The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Data assimilation constrains new connections and components in a complex, eukaryotic circadian clock model
Open accessAbstract
Circadian clocks generate 24‐h rhythms that are entrained by the day/night cycle. Clock circuits include several light inputs and interlocked feedback loops, with complex dynamics. Multiple biological components can contribute to each part of the circuit in higher organisms. Mechanistic models with morning, evening and central feedback loops have provided a heuristic framework for the clock in plants, but were based on transcriptional control. Here, we model observed, post‐transcriptional and post‐translational regulation and constrain many parameter values based on experimental data. The model's feedback circuit is revised and now includes PSEUDO‐RESPONSE REGULATOR 7 ( PRR7 ) and ZEITLUPE . The revised model matches data in varying environments and mutants, and gains robustness to parameter variation. Our results suggest that the activation of important morning‐expressed genes follows their release from a night inhibitor (NI). Experiments inspired by the new model support the predicted NI function and show that the PRR5 gene contributes to the NI. The multiple PRR genes of Arabidopsis uncouple events in the late night from light‐driven responses in the day, increasing the flexibility of rhythmic regulation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Pittendrigh, C. S., & Daan, S. (1976) · Journal of Comparative Physiology ? A · doi:10.1007/bf01417860 · Cited by 1,636
Universally Sloppy Parameter Sensitivities in Systems Biology Models
Gutenkunst, R. N., Waterfall, J. J., Casey, F. P., Brown, K. S., Myers, C. R., & Sethna, J. P. (2007) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030189 · Cited by 1,261 · cited 2×
“The final model's behaviour may be robust (insensitive) to variation in many parameter values, but this does not justify a post hoc deprecation of laborious parameter measurements”
Cited by
The clock gene circuit in Arabidopsis includes a repressilator with additional feedback loops
Pokhilko, A., Fernández, A. P., Edwards, K. D., Southern, M. M., Halliday, K. J., & Millar, A. J. (2012) · Molecular Systems Biology · doi:10.1038/msb.2012.6 · Cited by 409
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Pokhilko, A., Hodge, S. K., Stratford, K., Knox, K., Edwards, K. D., Thomson, A. W., Mizuno, T., & Millar, A. J.
- Venue
- Molecular Systems Biology
- Published
- 2010-01
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 416-416
- ISSN
- 1744-4292 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2149656802
- Cited by
- 159
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 22.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Data assimilation constrains new connections and components in a complex, eukaryotic circadian clock model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/msb.2010.69
- The paper
- Pokhilko, A., Hodge, S. K., Stratford, K., Knox, K., Edwards, K. D., Thomson, A. W., Mizuno, T., & Millar, A. J. (2010). Data assimilation constrains new connections and components in a complex, eukaryotic circadian clock model. Molecular Systems Biology. https://doi.org/10.1038/msb.2010.69
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.