Cited by 37Genetic Associations and EpidemiologyTreatment of Major DepressionNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

A rare missense variant in RCL1 segregates with depression in extended families.

Open access
Amin, N, de Vrij, F M S, Baghdadi, M, Brouwer, R W W, van Rooij, J G J, Jovanova, O, Uitterlinden, A G, Hofman, A +10 more·2018·Molecular Psychiatry

Abstract

Depression is the most prevalent psychiatric disorder with a complex and elusive etiology that is moderately heritable. Identification of genes would greatly facilitate the elucidation of the biological mechanisms underlying depression, however, its complex etiology has proved to be a major bottleneck in the identification of its genetic risk factors, especially in genome-wide association-like studies. In this study, we exploit the properties of a genetic isolate and its family-based structure to explore whether relatively rare exonic variants influence the burden of depressive symptoms in families. Using a multistep approach involving linkage and haplotype analyses followed by exome sequencing in the Erasmus Rucphen Family (ERF) study, we identified a rare (minor allele frequency (MAF)=1%) missense c.1114C>T mutation (rs115482041) in the RCL1 gene segregating with depression across multiple generations. Rs115482041 showed significant association with depressive symptoms ( N =2393, β T-allele =2.33, P -value=1 × 10 −4 ) and explained 2.9% of the estimated genetic variance of depressive symptoms (22%) in ERF. Despite being twice as rare (MAF<0.5%), c.1114C>T showed similar effect and significant association with depressive symptoms in samples from the independent population-based Rotterdam study ( N =1604, β T-allele =3.60, P -value=3 × 10 − 2 ). A comparison of RCL1 expression in human and mouse brain revealed a striking co-localization of RCL1 with the layer 1 interlaminar subclass of astrocytes found exclusively in higher-order primates. Our findings identify RCL1 as a novel candidate gene for depression and offer insights into mechanisms through which RCL1 may be relevant for depression.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/mp.2017.49

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In postmortem brains, RCL1 is expressed specifically in the nuclear region of neurons and in the long processes of ILAs (and in no other protoplasmic astrocytes).

    “In postmortem brains, RCL1 is expressed specifically in the nuclear region of neurons and in the long processes of ILAs (and in no other protoplasmic astrocytes), leading to the hypothesis of an active role of ILAs in depression.”

    From Interlaminar and varicose-projection astrocytes: toward a new understanding of the primate brain (2024) · cites this paper as Amin et al., 2018

    The Results section reports nuclear RCL1 labeling in human postmortem cortex, including neurons, and abundant labeling in the long processes of interlaminar astrocytes. It reports an absence of cytoplasmic labeling in GFAP-positive astrocytes in cortical layers 5/6, but does not establish the broader claim that no other protoplasmic astrocytes express RCL1. The Discussion treats a role for interlaminar astrocytes in depression as a possibility requiring further study. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Amin et al. (2018) suggests a direct involvement of ILAs in patients with depressive symptoms.

    “On the other hand, another study by Amin et al. (2018) on depression, suggests a direct involvement of ILAs in patients with depressive symptoms.”

    From Interlaminar and varicose-projection astrocytes: toward a new understanding of the primate brain (2024) · cites this paper as Amin et al. (2018)

    The Discussion reports abundant RCL1 labeling in interlaminar astrocytes in the human cortex and raises their possible role in depression. It does not establish their direct involvement in patients with depressive symptoms: the authors say they cannot distinguish neuronal from astrocyte contributions and call for further study. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The RCL1 expression pattern leads to the hypothesis of an active role of ILAs in depression.

    “In postmortem brains, RCL1 is expressed specifically in the nuclear region of neurons and in the long processes of ILAs (and in no other protoplasmic astrocytes), leading to the hypothesis of an active role of ILAs in depression.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 44

  1. Lohoff FW. Overview of the genetics of major depressive disorder. Curr Psychiatry Rep 2010; 12: 539–546. 20848240 PMC3077049
  2. Paykel ES, Brugha T, Fryers T. Size and burden of depressive disorders in Europe. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 2005; 15: 411–423. 15950441
  3. CONVERGE Consortium. Sparse whole-genome sequencing identifies two loci for major depressive disorder. Nature 2015; 523: 588–591. 26176920 PMC4522619
  4. Demirkan A, Lahti J, Direk N, Viktorin A, Lunetta KL, Terracciano A et al. Somatic, positive and negative domains of the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression (CES-D) scale: a meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies. Psychol Med 2016; 46: 1613–1623. 26997408 PMC5812462
  5. Dunn EC, Brown RC, Dai Y, Rosand J, Nugent NR, Amstadter AB et al. Genetic determinants of depression: recent findings and future directions. Harv Rev Psychiatry 2015; 23: 1–18. 25563565 PMC4309382
  6. Hek K, Demirkan A, Lahti J, Terracciano A, Teumer A, Cornelis MC et al. A genome-wide association study of depressive symptoms. Biol Psychiatry 2013; 73: 667–678. 23290196 PMC3845085
  7. Major Depressive Disorder Working Group of the Psychiatric GWAS Consortium Ripke S, Wray NR, Lewis CM, Hamilton SP, Weissman MM et al. A mega-analysis of genome-wide association studies for major depressive disorder. Mol Psychiatry 2013; 18: 497–511. 22472876 PMC3837431
  8. Sullivan PF. Genetics of disease: associations with depression. Nature 2015; 523: 539–540. 26176922
  9. Offit K. Personalized medicine: new genomics, old lessons. Hum Genet 2011; 130: 3–14. 21706342 PMC3128266
  10. Cross-Disorder Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium, Lee SH, Ripke S, Neale BM, Faraone SV, Purcell SM et al. Genetic relationship between five psychiatric disorders estimated from genome-wide SNPs. Nat Genet 2013; 45: 984–994. 23933821 PMC3800159
  11. Levinson DF, Mostafavi S, Milaneschi Y, Rivera M, Ripke S, Wray NR et al. Genetic studies of major depressive disorder: why are there no genome-wide association study findings and what can we do about it? Biol Psychiatry 2014; 76: 510–512. 25201436 PMC4740915
  12. Amin N, Jovanova O, Adams HH, Dehghan A, Kavousi M, Vernooij MW et al. Exome-sequencing in a large population-based study reveals a rare Asn396Ser variant in the LIPG gene associated with depressive symptoms. Mol Psychiatry 2016; doi:10.1038/mp.2016.101; e-pub ahead of print 19 July 2016. · DOI
  13. Amin N, Belonogova NM, Jovanova O, Brouwer RWW, Rooij JGJv, Hout MCGNvd et al. Non-synonymous variation in NKPD1 increases depressive symptoms in the European populations. Biol Psychiatry 2016; doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2016.08.008; e-pub ahead of print. 27745872 · DOI
  14. Pirooznia M, Wang T, Avramopoulos D, Potash JB, Zandi PP, Goes FS. High-throughput sequencing of the synaptome in major depressive disorder. Mol Psychiatry 2016; 21: 650–655. 26216301 PMC4731311
  15. Subaran RL, Odgerel Z, Swaminathan R, Glatt CE, Weissman MM. Novel variants in ZNF34 and other brain-expressed transcription factors are shared among early-onset MDD relatives. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet 2016; 171: 333–341. PMC5832964 26823146
  16. Auer PL, Lettre G. Rare variant association studies: considerations, challenges and opportunities. Genome Med 2015; 7: 16. 25709717 PMC4337325
  17. Lee S, Abecasis GR, Boehnke M, Lin X. Rare-variant association analysis: study designs and statistical tests. Am J Hum Genet 2014; 95: 5–23. 24995866 PMC4085641
  18. Ott J, Wang J, Leal SM. Genetic linkage analysis in the age of whole-genome sequencing. Nat Rev Genet 2015; 16: 275–284. 25824869 PMC4440411
  19. Pulst SM. Genetic linkage analysis. Arch Neurol 1999; 56: 667–672. 10369304
  20. Cirulli ET, Goldstein DB. Uncovering the roles of rare variants in common disease through whole-genome sequencing. Nat Rev Genet 2010; 11: 415–425. 20479773
  21. Ott J, Kamatani Y, Lathrop M. Family-based designs for genome-wide association studies. Nat Rev Genet 2011; 12: 465–474. 21629274
  22. Hatzikotoulas K, Gilly A, Zeggini E. Using population isolates in genetic association studies. Brief Funct Genomics 2014; 13: 371–377. 25009120 PMC4168662
  23. Pardo LM, MacKay I, Oostra B, van Duijn CM, Aulchenko YS. The effect of genetic drift in a young genetically isolated population. Ann Hum Genet 2005; 69: 288–295. 15845033
  24. Bjelland I, Dahl AA, Haug TT, Neckelmann D. The validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. An updated literature review. J Psychosom Res 2002; 52: 69–77. 11832252
  25. Hung CI, Liu CY, Wang SJ, Yao YC, Yang CH. The cut-off points of the Depression and Somatic Symptoms Scale and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale in detecting non-full remission and a current major depressive episode. Int J Psychiatry Clin Pract 2012; 16: 33–40. 22122659
  26. Hofman A, Darwish Murad S, van Duijn CM, Franco OH, Goedegebure A, Ikram MA et al. The Rotterdam Study: 2014 objectives and design update. Eur J Epidemiol 2013; 28: 889–926. 24258680
  27. Liu F, Kirichenko A, Axenovich TI, van Duijn CM, Aulchenko YS. An approach for cutting large and complex pedigrees for linkage analysis. Eur J Hum Genet 2008; 16: 854–860. 18301450
  28. Abecasis GR, Cherny SS, Cookson WO, Cardon LR. Merlin–rapid analysis of dense genetic maps using sparse gene flow trees. Nat Genet 2002; 30: 97–101. 11731797
  29. Durner M, Vieland VJ, Greenberg DA. Further evidence for the increased power of LOD scores compared with nonparametric methods. Am J Hum Genet 1999; 64: 281–289. 9915967 PMC1377726
  30. Sobel E, Lange K. Descent graphs in pedigree analysis: applications to haplotyping, location scores, and marker-sharing statistics. Am J Hum Genet 1996; 58: 1323–1337. 8651310 PMC1915074
  31. Horn DM, Mason SL, Karbstein K. Rcl1 protein, a novel nuclease for 18 S ribosomal RNA production. J Biol Chem 2011; 286: 34082–34087. 21849504 PMC3190816
  32. Billy E, Wegierski T, Nasr F, Filipowicz W. Rcl1p, the yeast protein similar to the RNA 3′-phosphate cyclase, associates with U3 snoRNP and is required for 18 S rRNA biogenesis. EMBO J 2000; 19: 2115–2126. 10790377 PMC305690
  33. Oberheim NA, Wang X, Goldman S, Nedergaard M. Astrocytic complexity distinguishes the human brain. Trends Neurosci 2006; 29: 547–553. 16938356
  34. Huang J, Howie B, McCarthy S, Memari Y, Walter K, Min JL et al. Improved imputation of low-frequency and rare variants using the UK10K haplotype reference panel. Nat Commun 2015; 6: 8111. 26368830 PMC4579394
  35. Banasr M, Duman RS. Glial loss in the prefrontal cortex is sufficient to induce depressive-like behaviors. Biol Psychiatry 2008; 64: 863–870. 18639237 PMC2709733
  36. Cao X, Li LP, Wang Q, Wu Q, Hu HH, Zhang M et al. Astrocyte-derived ATP modulates depressive-like behaviors. Nat Med 2013; 19: 773–777. 23644515
  37. Nagy C, Suderman M, Yang J, Szyf M, Mechawar N, Ernst C et al. Astrocytic abnormalities and global DNA methylation patterns in depression and suicide. Mol Psychiatry 2015; 20: 320–328. 24662927 PMC5293540
  38. Rajkowska G, Stockmeier CA. Astrocyte pathology in major depressive disorder: insights from human postmortem brain tissue. Curr Drug Targets 2013; 14: 1225–1236. 23469922 PMC3799810
  39. Rajkowska G, Hughes J, Stockmeier CA, Javier Miguel-Hidalgo J, Maciag D. Coverage of blood vessels by astrocytic endfeet is reduced in major depressive disorder. Biol Psychiatry 2013; 73: 613–621. 23146357 PMC3578083
  40. Colombo JA, Sherwood CC, Hof PR. Interlaminar astroglial processes in the cerebral cortex of great apes. Anat Embryol 2004; 208: 215–218. 15221474
  41. Colombo JA, Reisin HD. Interlaminar astroglia of the cerebral cortex: a marker of the primate brain. Brain Res 2004; 1006: 126–131. 15047031
  42. Oberheim NA, Takano T, Han X, He W, Lin JH, Wang F et al. Uniquely hominid features of adult human astrocytes. J Neurosci 2009; 29: 3276–3287. 19279265 PMC2819812
  43. McQuillan R, Leutenegger AL, Abdel-Rahman R, Franklin CS, Pericic M, Barac-Lauc L et al. Runs of homozygosity in European populations. Am J Hum Genet 2008; 83: 359–372. 18760389 PMC2556426
  44. Amin N, Schuur M, Gusareva ES, Isaacs A, Aulchenko YS, Kirichenko AV et al. A genome-wide linkage study of individuals with high scores on NEO personalitytraits. Mol Psychiatry 2012; 17: 1031–1041. 21826060

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Amin, N., de Vrij, F. M. S., Baghdadi, M., Brouwer, R. W. W., van Rooij, J. G. J., Jovanova, O., Uitterlinden, A. G., Hofman, A., Janssen, H. L. A., Darwish Murad, S., Kraaij, R., Stedehouder, J., van den Hout, M. C. G. N., Kros, J. M., van IJcken, W. F. J., Tiemeier, H., Kushner, S. A., & van Duijn, C. M.
Affiliations
  • Erasmus MC (NL)
  • University Health Network (CA)
Corresponding author
Amin, N
Venue
Molecular Psychiatry
Published
2017-03-21
Volume
23
Issue
5
Pages
1120-1126
ISSN
  • 1359-4184 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5578
OpenAlex
W2597448237
Cited by
37
References
5
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1
FWCI
3.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Molecular Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • European Commission (QLG2-CT-2002-01254, 018947, LSHG-CT-2006-01947, 2007–2013, FP7 2007-2013, 201413, FP7/2007, 01254)
  • ZonMw (91111025, Project 91111025, 050-060-810)
  • Russian Foundation for Basic Research (HEALTH-F4-2007-201413, 047.017.043, NWORFBR 047.017.043)
  • Erasmus Medisch Centrum (050-060-810)
  • Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (050.060.810, FP7 2007-2013, NWO-RFBR 047.017.043, 047.017.043)
  • Hersenstichting (F2012(1)-39)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
depression, missense mutations, rare variants, genetic risk factors, genetic isolate, linkage analysis, haplotype analysis, exome sequencing, genetic variance, astrocytes, brain expression, candidate genes
MeSH terms
Exome Sequencing, Adult, Aged, Alleles, Animals, Depression, Depressive Disorder, Exons, Family, Female, Gene Frequency, Haplotypes, Humans, Genetic Linkage, Male, Middle Aged, Mutation, Pedigree, Risk Factors, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Mice, Genome-Wide Association Study, Exome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review