Cited by 110Quantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureQuantum Information and CryptographyQuantum Mechanics and Applications

Interpretation of tomography and spectroscopy as dual forms of quantum computation

Miquel, César, Paz, Juan Pablo, Saraceno, Marcos, Knill, Emanuel, Laflamme, Raymond, Negrevergne, Camille·2002·Nature

Abstract

It is important to be able to determine the state of a quantum system and to measure properties of its evolution. State determination can be achieved using tomography, in which the system is subjected to a series of experiments, whereas spectroscopy can be used to probe the energy spectrum associated with the system's evolution. Here we show that, for a quantum system whose state or evolution can be modelled on a quantum computer, tomography and spectroscopy can be interpreted as dual forms of quantum computation. Specifically, we find that the phase estimation algorithm (which underlies a quantum computer's ability to perform efficient simulations and to factorize large numbers) can be adapted for tomography or spectroscopy. This is analogous to the situation encountered in scattering experiments, in which it is possible to obtain information about both the state of the scatterer and its interactions. We provide an experimental demonstration of the tomographic application by performing a measurement of the Wigner function (a phase space distribution) of a quantum system. For this purpose, we use three qubits formed from spin-1/2 nuclei in a quantum computation involving liquid-state nuclear magnetic resonance.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature00801

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Hadamard test can evaluate the overlap <ψ|U|ψ> on a quantum computer using a single extra qubit.

    “The Hadamard test can evaluate such a quantity on the quantum computer using a single extra qubit (Miquel et al. , 2002).”

    From Noisy intermediate-scale quantum algorithms (2022) · cites this paper as Miquel et al., 2002

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Miquel, C., Paz, J. P., Saraceno, M., Knill, E., Laflamme, R., & Negrevergne, C.
Affiliations
  • Universidad de Buenos Aires (AR)
  • Comisión Nacional de Energía Atómica (AR)
  • Los Alamos National Laboratory (US)
  • University of Waterloo (CA)
Corresponding author
Paz, Juan Pablo
Venue
Nature
Published
2002-07
Volume
418
Issue
6893
Pages
59-62
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W1967067160
Cited by
110
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
11.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
Secretaría de Ciencia y Técnica, Universidad de Buenos Aires
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
Keywords
quantum state tomography, quantum spectroscopy, quantum state estimation, Wigner function, phase space distribution, quantum computing, spin-1/2 nuclei, qubits, quantum simulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review