The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Adaptation to natural facial categories
Abstract
Face perception is fundamentally important for judging the characteristics of individuals, such as identification of their gender, age, ethnicity or expression. We asked how the perception of these characteristics is influenced by the set of faces that observers are exposed to. Previous studies have shown that the appearance of a face can be biased strongly after viewing an altered image of the face, and have suggested that these after-effects reflect response changes in the neural mechanisms underlying object or face perception. Here we show that these adaptation effects are pronounced for natural variations in faces and for natural categorical judgements about faces. This suggests that adaptation may routinely influence face perception in normal viewing, and could have an important role in calibrating properties of face perception according to the subset of faces populating an individual's environment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Domain specificity in face perception
Kanwisher, N. (2000) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/77664 · Cited by 968
Cited by
Repetition and the brain: neural models of stimulus-specific effects
Grill-Spector, K., Henson, R., & Martin, A. (2006) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2005.11.006 · Cited by 2,256
Facial attractiveness: evolutionary based research
Little, A. C., Jones, B. C., & DeBruine, L. M. (2011) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2010.0404 · Cited by 1,010
Face Recognition by Humans: Nineteen Results All Computer Vision Researchers Should Know About
Sinha, P., Balas, B., Ostrovsky, Y., & Russell, R. (2006) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2006.884093 · Cited by 674
Adaptation: from single cells to BOLD signals
Krekelberg, B., Boynton, G. M., & van Wezel, R. J. A. (2006) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/j.tins.2006.02.008 · Cited by 494
GREENE, M., & OLIVA, A. (2009) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2008.06.001 · Cited by 467
Metadata
- Authors
- Webster, M. A., Kaping, D., Mizokami, Y., & Duhamel, P.
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2004-04-01
- Volume
- 428
- Issue
- 6982
- Pages
- 557-561
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W2094837771
- Cited by
- 638
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Adaptation to natural facial categories. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nature02420
- The paper
- Webster, M. A., Kaping, D., Mizokami, Y., & Duhamel, P. (2004). Adaptation to natural facial categories. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02420
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.