The cause of the fragile relationship between the Pacific El Nino and the Atlantic Nino.
Abstract
El Niño, the most prominent climate fluctuation at seasonal-to-interannual timescales, has long been known to have a remote impact on climate variability in the tropical Atlantic Ocean, but a robust influence is found only in the northern tropical Atlantic region. Fluctuations in the equatorial Atlantic are dominated by the Atlantic Niño, a phenomenon analogous to El Niño, characterized by irregular episodes of anomalous warming during the boreal summer. The Atlantic Niño strongly affects seasonal climate prediction in African countries bordering the Gulf of Guinea. The relationship between El Niño and the Atlantic Niño is ambiguous and inconsistent. Here we combine observational and modelling analysis to show that the fragile relationship is a result of destructive interference between atmospheric and oceanic processes in response to El Niño. The net effect of El Niño on the Atlantic Niño depends not only on the atmospheric response that propagates the El Niño signal to the tropical Atlantic, but also on a dynamic ocean-atmosphere interaction in the equatorial Atlantic that works against the atmospheric response. These results emphasize the importance of having an improved ocean-observing system in the tropical Atlantic, because our ability to predict the Atlantic Niño will depend not only on our knowledge of conditions in the tropical Pacific, but also on an accurate estimate of the state of the upper ocean in the equatorial Atlantic.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There is significant external forcing of TAV from ENSO, the North Atlantic Oscillation, and the South Atlantic Anticyclone.
“There is also significant external forcing of TAV from ENSO, the North Atlantic Oscillation, and the South Atlantic Anticyclone (Enfield and Mayer, 1997;Czaja et al., 2002;Chang et al., 2006;Illig and Dewitte, 2006;Lübbecke et al., 2010;Lübbecke and McPhaden, 2012).”
From The tropical atlantic observing system (2019) · cites this paper as Chang et al., 2006
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 22 · Cited by 258
- Authors
- Chang, P., Fang, Y., Saravanan, R., Ji, L., & Seidel, H.
- Affiliations
- Texas A&M University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Chang, Ping
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2006-09
- Volume
- 443
- Issue
- 7109
- Pages
- 324-328
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W2080553664
- Cited by
- 258
- References
- 22
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 5.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Nature (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
- Keywords
- Atlantic Niño, equatorial Atlantic, ocean-atmosphere interaction, seasonal climate prediction, coupled climate model, destructive interference
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review