Separability of mixed states: necessary and sufficient conditions
Open accessThe claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The Horodecki family extended PPT to a fully general necessary and sufficient condition for separability, namely that a density matrix after any positive map on one subsystem should remain a density operator.
“This was extended by Horodecki Family to a fully general necessary and sufficient condition for separability, which is that a density matrix after any positive transformation (map) on one of the subsystems should remain a density operator 9 .”
From Multiphoton entanglement and interferometry (2012) · cites this paper as Horodecki et al. (1996)
Theorem 2 (p. 7) gives the fully general necessary and sufficient condition: applying any positive map to one subsystem must leave the operator positive. But the paper defines a density operator (state) as also having trace one (p. 3); Theorem 2 does not require the transformed operator to retain that normalization. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe full set of separable mixed states is a bounded convex set in a multidimensional real space of hermitian operators, and any entangled state is separated from the set of separable states by a hyperplane.
“The full set of separable mixed states is a bounded convex set in a multidimensional real space of hermitian operators.Thus, any entangled state is separated from the set of separable states by a hyperplane.”
From Multiphoton entanglement and interferometry (2012) · cites this paper as Horodecki et al., 1996
A hermitian operator W is an entanglement witness if for all separable states Tr(W sep) ≥ 0, whereas there exists an entangled state for which Tr(W ent) < 0; thus via measurement of a suitably chosen witness operator one can detect entanglement.
“A hermitian operator Ŵ is an entanglement witness if for all separable states one has Tr( Ŵ sep ) ≥ 0, whereas there exists an entangled state for which one has Tr( Ŵ ent ) < 0. Thus, via measurement of a suitably chosen witness operator one can detect entanglement.”
From Multiphoton entanglement and interferometry (2012) · cites this paper as Horodecki et al., 1996
Basic structural criteria for deciding whether a density operator represents an entangled state were first given by Peres and in full form by Horodecki et al.
“Basic structural criteria, which decide whether a given density operator represents an entangled state, were first given by Peres (1996) and in the full form by Horodecki et al. (1996).”
From Multiphoton entanglement and interferometry (2012) · cites this paper as Horodecki et al. (1996)
The Procrustean method requires photon pairs all in a pure non-maximally entangled state with known amplitudes and involves only local filtering operations on single pairs.
“The first is the so-called Procrustean method (Bennett et al., 1996a).It requires that the photon pairs are all in a pure non-maximally entangled state, say, |Ψ nonmax = α|H |V + β|V |H , where α and β are two known amplitudes.In this case, the scheme only in-volves local filtering operations (Gisin, 1996;Horodecki et al., 1996) on single pairs.”
From Multiphoton entanglement and interferometry (2012) · cites this paper as Horodecki et al., 1996
The paper describes separability criteria for mixed states (p. 3), not the Procrustean method. Searches for local filtering, single-pair operations, and known amplitudes found no passage describing those features; the reference to Bennett et al. (References, p. 14) does not establish them. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
For 2×2 and 2×3 systems, the positive partial transpose criterion unambiguously distinguishes separable and entangled states.
“However, if ̺ pt is positive, one can infer separability of ̺ only for low-dimensional, namely 2 × 2 and 2 × 3 systems. For these, the positive partial transpose ( ppt ) or standard criterion unambiguously distinguishes separable and entangled states [37].”
From Measures and dynamics of entangled states (2005) · cites this paper as [37]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?
Einstein, A., Podolsky, B., & Rosen, N. (1935) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.47.777 · Cited by 16,654 · see citing works
Teleporting an unknown quantum state via dual classical and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen channels
Bennett, C. H., Brassard, G., Crépeau, C., Jozsa, R., Peres, A., & Wootters, W. K. (1993) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.70.1895 · Cited by 13,703 · see citing works
Separability Criterion for Density Matrices
Peres, A. (1996) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.77.1413 · Cited by 5,191 · see citing works
Quantum states with Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen correlations admitting a hidden-variable model
Werner, R. F. (1989) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.40.4277 · Cited by 4,062 · see citing works
Die gegenw�rtige Situation in der Quantenmechanik
Schr�dinger, E. (1935) · Die Naturwissenschaften · doi:10.1007/bf01491891 · Cited by 3,392 · see citing works
Concentrating partial entanglement by local operations
Bennett, C. H., Bernstein, H. J., Popescu, S., & Schumacher, B. W. (1996) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.53.2046 · Cited by 3,051 · see citing works
Wehrl, A. (1978) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.50.221 · Cited by 1,963 · see citing works
Linear transformations which preserve trace and positive semidefiniteness of operators
Jamiołkowski, A. (1972) · Reports on Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1016/0034-4877(72)90011-0 · Cited by 1,512 · see citing works
Conditional Quantum Dynamics and Logic Gates
Barenco, A., Deutsch, D., EKERT, A. K., & Jozsa, R. (1995) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.74.4083 · Cited by 966 · see citing works
Violating Bell inequality by mixed states: necessary and sufficient condition
Horodecki, R., Horodecki, P., & Horodecki, M. (1995) · Physics Letters A · doi:10.1016/0375-9601(95)00214-n · Cited by 884 · see citing works
Self-citationInformation-theoretic aspects of inseparability of mixed states
Horodecki, R., & Horodecki, M. (1996) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.54.1838 · Cited by 576 · see citing works
Self-citationBell’s inequalities versus teleportation: What is nonlocality?
Popescu, S. (1994) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.72.797 · Cited by 535 · see citing works
Hidden quantum nonlocality revealed by local filters
Gisin, N. (1996) · Physics Letters A · doi:10.1016/s0375-9601(96)80001-6 · Cited by 531 · see citing works
Positive maps of low dimensional matrix algebras
Woronowicz, S. L. (1976) · Reports on Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1016/0034-4877(76)90038-0 · Cited by 454 · see citing works
Bell's Inequalities and Density Matrices: Revealing “Hidden” Nonlocality
Popescu, S. (1995) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.74.2619 · Cited by 432 · see citing works
Positive linear maps of operator algebras
Størmer, E. (1963) · Acta Mathematica · doi:10.1007/bf02391860 · Cited by 354 · see citing works
Quantum α-entropy inequalities: independent condition for local realism?
Horodecki, R., Horodecki, P., & Horodecki, M. (1996) · Physics Letters A · doi:10.1016/0375-9601(95)00930-2 · Cited by 195 · see citing works
Self-citationTwo-spin-12 mixtures and Bell's inequalities
Horodecki, R. (1996) · Physics Letters A · doi:10.1016/0375-9601(95)00904-3 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Self-citationQuantum redundancies and local realism
Horodecki, R., & Horodecki, P. (1994) · Physics Letters A · doi:10.1016/0375-9601(94)91275-0 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- [15][15] K. Kraus, States, Effects and Operations: Fundamental Notions of Quantum Theory , Wiley, New York, 1991. -
- [18][18] E. Strømer, Acta. Math. 110 (1963), 233. -
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Gisin, N., Ribordy, G., Tittel, W., & Zbinden, H. (2002) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.74.145 · Cited by 8,515 · see citing works
Quantum information with continuous variables
Braunstein, S. L., & van Loock, P. (2005) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.77.513 · Cited by 3,858 · see citing works
Entanglement in many-body systems
Amico, L., Fazio, R., Osterloh, A., & Vedral, V. (2008) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.80.517 · Cited by 3,745 · see citing works
Entanglement of a pair of quantum bits
Hill, S., & Wootters, W. K. (1997) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.78.5022 · Cited by 2,823 · see citing works
Gühne, O., & Tóth, G. (2009) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2009.02.004 · Cited by 2,401 · see citing works
Ultracold atomic gases in optical lattices: mimicking condensed matter physics and beyond
Lewenstein, M., Sanpera, A., Ahufinger, V., Damski, B., Sen(De), A., & Sen, U. (2007) · Advances in Physics · doi:10.1080/00018730701223200 · Cited by 2,104 · see citing works
Inseparability Criterion for Continuous Variable Systems
Duan, L.-M., Giedke, G., Cirac, J. I., & Zoller, P. (2000) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.84.2722 · Cited by 2,064 · see citing works
Logarithmic Negativity: A Full Entanglement Monotone That is not Convex
Plenio, M. B. (2005) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.95.090503 · Cited by 1,530 · see citing works
Entanglement measures and purification procedures
Vedral, V., & Plenio, M. B. (1998) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.57.1619 · Cited by 1,419 · see citing works
Multiphoton entanglement and interferometry
Pan, J.-W., Chen, Z.-B., Lu, C.-Y., Weinfurter, H., Zeilinger, A., & Żukowski, M. (2012) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.84.777 · Cited by 1,410 · see citing works
“In this case, the scheme only involves local filtering operations (Gisin, 1996; Horodecki et al., 1996) on single pairs.”
BackgroundMethodExperimental one-way quantum computing
Walther, P., Resch, K. J., Rudolph, T., Schenck, E., Weinfurter, H., Vedral, V., Aspelmeyer, M., & Zeilinger, A. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03347 · Cited by 1,273 · see citing works
“These values are all positive and thus fulfil the necessary and sufficient conditions for separability in two-particle systems 39,40 .”
BackgroundMixed-state entanglement and distillation: Is there a ‘bound’ entanglement in nature?
Horodecki, M., Horodecki, P., & Horodecki, R. (1998) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.80.5239 · Cited by 1,208 · see citing works
Self-citationContinuous Variable Quantum Information: Gaussian States and Beyond
Adesso, G., Ragy, S., & Lee, A. R. (2014) · Open Systems & Information Dynamics · doi:10.1142/s1230161214400010 · Cited by 787 · see citing works
Quantum entanglement in photosynthetic light-harvesting complexes
Sarovar, M., Ishizaki, A., Fleming, G. R., & Whaley, K. B. (2010) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys1652 · Cited by 644 · see citing works
Fisher information and multiparticle entanglement
Hyllus, P., Laskowski, W., Krischek, R., Schwemmer, C., Wieczorek, W., Weinfurter, H., Pezzé, L., & Smerzi, A. (2012) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.85.022321 · Cited by 593 · see citing works
Multipartite entanglement and high-precision metrology
Tóth, G. (2012) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.85.022322 · Cited by 560 · see citing works
Experimental Detection of Multipartite Entanglement using Witness Operators
Bourennane, M., Eibl, M., Kurtsiefer, C., Gaertner, S., Weinfurter, H., Gühne, O., Hyllus, P., Bruß, D., Lewenstein, M., & Sanpera, A. (2004) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.92.087902 · Cited by 522 · see citing works
Measures and dynamics of entangled states
Mintert, F., Carvalho, A. R. R., Kuś, M., & Buchleitner, A. (2005) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2005.04.006 · Cited by 420 · see citing works
Eibl, M., Kiesel, N., Bourennane, M., Kurtsiefer, C., & Weinfurter, H. (2004) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.92.077901 · Cited by 364 · see citing works
High-fidelity spin entanglement using optimal control
Dolde, F., Bergholm, V., Wang, Y., Jakobi, I., Naydenov, B., Pezzagna, S., Meijer, J., Jelezko, F., Neumann, P., Schulte-Herbrüggen, T., et al. (2014) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms4371 · Cited by 325 · see citing works
Classification of multiqubit mixed states: Separability and distillability properties
Dür, W., & Cirac, J. I. (2000) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.61.042314 · Cited by 291 · see citing works
Entanglement detection in the stabilizer formalism
Tóth, G., & Gühne, O. (2005) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.72.022340 · Cited by 281 · see citing works
Byrd, M. S., & Khaneja, N. (2003) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.68.062322 · Cited by 268 · see citing works
Bell States of Atoms with Ultralong Lifetimes and Their Tomographic State Analysis
Roos, C. F., Lancaster, G. P. T., Riebe, M., Häffner, H., Hänsel, W., Gulde, S., Becher, C., Eschner, J., Schmidt-Kaler, F., & Blatt, R. (2004) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.92.220402 · Cited by 241 · see citing works
Overcoming noise in entanglement distribution
Ecker, S., Bouchard, F., Bulla, L., Brandt, F., Kohout, O., Steinlechner, F., Fickler, R., Malik, M., Guryanova, Y., Ursin, R., et al. (2019) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.9.041042 · Cited by 288 · see citing works
Imany, P., Jaramillo-Villegas, J. A., Odele, O. D., Han, K., Leaird, D. E., Lukens, J. M., Lougovski, P., Qi, M., & Weiner, A. M. (2018) · Optics Express · doi:10.1364/oe.26.001825 · Cited by 185 · see citing works
Variational characterizations of separability and entanglement of formation
Audenaert, K., Verstraete, F., & De Moor, B. (2001) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.64.052304 · Cited by 176 · see citing works
Extremal properties of the variance and the quantum Fisher information
Tóth, G., & Petz, D. (2013) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.87.032324 · Cited by 157 · see citing works
Braunstein, S. L., Ghosh, S., & Severini, S. (2006) · Annals of Combinatorics · doi:10.1007/s00026-006-0289-3 · Cited by 145 · see citing works
“Regarding separability of ρAB we have the following criterion [9, 3]: (Peres-Horodecki Criterion (PH)) If ρ is a density matrix acting on C(2) ⊗ C(2) or C(2) ⊗ C(3), then ρ is separable if and only if ρB is positive semidefinite.”
MethodToolbox for entanglement detection and fidelity estimation
Gühne, O., Lu, C.-Y., Gao, W.-B., & Pan, J.-W. (2007) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.76.030305 · Cited by 137 · see citing works
Parker, S., & Plenio, M. B. (2000) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.85.3049 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
Experimental Realization of Deutsch’s Algorithm in a One-Way Quantum Computer
Tame, M. S., Prevedel, R., Paternostro, M., Böhi, P., Kim, M. S., & Zeilinger, A. (2007) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.98.140501 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
Dynamics beyond completely positive maps: Some properties and applications
Carteret, H. A., Terno, D. R., & Życzkowski, K. (2008) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.77.042113 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
Experimental Observation of an Entire Family of Four-Photon Entangled States
Wieczorek, W., Schmid, C., Kiesel, N., Pohlner, R., Gühne, O., & Weinfurter, H. (2008) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.101.010503 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
The Schmidt number as a universal entanglement measure
Sperling, J., & Vogel, W. (2011) · Physica Scripta · doi:10.1088/0031-8949/83/04/045002 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
A comparative study of relative entropy of entanglement, concurrence and negativity
Miranowicz, A., & Grudka, A. (2004) · Journal of Optics B: Quantum and Semiclassical Optics · doi:10.1088/1464-4266/6/12/009 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Fundamentals of universality in one-way quantum computation
Nest, M. V. D., Dür, W., Miyake, A., & Briegel, H. J. (2007) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/9/6/204 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
All entangled states display some hidden nonlocality
Liang, Y.-C., Masanes, L., & Rosset, D. (2012) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.86.052115 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Separable approximation for mixed states of composite quantum systems
Wellens, T., & Kuś, M. (2001) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.64.052302 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Quantitative verification of entanglement and fidelities from incomplete measurement data
Wunderlich, H., & Plenio, M. B. (2009) · Journal of Modern Optics · doi:10.1080/09500340903184303 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
- Authors
- Horodecki, M., Horodecki, P., & Horodecki, R.
- Affiliations
- University of Gdańsk (PL)
- Gdańsk University of Technology (PL)
- Venue
- Physics Letters A
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1996-11
- Volume
- 223
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 1-8
- ISSN
- 0375-9601 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2144126354
- Cited by
- 3,649
- References
- 19
- Citations by year
- 2026: 122 · 2025: 206 · 2024: 180 · 2023: 187 · 2022: 168 · 2021: 169 · 2020: 128 · 2019: 146 · 2018: 149 · 2017: 147 · 2016: 140 · 2015: 133 · 2014: 129 · 2013: 144 · 2012: 127
- FWCI
- 23.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Physics Letters A (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
- Keywords
- quantum entanglement, necessary and sufficient conditions, partial transposition, separability criteria, quantum states
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review