An overview of the neurobiology of suicidal behaviors as one meta-system
Abstract
Suicidal behaviors (SB) may be regarded as the outmost consequence of mental illnesses, or as a distinct entity per se. Regardless, the consequences of SB are very large to both society and affected individuals. The path leading to SB is clearly a complex one involving interactions between the subject's biology and environmental influences throughout life. With the aim to generate a representative and diversified overview of the different neurobiological components hypothesized or shown implicated across the entire SB field up to date by any approach, we selected and compiled a list of 212 gene symbols from the literature. An increasing number of novel gene (products) have been introduced as candidates, with half being implicated in SB in only the last 4 years. These candidates represent different neuro systems and functions and might therefore be regarded as competing or redundant explanations. We then adopted a unifying approach by treating them all as parts of the same meta-system, using bioinformatic tools. We present a network of all components connected by physical protein-protein interactions (the SB interactome). We proceeded by exploring the differences between the highly connected core (~30% of the candidate genes) and its peripheral parts, observing more functional homogeneity at the core, with multiple signal transduction pathways and actin-interacting proteins connecting a subset of receptors in nerve cell compartments as well as development/morphology phenotypes and the stress-sensitive synaptic plasticity processes of long term potentiation/depression. We suggest that SB neurobiology might also be viewed as one meta-system and perhaps be explained as intrinsic unbalances acting within the core or as imbalances arising between core and specific peripheral components.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Altered expression of NMDA, AMPA, and kainite glutamate receptors is linked to suicidal behavior and may play a role in the rapid-onset antidepressant and antisuicidal effects of ketamine.
“Altered expression of glutamate receptor N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA), α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA), and kainite glutamate receptors is linked to suicidal behavior (129) and may play a role in the rapid-onset antidepressant and antisuicidal effects of ketamine (130-135).”
From A brain-centric model of suicidal behavior (2020) · cites this paper as [129]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 294 · Cited by 50
- Authors
- Sokolowski, M., Wasserman, J., & Wasserman, D.
- Affiliations
- Karolinska Institutet (SE)
- Corresponding author
- Sokolowski, M
- Venue
- Molecular Psychiatry
- Published
- 2014-09-02
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 56-71
- ISSN
- 1359-4184 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-5578
- OpenAlex
- W1990484049
- Cited by
- 50
- References
- 294
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2
- FWCI
- 0.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Molecular Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
- Keywords
- suicidal behavior, neurobiology of suicide, candidate genes, protein-protein interaction network, protein-protein interaction, core network, signaling pathways, synaptic plasticity, long-term potentiation, long-term depression, stress sensitivity, mental illness
- MeSH terms
- Brain, Humans, Neurobiology, Neuronal Plasticity, Phenotype, Self-Injurious Behavior
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review