Fingerprints of global warming on wild animals and plants
Abstract
Over the past 100 years, the global average temperature has increased by approximately 0.6 degrees C and is projected to continue to rise at a rapid rate. Although species have responded to climatic changes throughout their evolutionary history, a primary concern for wild species and their ecosystems is this rapid rate of change. We gathered information on species and global warming from 143 studies for our meta-analyses. These analyses reveal a consistent temperature-related shift, or 'fingerprint', in species ranging from molluscs to mammals and from grasses to trees. Indeed, more than 80% of the species that show changes are shifting in the direction expected on the basis of known physiological constraints of species. Consequently, the balance of evidence from these studies strongly suggests that a significant impact of global warming is already discernible in animal and plant populations. The synergism of rapid temperature rise and other stresses, in particular habitat destruction, could easily disrupt the connectedness among species and lead to a reformulation of species communities, reflecting differential changes in species, and to numerous extirpations and possibly extinctions.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Environmental conditions, host availability and preferences, and abundance and feeding behavior of vectors and hosts are the most important drivers influencing the geographic dissemination of helminths and arthropods.
“Environmental conditions, host availability and preferences, abundance and feeding behavior of vectors and hosts are the most important drivers influencing the geographic dissemination of helminths and arthropods [2,49,50].”
From Fleas infesting pets in the era of emerging extra-intestinal nematodes (2013) · cites this paper as [49]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 14 · Cited by 4,774
- Authors
- Root, T. L., Price, J. T., Hall, K. R., Schneider, S. H., Rosenzweig, C., & Pounds, J. A.
- Affiliations
- Stanford University (US)
- American Bird Conservancy (US)
- Michigan State University (US)
- Goddard Institute for Space Studies (US)
- Corresponding author
- Root, Terry L.
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2003-01
- Volume
- 421
- Issue
- 6918
- Pages
- 57-60
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W2075809877
- Cited by
- 4,774
- References
- 14
- Citations by year
- 2026: 69 · 2025: 142 · 2024: 161 · 2023: 178 · 2022: 214 · 2021: 249 · 2020: 248 · 2019: 159 · 2018: 210 · 2017: 206 · 2016: 219 · 2015: 223 · 2014: 228 · 2013: 317 · 2012: 266
- FWCI
- 130.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Nature (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecological Modeling › Species Distribution and Climate Change
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Physiological and biochemical adaptations
- Keywords
- global warming, climate change impacts on species, range shifts, physiological constraints, habitat loss, species extirpation, extinction risk
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Animals, Wild, Biological Evolution, Temperature, Time Factors, Bias, Greenhouse Effect, Ecosystem, Plant Physiological Phenomena
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review