The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Photosynthetic architecture differs in coastal and oceanic diatoms
Open accessAbstract
Diatoms are a key taxon of eukaryotic phytoplankton and a major contributor to global carbon fixation. They are ubiquitous in the marine ecosystem despite marked gradients in environmental properties, such as dissolved iron concentrations, between coastal and oceanic waters. Previous studies have shown that offshore species of diatoms and other eukaryotic algae have evolved lower iron requirements to subsist in iron-poor oceanic waters, but the biochemical mechanisms responsible for their decreased iron demand are unknown. Here we show, using laboratory-cultured model species, a fundamental difference between a coastal and an oceanic diatom in their photosynthetic architecture. Specifically, the oceanic diatom had up to fivefold lower photosystem I and up to sevenfold lower cytochrome b6f complex concentrations than a coastal diatom. These changes to the photosynthetic apparatus markedly decrease the cellular iron requirements of the oceanic diatom but not its photosynthetic rates. However, oceanic diatoms might have also sacrificed their ability to acclimate to rapid fluctuations in light intensity—a characteristic of dynamic and turbid coastal waters. We suggest that diatoms, and probably other eukaryotic algal taxa, exploited this difference in the underwater light climate between oceanic and coastal waters, enabling them to decrease their iron requirements without compromising photosynthetic capacity. This adaptation probably facilitated the colonization of the open ocean by diatoms, and contributes to their persistence in this iron-impoverished environment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Proterozoic Ocean Chemistry and Evolution: A Bioinorganic Bridge?
Anbar, A. D., & Knoll, A. H. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1069651 · Cited by 1,191
Cited by
Metalloproteins and metal sensing
Waldron, K. J., Rutherford, J. C., Ford, D., & Robinson, N. J. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08300 · Cited by 1,269
The life of diatoms in the world's oceans
Armbrust, E. V. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08057 · Cited by 1,068
Boyd, P. W., Rynearson, T. A., Armstrong, E. A., Fu, F., Hayashi, K., Hu, Z., Hutchins, D. A., Kudela, R. M., Litchman, E., Mulholland, M. R., et al. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0063091 · Cited by 429
Self-citationMicroalgal lipids: A review of lipids potential and quantification for 95 phytoplankton species
Morales, M., Aflalo, C., & Bernard, O. (2021) · Biomass and Bioenergy · doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2021.106108 · Cited by 273
Merchant, S. S., & Helmann, J. D. (2012) · Advances in Microbial Physiology · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-398264-3.00002-4 · Cited by 246
Metadata
- Authors
- Strzepek, R. F., & Harrison, P. J.
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2004-10
- Volume
- 431
- Issue
- 7009
- Pages
- 689-692
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W1983782836
- Cited by
- 463
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Photosynthetic architecture differs in coastal and oceanic diatoms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nature02954
- The paper
- Strzepek, R. F., & Harrison, P. J. (2004). Photosynthetic architecture differs in coastal and oceanic diatoms. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02954
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.