Sex differences in corticotropin-releasing factor receptor signaling and trafficking: potential role in female vulnerability to stress-related psychopathology
Open accessAbstract
Although the higher incidence of stress-related psychiatric disorders in females is well documented, its basis is unknown. Here, we show that the receptor for corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF), the neuropeptide that orchestrates the stress response, signals and is trafficked differently in female rats in a manner that could result in a greater response and decreased adaptation to stressors. Most cellular responses to CRF in the brain are mediated by CRF receptor (CRFr) association with the GTP-binding protein, G(s). Receptor immunoprecipitation studies revealed enhanced CRFr-G(s) coupling in cortical tissue of unstressed female rats. Previous stressor exposure abolished this sex difference by increasing CRFr-G(s) coupling selectively in males. These molecular results mirrored the effects of sex and stress on sensitivity of locus ceruleus (LC)-norepinephrine neurons to CRF. Differences in CRFr trafficking were also identified that could compromise stress adaptation in females. Specifically, stress-induced CRFr association with beta-arrestin2, an integral step in receptor internalization, occurred only in male rats. Immunoelectron microscopy confirmed that stress elicited CRFr internalization in LC neurons of male rats exclusively, consistent with reported electrophysiological evidence for stress-induced desensitization to CRF in males. Together, these studies identified two aspects of CRFr function, increased cellular signaling and compromised internalization, which render CRF-receptive neurons of females more sensitive to low levels of CRF and less adaptable to high levels of CRF. CRFr dysfunction in females may underlie their increased vulnerability to develop stress-related pathology, particularly that related to increased activity of the LC-norepinephrine system, such as depression or post-traumatic stress disorder.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Physiological alterations associated with ELAb may contribute to the development of stress-related functional pain syndromes and affective impairment in adulthood, both of which predominately affect women.
“As such, physiological alterations associated with ELAb may contribute to the development of stress-related functional pain syndromes,(17) and affective impairment in adulthood,(20,21) both of which predominately affect women.(22,23)”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 65 · Cited by 401
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [56]Valentino RJ Van Bockstaele EJ Steckler T K N Functional interactions between stress neuromediator and the locus coeruleur-noradrenaline system Handbook of Stress and the Brain 2005 465 486 The Netherlands Elsevier
- Authors
- Bangasser, D. A., Curtis, A., Reyes, B. A. S., Bethea, T. T., Parastatidis, I., Ischiropoulos, H., Van Bockstaele, E. J., & Valentino, R. J.
- Affiliations
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (US)
- Thomas Jefferson University (US)
- Venue
- Molecular Psychiatry
- Published
- 2010-06-15
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 896-904
- ISSN
- 1359-4184 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-5578
- PMC
- PMC2935505
- OpenAlex
- W1998821779
- Cited by
- 401
- References
- 65
- Citations by year
- 2026: 23 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 21
- FWCI
- 8.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Molecular Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- The Medicine Forum (submittedVersion)
- TUScholarShare (Temple University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Mental Health (MH-014654, K99MH092438, MH 40008, T32MH014654, MH084423, R01MH040008, F32MH084423)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Keywords
- corticotropin-releasing factor receptor, sex differences, stress response, stress adaptation, Gs coupling, receptor internalization, β-arrestin2, locus coeruleus, noradrenergic neurons, stress-related psychopathology, depression, post-traumatic stress disorder
- MeSH terms
- beta-Arrestins, CRF Receptor, Type 1, Cyclic AMP, Animals, Corticotropin-Releasing Hormone, Female, Male, Neurons, Sex Characteristics, Stress, Psychological, Signal Transduction, Microscopy, Immunoelectron, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Receptors, Corticotropin-Releasing Hormone, GTP-Binding Protein alpha Subunits, Gs, Arrestins, Protein Transport, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review