Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 453

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Symbiosis insights through metagenomic analysis of a microbial consortium

Open access
Woyke, Tanja, Teeling, Hanno, Ivanova, Natalia N., Huntemann, Marcel, Richter, Michael, Gloeckner, Frank Oliver, Boffelli, Dario, Anderson, Iain J., Barry, Kerrie W., Shapiro, Harris J., Szeto, Ernest, Kyrpides, Nikos C., Mussmann, Marc, Amann, Rudolf, Bergin, Claudia, Ruehland, Caroline, Rubin, Edward M., Dubilier, Nicole·2006·Nature

Abstract

Symbioses between bacteria and eukaryotes are ubiquitous, yet our understanding of the interactions driving these associations is hampered by our inability to cultivate most host-associated microbes. Here we use a metagenomic approach to describe four co-occurring symbionts from the marine oligochaete Olavius algarvensis, a worm lacking a mouth, gut and nephridia. Shotgun sequencing and metabolic pathway reconstruction revealed that the symbionts are sulphur-oxidizing and sulphate-reducing bacteria, all of which are capable of carbon fixation, thus providing the host with multiple sources of nutrition. Molecular evidence for the uptake and recycling of worm waste products by the symbionts suggests how the worm could eliminate its excretory system, an adaptation unique among annelid worms. We propose a model that describes how the versatile metabolism within this symbiotic consortium provides the host with an optimal energy supply as it shuttles between the upper oxic and lower anoxic coastal sediments that it inhabits.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature05192

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 453

Metadata

Authors
Woyke, T., Teeling, H., Ivanova, N. N., Huntemann, M., Richter, M., Gloeckner, F. O., Boffelli, D., Anderson, I. J., Barry, K. W., Shapiro, H. J., Szeto, E., Kyrpides, N. C., Mussmann, M., Amann, R., Bergin, C., Ruehland, C., Rubin, E. M., & Dubilier, N.
Venue
Nature
Published
2006-09-17
Volume
443
Issue
7114
Pages
950-955
ISSN
  • 0028-0836
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2023829651
Cited by
453
References
5
FWCI
30.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Symbiosis insights through metagenomic analysis of a microbial consortium. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nature05192
The paper
Woyke, T., Teeling, H., Ivanova, N. N., Huntemann, M., Richter, M., Gloeckner, F. O., Boffelli, D., Anderson, I. J., Barry, K. W., Shapiro, H. J., Szeto, E., Kyrpides, N. C., Mussmann, M., Amann, R., Bergin, C., Ruehland, C., Rubin, E. M., & Dubilier, N. (2006). Symbiosis insights through metagenomic analysis of a microbial consortium. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05192

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.