) may be a viable approach for optimizing CNS drug delivery for treatment of diseases with an H/R component.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/jcbfm.2014.4

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Organic anions are transported via organic anion transporter-3 (OAT3) and organic anion transporting polypeptide 1a4 (OATP1A4) and 2b1 (OATP2B1).

    “Organic anions are transported via organic anion transporter-3 (OAT3) and organic anion transporting polypeptide 1a4 (OATP1A4) (588) and 2b1 (OATP2B1) (193).”

    From Blood-Brain Barrier: From Physiology to Disease and Back (2019) · cites this paper as [588]

  • OATP1A4 is a known blood-brain barrier transporter of statin.

    “OATP1A4 is a known BBB transporter of statin (588).”

    From Blood-Brain Barrier: From Physiology to Disease and Back (2019) · cites this paper as [588]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 41

  1. 10.1124/pr.112.005991 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/j.neuint.2008.12.015 · DOI
  3. 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2009.06307.x · DOI
  4. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.629931 · DOI
  5. 10.1101/gad.1331805 · DOI
  6. 10.1592/phco.30.5.493 · DOI
  7. 10.6030/1939-067X-3.1.47 · DOI
  8. 10.1017/S1461145711001118 · DOI
  9. 10.3233/JAD-2010-101179 · DOI
  10. 10.4155/tde.11.67 · DOI
  11. 10.1210/en.2008-0188 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1152/japplphysiol.01259.2005 · DOI
  13. 10.1124/dmd.109.029454 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1046/j.1471-4159.2004.02336.x · DOI
  15. 10.1016/0016-5085(95)90588-X · DOI
  16. Gao B, 2000, J Pharmocol Exp Ther, 294, 73, 10.1016/S0022-3565(24)39041-X · DOI
  17. 10.1053/j.gastro.2006.02.034 · DOI
  18. 10.1124/mol.111.071282 · DOI
  19. 10.1124/jpet.110.174151 · DOI
  20. 10.1038/nature02006 · DOI
  21. 10.1038/jcbfm.2009.32 · DOI
  22. 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2004.02871.x · DOI
  23. 10.4103/0253-7613.93860 · DOI
  24. 10.1124/mol.113.086298 · DOI
  25. 10.1016/j.ab.2010.02.036 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1016/S0167-4889(02)00397-X · DOI
  27. 10.1006/bbrc.1999.0815 · DOI
  28. Takasato Y, 1984, Am J Physiol, 247, H484
  29. 10.1186/1478-811X-8-31 · DOI
  30. 10.1371/journal.pone.0057735 · DOI
  31. Beck T, 1987, Am J Physiol, 252, H504
  32. 10.1152/ajpheart.00589.2003 · DOI
  33. 10.1038/jcbfm.2010.29 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1038/jcbfm.2010.119 · DOI
  35. 10.1097/01.mca.0000131573.31966.34 · DOI
  36. 10.1186/1471-2202-10-7 · DOI
  37. 10.1227/01.NEU.0000371729.47895.A0 · DOI
  38. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.05359.x · DOI
  39. 10.1016/S0028-3908(97)00096-8 · DOI
  40. 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2012.07831.x · DOI
  41. 10.1152/ajpgi.00500.2010 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Thompson, B. J., Sanchez-Covarrubias, L., Slosky, L. M., Zhang, Y., Laracuente, M.-L., & Ronaldson, P. T.
Affiliations
  • University of Arizona (US)
  • Department of Pharmacology, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson, Arizona, USA
Corresponding author
Ronaldson, Patrick T
Venue
Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism
Published
2014-01-29
Volume
34
Issue
4
Pages
699-707
ISSN
  • 0271-678X (ISSN-L)
  • 1559-7016
OpenAlex
W2044401686
Cited by
72
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3
FWCI
2.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • American Heart Association
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS084941)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Barrier Structure and Function Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
Keywords
Oatp1a4, organic anion transporting polypeptides, blood-brain barrier, brain drug delivery, atorvastatin, statins, brain uptake, SB431542, PARP cleavage, neuroprotection, cerebral microvasculature, taurocholate, estrone-3-sulfate, fexofenadine
MeSH terms
Atorvastatin, Animals, Biological Transport, Blood Gas Analysis, Blood-Brain Barrier, Carbon Dioxide, Hypoxia, Brain, Electrolytes, Female, Heptanoic Acids, Oxygen, Pyrroles, Blotting, Western, Reperfusion Injury, Drug Delivery Systems, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Neuroprotective Agents, Organic Anion Transporters, Rats, Microvessels

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review