Cited by 50Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and ManagementAutophagy in Disease and TherapyMelanoma and MAPK Pathways

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Prognostic Impact of p62 Expression in Cutaneous Malignant Melanoma

Open access

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/jid.2013.497

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • High levels of the autophagy adaptor protein and substrate p62 constitute a prognostic marker of malignant melanoma.

    “High levels of autophagy adaptor protein and substrate p62 constitute a prognostic marker of malignant melanoma90, although other work indicates that p62 expression increases, then decreases late in disease progression91.”

    From Mechanisms and prevention of UV‐induced melanoma (2018) · cites this paper as [90]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Ellis, R. A., Horswell, S., Ness, T., Lumsdon, J., Tooze, S. A., Kirkham, N., Armstrong, J. L., & Lovat, P. E.
Affiliations
  • James Cook University Hospital (GB)
  • Institute of Cancer Research (GB)
  • Royal Victoria Infirmary (GB)
  • Newcastle University (GB)
  • University of Sunderland (GB)
Corresponding author
Lovat, Penny E.
Venue
Journal of Investigative Dermatology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-05
Volume
134
Issue
5
Pages
1476-1478
ISSN
0022-202X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1973691911
Cited by
50
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2
FWCI
1.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Investigative Dermatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Sunderland Repository (University of Sunderland) (acceptedVersion)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity) (cc-by-nc)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust
  • Cancer Research UK (15153, A3601)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Autophagy in Disease and Therapy
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Melanoma and MAPK Pathways
Keywords
p62, cutaneous melanoma, autophagy, prognostic factors, disease-free survival, melanoma-specific mortality, selective autophagy, ubiquitinated protein degradation, tumor progression, metastasis, apoptosis, oncogenes, prognostic score, gene set enrichment analysis
MeSH terms
Sequestosome-1 Protein, Melanoma, Cutaneous Malignant, Cutaneous Malignant Melanoma, Autophagy, Humans, Melanoma, Prognosis, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Skin Neoplasms, Biomarkers, Tumor, Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review