Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 256

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

An unexpectedly rapid decline in the X-ray afterglow emission of long γ-ray bursts

Open access
Tagliaferri, G., Goad, M., Chincarini, G., Moretti, A., Campana, S., Burrows, D. N., Perri, M., Barthelmy, S. D., Gehrels, N., Krimm, H., Sakamoto, T., Kumar, P., Mészáros, P. I., Kobayashi, S., Zhang, B., Angelini, L., Banat, P., Beardmore, A. P., Capalbi, M., Covino, S., Cusumano, G., Giommi, P., Godet, O., Hill, J. E., Kennea, J. A., Mangano, V., Morris, D. C., Nousek, J. A., O'Brien, P. T., Osborne, J. P., Pagani, C., Page, K. L., Romano, P., Stella, L., Wells, A.·2005·Nature

Abstract

‘Long’ γ-ray bursts (GRBs) are commonly accepted to originate in the explosion of particularly massive stars, which give rise to highly relativistic jets. Inhomogeneities in the expanding flow result in internal shock waves that are believed to produce the γ-rays we see. As the jet travels further outward into the surrounding circumstellar medium, ‘external’ shocks create the afterglow emission seen in the X-ray, optical and radio bands. Here we report observations of the early phases of the X-ray emission of five GRBs. Their X-ray light curves are characterised by a surprisingly rapid fall-off for the first few hundred seconds, followed by a less rapid decline lasting several hours. This steep decline, together with detailed spectral properties of two particular bursts, shows that violent shock interactions take place in the early jet outflows.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature03934

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 256

Metadata

Authors
Tagliaferri, G., Goad, M., Chincarini, G., Moretti, A., Campana, S., Burrows, D. N., Perri, M., Barthelmy, S. D., Gehrels, N., Krimm, H., Sakamoto, T., Kumar, P., Mészáros, P. I., Kobayashi, S., Zhang, B., Angelini, L., Banat, P., Beardmore, A. P., Capalbi, M., Covino, S., Cusumano, G., Giommi, P., Godet, O., Hill, J. E., Kennea, J. A., Mangano, V., Morris, D. C., Nousek, J. A., O'Brien, P. T., Osborne, J. P., Pagani, C., Page, K. L., Romano, P., Stella, L., & Wells, A.
Venue
Nature
Published
2005-08
Volume
436
Issue
7053
Pages
985-988
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2037092020
Cited by
256
References
0
FWCI
22.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An unexpectedly rapid decline in the X-ray afterglow emission of long γ-ray bursts. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nature03934
The paper
Tagliaferri, G., Goad, M., Chincarini, G., Moretti, A., Campana, S., Burrows, D. N., Perri, M., Barthelmy, S. D., Gehrels, N., Krimm, H., Sakamoto, T., Kumar, P., Mészáros, P. I., Kobayashi, S., Zhang, B., Angelini, L., Banat, P., Beardmore, A. P., Capalbi, M., . . . Wells, A. (2005). An unexpectedly rapid decline in the X-ray afterglow emission of long γ-ray bursts. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03934

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.