Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,253

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Scalable multiparticle entanglement of trapped ions

Open access
Häffner, H., Hänsel, W., Roos, C. F., Benhelm, J., Chek-al-kar, D., Chwalla, M., Körber, T., Rapol, U. D., Riebe, M., Schmidt, P. O., Becher, C., Gühne, O., Dür, W., Blatt, R.·2005·Nature

Abstract

The generation, manipulation and fundamental understanding of entanglement lies at the very heart of quantum mechanics. Entangled particles are non-interacting but are described by a common wavefunction; consequently, individual particles are not independent of each other and their quantum properties are inextricably interwoven. The intriguing features of entanglement become particularly evident if the particles can be individually controlled and physically separated. However, both the experimental realization and characterization of entanglement become exceedingly difficult for systems with many particles. The main difficulty is to manipulate and detect the quantum state of individual particles as well as to control the interaction between them. So far, entanglement of four ions or five photons has been demonstrated experimentally. The creation of scalable multiparticle entanglement demands a non-exponential scaling of resources with particle number. Among the various kinds of entangled states, the ‘W state’ plays an important role as its entanglement is maximally persistent and robust even under particle loss. Such states are central as a resource in quantum information processing and multiparty quantum communication. Here we report the scalable and deterministic generation of four-, five-, six-, seven- and eight-particle entangled states of the W type with trapped ions. We obtain the maximum possible information on these states by performing full characterization via state tomography, using individual control and detection of the ions. A detailed analysis proves that the entanglement is genuine. The availability of such multiparticle entangled states, together with full information in the form of their density matrices, creates a test-bed for theoretical studies of multiparticle entanglement. Independently, ‘Greenberger–Horne–Zeilinger’ entangled states with up to six ions have been created and analysed in Boulder.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature04279

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 28 references

Cited by

See all 1,253

Metadata

Authors
Häffner, H., Hänsel, W., Roos, C. F., Benhelm, J., Chek-al-kar, D., Chwalla, M., Körber, T., Rapol, U. D., Riebe, M., Schmidt, P. O., Becher, C., Gühne, O., Dür, W., & Blatt, R.
Venue
Nature
Published
2005-12
Volume
438
Issue
7068
Pages
643-646
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2135178212
Cited by
1,253
References
28
FWCI
93.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Scalable multiparticle entanglement of trapped ions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nature04279
The paper
Häffner, H., Hänsel, W., Roos, C. F., Benhelm, J., Chek-al-kar, D., Chwalla, M., Körber, T., Rapol, U. D., Riebe, M., Schmidt, P. O., Becher, C., Gühne, O., Dür, W., & Blatt, R. (2005). Scalable multiparticle entanglement of trapped ions. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04279

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.