Cited by 338RNA Interference and Gene DeliveryImmunotherapy and Immune ResponsesAdvancements in Transdermal Drug Delivery

A Cationic Nanoemulsion for the Delivery of Next-generation RNA Vaccines

Open access
Brito, Luis A, Chan, Michelle, Shaw, Christine A, Hekele, Armin, Carsillo, Thomas, Schaefer, Mary, Archer, Jacob, Seubert, Anja +13 more·2014·Molecular Therapy

Abstract

Nucleic acid-based vaccines such as viral vectors, plasmid DNA, and mRNA are being developed as a means to address a number of unmet medical needs that current vaccine technologies have been unable to address. Here, we describe a cationic nanoemulsion (CNE) delivery system developed to deliver a self-amplifying mRNA vaccine. This nonviral delivery system is based on Novartis's proprietary adjuvant MF59, which has an established clinical safety profile and is well tolerated in children, adults, and the elderly. We show that nonviral delivery of a 9 kb self-amplifying mRNA elicits potent immune responses in mice, rats, rabbits, and nonhuman primates comparable to a viral delivery technology, and demonstrate that, relatively low doses (75 µg) induce antibody and T-cell responses in primates. We also show the CNE-delivered self-amplifying mRNA enhances the local immune environment through recruitment of immune cells similar to an MF59 adjuvanted subunit vaccine. Lastly, we show that the site of protein expression within the muscle and magnitude of protein expression is similar to a viral vector. Given the demonstration that self-amplifying mRNA delivered using a CNE is well tolerated and immunogenic in a variety of animal models, we are optimistic about the prospects for this technology.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/mt.2014.133

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Self-amplifying mRNA vaccines benefited from formulation with lipid nanoparticles or cationic nanoemulsion and were able to induce protective antibody titers.

    “Studies with self-amplifying mRNA vaccines investigated the effect of different formulations such as lipid-nanoparticles (LNP)10 or cationic nanoemulsion (CNE)11 on the immunogenicity of mRNA vaccines. Self-amplifying vaccines benefited from formulation with LNP or CNE and were able to induce protective antibody titers.”
  • Non-replicating mRNA did not induce any detectable antibody titers even when formulated with cationic nanoemulsion.

    “In contrast, non-replicating mRNA did not induce any detectable antibody titers even when formulated with CNE.”
  • Cationic squalene emulsions can be applicable for mRNA delivery.

    “Finally, cationic squalene emulsions can be applicable for mRNA delivery.336,337”

    From Advances in COVID-19 mRNA vaccine development (2022) · cites this paper as [336]

  • Several preclinical studies have delivered mRNA vaccines encoding HIV proteins using multiple delivery vehicles, but they have had varied success.

    “Several preclinical studies have delivered mRNA vaccines encoding HIV proteins using multiple delivery vehicles, including cationic nanoemulsions109,161, DOTAP/DOPE liposomes162, polymers84,163,164 and ionizable LNPs165,166, but they have had varied success.”
  • Novel antigens are necessary to effectively target HIV in addition to potent delivery vehicles.

    “These studies suggest that novel antigens are necessary to effectively target HIV in addition to potent delivery vehicles.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 46 · Cited by 338

Authors
Brito, L. A., Chan, M., Shaw, C. A., Hekele, A., Carsillo, T., Schaefer, M., Archer, J., Seubert, A., Otten, G. R., Beard, C. W., Dey, A. K., Lilja, A., Valiante, N. M., Mason, P. W., Mandl, C. W., Barnett, S. W., Dormitzer, P. R., Ulmer, J. B., Singh, M., O'Hagan, D. T., & Geall, A. J.
Affiliations
Novartis (Italy) (IT)
Corresponding author
Geall, Andrew J
Venue
Molecular Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-12
Volume
22
Issue
12
Pages
2118-2129
ISSN
1525-0016 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1994674548
Cited by
338
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 51 · 2021: 52 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 7
FWCI
6.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Molecular Therapy (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (HR0011-12-3-001)
  • University of California, Davis
  • National Institute of Biological Resources
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Advancements in Transdermal Drug Delivery
Keywords
cationic nanoemulsions, self-amplifying mRNA vaccine, mRNA vaccine delivery, MF59 adjuvant, nucleic acid-based vaccines, immunogenicity, muscle protein expression
MeSH terms
Animals, Cations, Emulsions, Female, Immunity, Cellular, Macaca mulatta, Mice, Inbred BALB C, Rabbits, RNA, Messenger, RNA, Viral, Drug Delivery Systems, Vaccines, DNA, Mice, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review