Cited by 30Acute Myeloid Leukemia ResearchProtein Kinase Regulation and GTPase SignalingProtein Tyrosine Phosphatases

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 11 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

Rac guanosine triphosphatases represent a potential target in AML

Open access

Abstract

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is intrinsically prone to resistance to conventional chemotherapeutic agents. Here we explore the Rac family of small GTPases as novel biologic targets for AML treatment. The Rac subfamily of Rho guanosine triphosphatases (GTPases) plays an essential role in regulating normal hematopoiesis (1). Rac proteins cycle between active GTP-bound and inactive GDP-bound states. Of the three known Rac family members, Rac1 and Rac3 are expressed ubiquitously, while Rac2 is restricted to the hematopoietic system. In hematopoietic cells, Rac proteins integrate signals from growth factor, chemokine, and adhesion receptors to mediate a variety of cellular responses, including cell growth and survival, gene transcription, adhesion, motility, and formation of the actin cytoskeleton (1). We recently identified the Rac GTPases as molecular targets in BCR-ABL-induced myeloproliferative disease (2, 3). However, the role of Rac in AML has thus far not been clearly defined. Elevated levels of GTP-bound Rac have been described in CD34+ cells isolated from patients with AML. In these samples, Rac signaling was identified as a critical mediator of stem/progenitor cell and stroma interaction (4). Recently, Wei et al. observed a critical role of Rac signaling in a disease model of human CD34+ cells transduced with the Mixed Lineage Leukemia (MLL)-AF9 fusion oncogene (5). Interestingly, while MLL-AF9 transduced cells were sensitive to Rac inhibition, cells transduced with the AML-ETO oncogene did not depend on Rac signaling for survival and proliferation. These discrepancies prompted us to further investigate the role of Rac signaling in a panel of human AML cell lines, including the MLL gene-rearranged ML-2 cell line and cell lines not harboring MLL rearrangements such as the histiocytic lymphoma U937 and the acute promyelocytic HL-60 cell line. We demonstrate the presence of GTP-Rac in all cell lines via p21-activated kinase (PAK)-binding domain (PBD) pull-down and immunoblot (data not shown). Compared to purified normal human CD34+ cells, ML-2 cells, which contain a MLL-AF6 translocation (6), showed the most profound inhibition of cell proliferation upon pharmacologic inhibition of Rac using the small molecule Rac inhibitor NSC23766 (7) (Figure 1A). To determine whether a correlation exists between Rac activation and the observed decrease in proliferation of ML-2 cells, we analyzed the effect of NSC23766 on GTP-Rac via PBD pull-down assay and observed abrogation of Rac activation with drug treatment (Figure 1B). We next wanted to determine whether NSC23766 treatment would impact apoptosis (Figure 1C) and/or cell cycle progression of ML-2 cells (Figure 1D). ML-2 cells displayed an increase of early and late apoptosis as measured by Annexin V/7AAD 72 hours after drug exposure (Figure 1C). In addition, Rac inhibition led to increased cell cycle arrest in G0/G1 (Figure 1D). Importantly, these effects were specific to ML-2 cells, as normal CD34+ cells were not significantly affected by NSC23766 exposure. Analogous effects were observed in the MLL-AF9 containing THP-1 cell line (Supplemental Figure 1). In contrast to these MLL gene rearranged cell lines, no significant effect of NSC23677 on cell cycle or apoptosis was observed in U937 cells and only marginal effects were observed in HL- 60 cells (data not shown). To further analyze the potential therapeutic efficacy of NSC23766 in a murine xenograft model, 2 × 107 ML-2 cells were transplanted into irradiated (350 Gy) NOD/SCID mice. Alzet osmotic pumps containing NSC23766 (2 pumps, 75 mM NSC23766 per pump) or PBS were implanted on day 21 post transplant. The pumps were exchanged for new pumps on day 35 and removed on day 49 post transplant. Animals were monitored for survival and bone marrow chimerism of ML-2 cells (human CD45+) was assessed by flow cytometry post-mortem. Animals with less than 15% human CD45+ chimerism were censored from the study (3 animals in the NSC23766- and four animals in the PBS-cohort). We noted a significant difference in the survival of PBS vs. NSC23677-treated animals (Figure 2). Death due to disease progression in the treatment group occurred predominantly following pump removal.

Overview

CoChat Summary

Written by AI from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

Rac GTPases are activated in a panel of human AML cell lines, and pharmacologic Rac inhibition with NSC23766 preferentially impairs MLL-rearranged AML cell lines while sparing normal CD34+ cells. In an ML-2 xenograft model, NSC23766 treatment was associated with a significant survival difference versus PBS, though deaths in the treatment group occurred predominantly after pump removal.

Key findings

  • GTP-Rac was present in all tested human AML cell lines by PAK-binding domain (PBD) pull-down and immunoblot (data not shown).
  • ML-2 cells, which contain an MLL-AF6 translocation, showed the most profound inhibition of proliferation after NSC23766; treatment abrogated Rac activation, increased early and late apoptosis by Annexin V/7AAD at 72 hours, and increased G0/G1 arrest. Normal CD34+ cells were not significantly affected.
  • Analogous effects were observed in the MLL-AF9-containing THP-1 cell line. In contrast, U937 cells showed no significant effect on cell cycle or apoptosis, and HL-60 cells showed only marginal effects.
  • In irradiated NOD/SCID mice transplanted with 2 × 10^7 ML-2 cells, NSC23766 delivered by Alzet osmotic pumps (2 pumps, 75 mM per pump) versus PBS produced a significant survival difference; deaths due to disease progression in the treatment group occurred predominantly after pump removal.

Methods

  • In vitro studies used a panel of human AML cell lines, including MLL-rearranged ML-2 and MLL-AF9-positive THP-1, plus U937 and HL-60, compared with purified normal human CD34+ cells.
  • Rac activation was assessed by PBD pull-down and immunoblot; NSC23766 effects were measured by proliferation, Annexin V/7AAD apoptosis, and cell cycle analysis.
  • In vivo, ML-2 cells were transplanted into irradiated NOD/SCID mice; NSC23766 or PBS was delivered via osmotic pumps implanted on day 21, exchanged on day 35, and removed on day 49. Survival and bone marrow ML-2 chimerism (human CD45+) were assessed; animals with less than 15% human CD45+ chimerism were censored (3 NSC23766-treated and 4 PBS-treated animals).

Limitations

  • The paper states that the mechanism by which other cell lines bypass Rac signaling will require further studies, and that more potent Rac GTPase inhibitors are needed for clinical use.
  • Evident from the text: several key assays are reported as “data not shown,” including GTP-Rac presence across cell lines and the lack of significant effects in U937 and HL-60 cells.
  • Evident from the text: the study relies on established cell lines and a xenograft model rather than primary AML patient samples, and the in vivo experiment uses a small number of censored animals and pump-limited drug exposure.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/leu.2008.196

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

9 Own result · 7 No full text of the sources · 3 Own interpretation · 2 Check pending · 1 Own method

  • The quote only partly states this claim. 2
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 3
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 2

Create a free account to see these claims.

Create a free account to see these assumptions.

10 more claims

Create a free account to see all 22 claims and to verify the 3 references still open.

See all claims — free account

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

1 of 1

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Müller, L. U. W., Schore, R. J., Zheng, Y., Thomas, E. K., Kim, M.-O., Cancelas, J. A., Gu, Y., & Williams, D. A.
Affiliations
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Williams, D A
Venue
Leukemia
Published
2008-07-31
Volume
22
Issue
9
Pages
1803-1806
ISSN
  • 0887-6924 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5551
OpenAlex
W2052574445
Cited by
30
References
7
Citations by year
2022: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Leukemia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • St. Baldrick's Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (P01HL069974)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01DK062757)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Tyrosine Phosphatases
Keywords
acute myeloid leukemia, GTPase inhibitors, therapeutic target
MeSH terms
Aminoquinolines, Animals, Cell Cycle, Cell Survival, Drug Screening Assays, Antitumor, Enzyme Inhibitors, Humans, Pyrimidines, Transplantation, Heterologous, Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute, Survival Rate, Drug Delivery Systems, rac GTP-Binding Proteins, Cell Line, Tumor, Cell Proliferation, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-12, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-12 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review