Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 243

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Extended follow-up and impact of high-risk prognostic factors from the phase 3 RESONATE study in patients with previously treated CLL/SLL

Open access
Brown, J R, Hillmen, P, O’Brien, S, Barrientos, J C, Reddy, N M, Coutre, S E, Tam, C S, Mulligan, S P, Jaeger, U, Barr, P M, Furman, R R, Kipps, T J, Cymbalista, F, Thornton, P, Caligaris-Cappio, F, Delgado, J, Montillo, M, DeVos, S, Moreno, C, Pagel, J M, Munir, T, Burger, J A, Chung, D, Lin, J, Gau, L, Chang, B, Cole, G, Hsu, E, James, D F, Byrd, J C·2018·Leukemia

Abstract

In the phase 3 RESONATE study, ibrutinib demonstrated superior progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and overall response rate (ORR) compared with ofatumumab in relapsed/refractory CLL patients with high-risk prognostic factors. We report updated results from RESONATE in these traditionally chemotherapy resistant high-risk genomic subgroups at a median follow-up of 19 months. Mutations were detected by Foundation One Heme Panel. Baseline mutations in the ibrutinib arm included TP53 (51%), SF3B1 (31%), NOTCH1 (28%), ATM (19%) and BIRC3 (14%). Median PFS was not reached, with 74% of patients randomized to ibrutinib alive and progression-free at 24 months. The improved efficacy of ibrutinib vs ofatumumab continues in all prognostic subgroups including del17p and del11q. No significant difference within the ibrutinib arm was observed for PFS across most genomic subtypes, although a subset carrying both TP53 mutation and del17p had reduced PFS compared with patients with neither abnormality. Reduced PFS or OS was not evident in patients with only del17p. PFS was significantly better for ibrutinib-treated patients in second-line vs later lines of therapy. The robust clinical activity of ibrutinib continues to show ongoing efficacy and acceptable safety consistent with prior reports, independent of various known high-risk mutations.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/leu.2017.175

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 243

Metadata

Authors
Brown, J. R., Hillmen, P., O’Brien, S., Barrientos, J. C., Reddy, N. M., Coutre, S. E., Tam, C. S., Mulligan, S. P., Jaeger, U., Barr, P. M., Furman, R. R., Kipps, T. J., Cymbalista, F., Thornton, P., Caligaris-Cappio, F., Delgado, J., Montillo, M., DeVos, S., Moreno, C., Pagel, J. M., Munir, T., Burger, J. A., Chung, D., Lin, J., Gau, L., Chang, B., Cole, G., Hsu, E., James, D. F., & Byrd, J. C.
Venue
Leukemia
Published
2017-06-08
Volume
32
Issue
1
Pages
83-91
ISSN
  • 0887-6924 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5551
OpenAlex
W2623762297
Cited by
243
References
4
FWCI
18.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Extended follow-up and impact of high-risk prognostic factors from the phase 3 RESONATE study in patients with previously treated CLL/SLL. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/leu.2017.175
The paper
Brown, J. R., Hillmen, P., O’Brien, S., Barrientos, J. C., Reddy, N. M., Coutre, S. E., Tam, C. S., Mulligan, S. P., Jaeger, U., Barr, P. M., Furman, R. R., Kipps, T. J., Cymbalista, F., Thornton, P., Caligaris-Cappio, F., Delgado, J., Montillo, M., DeVos, S., Moreno, C., . . . Byrd, J. C. (2018). Extended follow-up and impact of high-risk prognostic factors from the phase 3 RESONATE study in patients with previously treated CLL/SLL. Leukemia. https://doi.org/10.1038/leu.2017.175

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.