MicroRNA-29b is a Therapeutic Target in Cerebral Ischemia Associated with Aquaporin 4
Open accessAbstract
MicroRNA-29b (miR-29b) is involved in regulating ischemia process, but the molecular mechanism is unclear. In this work, we explored the function of miR-29b in cerebral ischemia. The level of miR-29b in white blood cells was evaluated in patients and mice after ischemic stroke. Brain infarct volume and National Institute of Health stroke scale (NIHSS) scores were analyzed to determine the relationship between miR-29b expression and the severity of stroke. The relationship of miR-29b and aquaporin-4 (AQP4) was further studied in mice. We found that miR-29b was significantly downregulated in stroke patients ( P < 0.05). MiR-29b level negatively associated with NIHSS scores ( r = −0.349, P < 0.01) and brain infarct volume ( r = −0.321, P < 0.05). In ischemic mice, miR-29b in the brain and blood were both downregulated ( r =0.723, P < 0.05). MiR-29b overexpression reduced infarct volume (49.50 ±6.55 versus 35.48 ±2.28 mm 3 , P < 0.05), edema (164±4% versus 108±4%, P < 0.05), and blood-brain barrier (BBB) disruption compared with controls (15 ±9% versus 7 ±3%, P < 0.05). Aquaporin-4 expression greatly decreased after miR-29b overexpression (28±7% versus 11 ±3%, P < 0.05). Dual-luciferase reporter system showed that AQP-4 was the direct target of miR-29b ( P < 0.05). We concluded that miR-29b could potentially predict stroke outcomes as a novel circulating biomarker, and miR-29b overexpression reduced BBB disruption after ischemic stroke via downregulating AQP-4.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Recent findings of a long-range crosstalk between periphery and CNS via miRNA-containing exosomes position the BBB in the center of this communication under physiological and pathophysiological conditions.
“Recent findings of a long-range crosstalk between periphery and CNS via miRNA-containing exosomes position the BBB in the center of this communication (685) under physiological (635, 660) and pathophysiological (378, 493, 498, 587) conditions.”
From Blood-Brain Barrier: From Physiology to Disease and Back (2019) · cites this paper as [635]
The Results report correlated miR-29b levels in blood and brain after ischemic stroke, and the Discussion reports that miR-29b overexpression attenuated BBB damage. But the Discussion proposes examining exosomal miR-29b as a future approach; it does not establish exosome-mediated communication between the periphery and CNS or show that the BBB mediates it. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Astrocyte-endothelial interactions at the blood-brain barrier
Abbott, N. J., Rönnbäck, L., & Hansson, E. (2006) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1824 · Cited by 5,595 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Blood-Brain Barrier: From Physiology to Disease and Back
Sweeney, M. D., Zhao, Z., Montagne, A., Nelson, A. R., & Zlokovic, B. V. (2019) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00050.2017 · Cited by 2,294 · see citing works
Michinaga, S., & Koyama, Y. (2019) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms20030571 · Cited by 263 · see citing works
- Authors
- Wang, Y., Huang, J., Ma, Y., Tang, G., Liu, Y., Chen, X., Zhang, Z., Zeng, L., Wang, Y., Ouyang, Y.-B., & Yang, G.-Y.
- Affiliations
- Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Yang, Guo-Yuan
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2015-07-01
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1977-1984
- ISSN
- 0271-678X (ISSN-L)
- 1559-7016
- PMC
- PMC4671118
- OpenAlex
- W1533514205
- Cited by
- 121
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 3.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › MicroRNA in disease regulation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
- Keywords
- miR-29b, ischemic stroke, cerebral ischemia, aquaporin-4, blood-brain barrier disruption, infarct size, cerebral edema, circulating biomarkers, therapeutic target, microRNA target regulation
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Blood-Brain Barrier, Brain Edema, Cerebral Infarction, Brain Ischemia, Female, Genetic Vectors, Humans, Male, Predictive Value of Tests, Biomarkers, Down-Regulation, Lentivirus, Infarction, Middle Cerebral Artery, Stroke, MicroRNAs, Mice, Aquaporin 4
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review