The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Queueing up for enzymatic processing: correlated signaling through coupled degradation
Open accessAbstract
High-throughput technologies have led to the generation of complex wiring diagrams as a post-sequencing paradigm for depicting the interactions between vast and diverse cellular species. While these diagrams are useful for analyzing biological systems on a large scale, a detailed understanding of the molecular mechanisms that underlie the observed network connections is critical for the further development of systems and synthetic biology. Here, we use queueing theory to investigate how 'waiting lines' can lead to correlations between protein 'customers' that are coupled solely through a downstream set of enzymatic 'servers'. Using the E. coli ClpXP degradation machine as a model processing system, we observe significant cross-talk between two networks that are indirectly coupled through a common set of processors. We further illustrate the implications of enzymatic queueing using a synthetic biology application, in which two independent synthetic networks demonstrate synchronized behavior when common ClpXP machinery is overburdened. Our results demonstrate that such post-translational processes can lead to dynamic connections in cellular networks and may provide a mechanistic understanding of existing but currently inexplicable links.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Comparing protein abundance and mRNA expression levels on a genomic scale
Greenbaum, D. (2003) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2003-4-9-117 · Cited by 1,692
Role of a peptide tagging system in degradation of proteins synthesized from damaged messenger RNA
Keiler, K. C., Waller, P. R. H., & Sauer, R. T. (1996) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.271.5251.990 · Cited by 1,125
Modular cell biology: retroactivity and insulation
Del Vecchio, D., Ninfa, A. J., & Sontag, E. D. (2008) · Molecular Systems Biology · doi:10.1038/msb4100204 · Cited by 519
Cited by
A brief history of synthetic biology
Cameron, D. E., Bashor, C. J., & Collins, J. J. (2014) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro3239 · Cited by 933
Principles of genetic circuit design
Brophy, J. A. N., & Voigt, C. A. (2014) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.2926 · Cited by 931
Genetic programs constructed from layered logic gates in single cells
Moon, T. S., Lou, C., Tamsir, A., Stanton, B. C., & Voigt, C. A. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11516 · Cited by 579
Mechanistic links between cellular trade-offs, gene expression, and growth
Weiße, A. Y., Oyarzún, D. A., Danos, V., & Swain, P. S. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1416533112 · Cited by 403
Metadata
- Authors
- Cookson, N. A., Mather, W. H., Danino, T., Mondragón‐Palomino, O., Williams, R. J., Tsimring, L. S., & Hasty, J.
- Venue
- Molecular Systems Biology
- Published
- 2011-01
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 561-561
- ISSN
- 1744-4292 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2132724170
- Cited by
- 184
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 5.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.