The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Direct evidence for atomic defects in graphene layers
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Electronic properties of disordered two-dimensional carbon
Peres, N. M. R., Guinea, F., & Castro Neto, A. H. (2006) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.73.125411 · Cited by 1,445
Peng, B., Locascio, M., Zapol, P., Li, S., Mielke, S. L., Schatz, G. C., & Espinosa, H. D. (2008) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2008.211 · Cited by 1,122
From Point Defects in Graphene to Two-Dimensional Amorphous Carbon
Kotakoski, J., Krasheninnikov, A. V., Kaiser, U., & Meyer, J. C. (2011) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.106.105505 · Cited by 773
Atomic-resolution transmission electron microscopy of electron beam–sensitive crystalline materials
Zhang, D., Zhu, Y., Liu, L., Ying, X., Hsiung, C.-E., Sougrat, R., Li, K., & Han, Y. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aao0865 · Cited by 561
Zhu, Y., Ciston, J., Zheng, B., Miao, X., Czarnik, C., Pan, Y., Sougrat, R., Lai, Z., Hsiung, C.-E., Yao, K., et al. (2017) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat4852 · Cited by 429
Metadata
- Authors
- Hashimoto, A., Suenaga, K., Gloter, A., Urita, K., & Iijima, S.
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2004-08
- Volume
- 430
- Issue
- 7002
- Pages
- 870-873
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W2079979692
- Cited by
- 1,695
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 28.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Direct evidence for atomic defects in graphene layers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nature02817
- The paper
- Hashimoto, A., Suenaga, K., Gloter, A., Urita, K., & Iijima, S. (2004). Direct evidence for atomic defects in graphene layers. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02817
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
