The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Integration of quanta in cerebellar granule cells during sensory processing
Open accessAbstract
To understand the computations performed by the input layers of cortical structures, it is essential to determine the relationship between sensory-evoked synaptic input and the resulting pattern of output spikes. In the cerebellum, granule cells constitute the input layer, translating mossy fibre signals into parallel fibre input to Purkinje cells. Until now, their small size and dense packing have precluded recordings from individual granule cells in vivo. Here we use whole-cell patch-clamp recordings to show the relationship between mossy fibre synaptic currents evoked by somatosensory stimulation and the resulting granule cell output patterns. Granule cells exhibited a low ongoing firing rate, due in part to dampening of excitability by a tonic inhibitory conductance mediated by GABAA (γ-aminobutyric acid type A) receptors. Sensory stimulation produced bursts of mossy fibre excitatory postsynaptic currents (EPSCs) that summate to trigger bursts of spikes. Notably, these spike bursts were evoked by only a few quantal EPSCs, and yet spontaneous mossy fibre inputs triggered spikes only when inhibition was reduced. Our results reveal that the input layer of the cerebellum balances exquisite sensitivity with a high signal-to-noise ratio. Granule cell bursts are optimally suited to trigger glutamate receptor activation and plasticity at parallel fibre synapses, providing a link between input representation and memory storage in the cerebellum.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Marr, D. (1969) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1969.sp008820 · Cited by 3,253
A theory of cerebellar function
Albus, J. S. (1971) · Mathematical Biosciences · doi:10.1016/0025-5564(71)90051-4 · Cited by 2,539
Cited by
Variations on an inhibitory theme: phasic and tonic activation of GABAA receptors
Farrant, M., & Nusser, Z. (2005) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1625 · Cited by 2,081
Pattern Separation in the Dentate Gyrus and CA3 of the Hippocampus
Leutgeb, J. K., Leutgeb, S., Moser, M.-B., & Moser, E. I. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1135801 · Cited by 1,601
GABA: A Pioneer Transmitter That Excites Immature Neurons and Generates Primitive Oscillations
Ben-Ari, Y., Gaiarsa, J.-L., Tyzio, R., & Khazipov, R. (2007) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00017.2006 · Cited by 1,304
Cerebellar circuitry as a neuronal machine
Ito, M. (2006) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2006.02.006 · Cited by 880
Regulation and function of adult neurogenesis: from genes to cognition.
Aimone, J. B., Li, Y., Lee, S. W., Clemenson, G. D., Deng, W., & Gage, F. H. (2014) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00004.2014 · Cited by 635
Metadata
- Authors
- Chadderton, P., Margrie, T. W., & Häusser, M.
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2004-04
- Volume
- 428
- Issue
- 6985
- Pages
- 856-860
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W2027565428
- Cited by
- 653
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 14.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.