Cited by 809Chronic Kidney Disease and DiabetesDialysis and Renal Disease ManagementClinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control

Factors other than glomerular filtration rate affect serum cystatin C levels

Open access
Stevens, Lesley A., Schmid, Christopher H., Greene, Tom, Li, Liang, Beck, Gerald J., Joffe, Marshall M., Froissart, Marc, Kusek, John W. +3 more·2009·Kidney International

Abstract

Cystatin C is an endogenous glomerular filtration marker hence its serum level is affected by the glomerular filtration rate (GFR). To study what other factors might affect it blood level we performed a cross-sectional analysis of 3418 patients which included a pooled dataset of clinical trial participants and a clinical population with chronic kidney disease. The serum cystatin C and creatinine levels were related to clinical and biochemical parameters and errors-in-variables models were used to account for errors in GFR measurements. The GFR was measured as the urinary clearance of 125I-iothalamate and 51Cr-EDTA. Cystatin C was determined at a single laboratory while creatinine was standardized to reference methods and these were 2.1+/-1.1 mg/dL and 1.8+/-0.8 mg/L, respectively. After adjustment for GFR, cystatin C was 4.3% lower for every 20 years of age, 9.2% lower for female gender but only 1.9% lower in blacks. Diabetes was associated with 8.5% higher levels of cystatin C and 3.9% lower levels of creatinine. Higher C-reactive protein and white blood cell count and lower serum albumin were associated with higher levels of cystatin C and lower levels of creatinine. Adjustment for age, gender and race had a greater effect on the association of factors with creatinine than cystatin C. Hence, we found that cystatin C is affected by factors other than GFR which should be considered when the GFR is estimated using serum levels of cystatin C.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ki.2008.638

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. [1]Stevens LA Coresh J Greene T Assessing kidney function - measured and estimated glomerular filtration rate N Engl J Med 2006 354 2473 2483 16760447
  2. [3]Levey AS Coresh J Greene T Using standardized serum creatinine values in the modification of diet in renal disease study equation for estimating glomerular filtration rate Ann Intern Med 2006 145 247 254 16908915
  3. [4]Stevens LA Coresh J Schmid CH Estimating GFR using serum cystatin C alone and in combination with serum creatinine: a pooled analysis of 3,418 individuals with CKD Am J Kidney Dis 2008 51 395 406 18295055 PMC2390827
  4. [5]Madero M Sarnak MJ Stevens LA Serum cystain C as a marker of glomerular filtration rate Curr Opin Neph Hyper 2006 15 610 616 17053476
  5. [6]Kottgen A Selvin E Stevens LA Serum cystatin C in the U.S.: The third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III) Am J Kid Dis 2008 51 385 394 18295054
  6. [7]Ogden CL Carroll MD Curtin LR Prevalence of overweight and obesity in the United States, 1999-2004 JAMA 2006 295 1549 1555 16595758
  7. [8]Knight E Verhave J Spiegelman D Factors influencing serum cystatin C levels other than renal function and the impact on renal function measurement Kidney Int 2004 65 1416 1421 15086483
  8. [9]Macdonald J Marcora S Jibani M A GFR estimation using cystatin C is not independent of body composition Am J Kidney Dis 2006 45 712 719 17059990
  9. [10]Risch L Herklotz R Blumberg A Effects of glucocorticoid immunosuppression on serum cystatin C concentrations in renal transplant patients Clin Chem 2001 47 2055 2059 11673383
  10. [11]Grubb AO Cystatin C-properties and use as diagnostic marker Adv Clin Chem 2000 35 63 99 11040958 PMC7130541
  11. [12]Wasen E Isoaho R Mattila K Serum cystatin C in the aged: relationships with health status Am J Kidney Dis 2003 42 36 43 12830454
  12. [13]Thaczyk M Nowicki M Lukamowicz J Increased cystatin C concentration in urine of nephrotic children Pediatr Nephrol 2004 19 1278 1280 15309601
  13. [14]Taleb S Cancello R Clément K Cathepsin s promotes human preadipocyte differentiation: possible involvement of fibronectin degradation Endocrinology 2006 147 4940 4945 16825321
  14. [15]Manetti L Pardini E Genovesi M Thyroid function differently affects serum cystatin C and creatinine concentrations J Endocrinol Invest 2005 28 346 349 15966508
  15. [16]Shlipak MG Sarnak MJ Katz R Cystatin C and the risk of death and cardiovascular events among elderly persons N Engl J Med 2005 352 2049 2060 15901858
  16. [17]Shlipak MG Katz R Sarnak MJ Cystatin C and prognosis for cardiovascular and kidney outcomes in elderly persons without chronic kidney disease Ann Intern Med 2006 145 237 246 16908914
  17. [18]Sarnak MJ Katz R Stehman-Breen CO Cystatin C concentration as a risk factor for heart failure in older adults Ann Intern Med 2005 142 497 505 15809461
  18. [19]Fried LF Katz R Sarnak MJ Kidney function as a predictor of noncardiovascular mortality J Am Soc Nephrol 2005 16 3728 3735 16251239
  19. [20]Stevens LA Levey AS Chronic kidney disease in the elderly --How to assess risk? [Editorial] N Engl J Med 2005 352 2122 2124 15901867
  20. [21]Rule AD Bergstralh EJ Slezak JM Glomerular filtraton rate estimated by cystatin C among different clinical presentations Kidney Int 2006 69 399 405 16408133
  21. [22]Stevens LA Manzi J Levey AS Impact of creatinine calibration on performance of GFR estimating equations in a pooled individual patient database Am J Kidney Dis 2007 50 21 35 17591522
  22. [23]Wright JT Bakris G Greene T Effect of blood pressure lowering and antihypertensive drug class on progression of hypertensive kidney disease: Results from the AASK Trial JAMA 2002 288 2421 2431 12435255
  23. [24]Lewis JB Agodoa L Cheek D Comparison of cross-sectional renal function measurements in African-Americans with hypertensive nephrosclerosis and of primary formulas to estimate glomerular filtration rate Am J Kidney Dis 2001 38 744 753 11576877
  24. [26]Froissart M Rossert J Jacquot C Predictive performance of the modification of diet in renal disease and Cockcroft-Gault equations for estimating renal function J Am Soc Nephrol 2005 16 763 773 15659562
  25. [27]Israelit AH Long DL White MG Measurement of glomerular filtration rate utilizing a single subcutaneous injection of 125I-iothalamate Kidney Int 1973 4 346 349 4762581
  26. [28]Perrone R Steinman T Beck G Utility of radioisotopic filtration markers in chronic renal insufficiency: simultaneous comparison of 125I-Iothalamate, 169Yb¬DTPA, 99mTc-DTPA, and inulin Am J Kidney Dis 1990 26 224 235 2205098
  27. [29]Erlandsen E Randers E Kristensen J Evaluation of the Dade Behring N latex Cystatin C assay on the Dade Behring nephelometer II system Scand J Clin Lab Invest 1999 59 1 9 10206092
  28. [30]Levey AS Coresh J Greene T Expressing the MDRD study equation for estimating GFR with standardized serum creatinine values Clin Chem 2007 53 766 772 17332152
  29. [31]Levey AS Greene T Beck G Dietary Protein Restriction and the Progression of Chronic Renal Disease: What Have All of the Results of the MDRD Study Shown? J Am Soc Nephrol 1999 10 2426 2439 10541304
  30. [32]Fuller W Vector Explanatory Variables Measurement Error Models 1984 100 184 Wiley New York
  31. [33]Li L Greene T Varying coefficients model with measurement error Biometrics 2008 64 519 526 17970822

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stevens, L. A., Schmid, C. H., Greene, T., Li, L., Beck, G. J., Joffe, M. M., Froissart, M., Kusek, J. W., Zhang, Y. (., Coresh, J., & Levey, A. S.
Affiliations
  • Tufts University (US)
  • University of Utah (US)
  • Cleveland Clinic (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • Université Paris Descartes (FR)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Stevens, Lesley A.
Venue
Kidney International
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-03
Volume
75
Issue
6
Pages
652-660
ISSN
0085-2538 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2010520337
Cited by
809
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 55 · 2025: 62 · 2024: 61 · 2023: 58 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 54 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 40 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 42 · 2013: 41 · 2012: 62
FWCI
36.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Kidney International (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5u01dk053869-08, 5k23dk081017-03)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (K23-DK-081017, U01-DK053869, U01 DK35073, U01DK067651, U01DK035073)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
Keywords
cystatin C, glomerular filtration rate, serum creatinine, chronic kidney disease, age, sex differences, racial differences, diabetes mellitus, C-reactive protein, white blood cell count, serum albumin, errors-in-variables models
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Creatinine, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Glomerular Filtration Rate, Humans, Kidney Function Tests, Male, Predictive Value of Tests, Sex Factors, Racial Groups, Cystatin C

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review