Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 2,575

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Proteome survey reveals modularity of the yeast cell machinery

Gavin, Anne-Claude, Aloy, Patrick, Grandi, Paola, Krause, Roland, Boesche, Markus, Marzioch, Martina, Rau, Christina, Jensen, Lars Juhl, Bastuck, Sonja, Dümpelfeld, Birgit, Edelmann, Angela, Heurtier, Marie-Anne, Hoffman, Verena, Hoefert, Christian, Klein, Karin, Hudak, Manuela, Michon, Anne-Marie, Schelder, Malgorzata, Schirle, Markus, Remor, Marita, Rudi, Tatjana, Hooper, Sean, Bauer, Andreas, Bouwmeester, Tewis, Casari, Georg, Drewes, Gerard, Neubauer, Gitte, Rick, Jens M., Kuster, Bernhard, Bork, Peer, Russell, Robert B., Superti-Furga, Giulio·2006·Nature

Abstract

Protein complexes are key molecular entities that integrate multiple gene products to perform cellular functions. Here we report the first genome-wide screen for complexes in an organism, budding yeast, using affinity purification and mass spectrometry. Through systematic tagging of open reading frames (ORFs), the majority of complexes were purified several times, suggesting screen saturation. The richness of the data set enabled a de novo characterization of the composition and organization of the cellular machinery. The ensemble of cellular proteins partitions into 491 complexes, of which 257 are novel, that differentially combine with additional attachment proteins or protein modules to enable a diversification of potential functions. Support for this modular organization of the proteome comes from integration with available data on expression, localization, function, evolutionary conservation, protein structure and binary interactions. This study provides the largest collection of physically determined eukaryotic cellular machines so far and a platform for biological data integration and modelling.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature04532

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Cited by

See all 2,575

Metadata

Authors
Gavin, A.-C., Aloy, P., Grandi, P., Krause, R., Boesche, M., Marzioch, M., Rau, C., Jensen, L. J., Bastuck, S., Dümpelfeld, B., Edelmann, A., Heurtier, M.-A., Hoffman, V., Hoefert, C., Klein, K., Hudak, M., Michon, A.-M., Schelder, M., Schirle, M., Remor, M., Rudi, T., Hooper, S., Bauer, A., Bouwmeester, T., Casari, G., Drewes, G., Neubauer, G., Rick, J. M., Kuster, B., Bork, P., Russell, R. B., & Superti-Furga, G.
Venue
Nature
Published
2006-01-22
Volume
440
Issue
7084
Pages
631-636
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2050721857
Cited by
2,575
References
6
FWCI
92.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Proteome survey reveals modularity of the yeast cell machinery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nature04532
The paper
Gavin, A.-C., Aloy, P., Grandi, P., Krause, R., Boesche, M., Marzioch, M., Rau, C., Jensen, L. J., Bastuck, S., Dümpelfeld, B., Edelmann, A., Heurtier, M.-A., Hoffman, V., Hoefert, C., Klein, K., Hudak, M., Michon, A.-M., Schelder, M., Schirle, M., . . . Superti-Furga, G. (2006). Proteome survey reveals modularity of the yeast cell machinery. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04532

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.