Cited by 968Face Recognition and PerceptionEvolutionary Psychology and Human BehaviorFace recognition and analysis

Domain specificity in face perception

Kanwisher, Nancy·2000·Nature Neuroscience

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/77664

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Researchers who first discussed the FFA initially claimed to have demonstrated that a particular brain region responds selectively for faces.

    “As for the RTPJ, the researchers who first discussed the FFA initially claimed to have demonstrated that a particular brain region responds selectively for a specific kind of stimulus content, that is, faces.”
  • The current study raises issues that closely parallel those from an earlier debate about the fusiform face area (FFA).

    “In questioning the claim that RTPJ is selective for belief attribution, the current study raises issues that closely parallel those from an earlier debate about another functionally defined region, the ''fusiform face area'' (FFA; Kanwisher et al. 1997;Kanwisher 2000).”
  • Gauthier et al. (2000) were able to identify an FFA in only 5 of 19 participants when using the criteria adopted by the Kanwisher group for functionally defining this region.

    “As reported by Kanwisher [2000], Gauthier et al. [2000] were able to identify an FFA in only 5 of 19 participants when using the criteria adopted by the Kanwisher group forfunctionally defining this region.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kanwisher, N.
Affiliations
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Kanwisher, Nancy
Venue
Nature Neuroscience
Published
2000-08
Volume
3
Issue
8
Pages
759-763
ISSN
  • 1097-6256 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1726
OpenAlex
W1504607447
Cited by
968
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 49 · 2019: 45 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 43 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 42
FWCI
3.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Public Health Service (56037)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face recognition and analysis
Keywords
face perception, domain specificity, domain-general processing, visual perception
MeSH terms
Brain, Brain Mapping, Face, Form Perception, Humans, Neurons, Pattern Recognition, Visual

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review