The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Global trends of whole-genome duplications revealed by the ciliate Paramecium tetraurelia
Open accessAbstract
The duplication of entire genomes has long been recognized as having great potential for evolutionary novelties, but the mechanisms underlying their resolution through gene loss are poorly understood. Here we show that in the unicellular eukaryote Paramecium tetraurelia, a ciliate, most of the nearly 40,000 genes arose through at least three successive whole-genome duplications. Phylogenetic analysis indicates that the most recent duplication coincides with an explosion of speciation events that gave rise to the P. aurelia complex of 15 sibling species. We observed that gene loss occurs over a long timescale, not as an initial massive event. Genes from the same metabolic pathway or protein complex have common patterns of gene loss, and highly expressed genes are over-retained after all duplications. The conclusion of this analysis is that many genes are maintained after whole-genome duplication not because of functional innovation but because of gene dosage constraints. Whole-genome duplications are a powerful evolutionary force, and much interest is focused on what happens to genes duplicated in these events. The genome of the ciliate Paramecium tetraurelia has now been sequenced, and its nearly 40,000 genes (it's a very 'gene rich' genome) show evidence of at least three whole-genome duplications. As the gene order is particularly well conserved in Paramecium, it is possible to identify genes that duplicated at each event, providing a complete picture of gene loss at different time points after duplications. A study of the duplicated genes in Paramecium tetraurelia suggests that after whole-genome duplication events, many duplicated genes are not able to immediately functionally diverge, because dosage constraints act on them. These dosage constraints also prevent loss of many duplicated genes after whole genome duplications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Jaillon, O., Aury, J.-M., Brunet, F., Petit, J.-L., Stange-Thomann, N., Mauceli, E., Bouneau, L., Fischer, C., Ozouf-Costaz, C., Bernot, A., et al. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03025 · Cited by 1,966
Self-citationDujon, B., Sherman, D., Fischer, G., Durrens, P., Casaregola, S., Lafontaine, I., de Montigny, J., Marck, C., Neuvéglise, C., Talla, E., et al. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02579 · Cited by 1,623
Self-citationThe genome of the social amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum
Eichinger, L., Pachebat, J. A., Glöckner, G., Rajandream, M.-A., Sucgang, R., Berriman, M., Song, J., Olsen, R., Szafranski, K., Xu, Q., et al. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03481 · Cited by 1,351
A Recent Polyploidy Superimposed on Older Large-Scale Duplications in the Arabidopsis Genome
Blanc, G., Hokamp, K., & Wolfe, K. H. (2003) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.751803 · Cited by 724
Keeling, P. J., Burger, G., Durnford, D. G., Lang, B. F., Lee, R. W., Pearlman, R. E., Roger, A. J., & Gray, M. W. (2005) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2005.09.005 · Cited by 579
Cited by
Horizontal gene transfer in eukaryotic evolution
Keeling, P. J., & Palmer, J. D. (2008) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2386 · Cited by 1,355
The energetics of genome complexity.
Lane, N., & Martin, W. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09486 · Cited by 1,289
Turning a hobby into a job: How duplicated genes find new functions
Conant, G. C., & Wolfe, K. H. (2008) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2482 · Cited by 1,281
The evolutionary significance of ancient genome duplications
Van de Peer, Y., Maere, S., & Meyer, A. (2009) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2600 · Cited by 1,129
Keeling, P. J., Burki, F., Wilcox, H. M., Allam, B., Allen, E. E., Amaral-Zettler, L. A., Armbrust, E. V., Archibald, J. M., Bharti, A. K., Bell, C. J., et al. (2014) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001889 · Cited by 1,042
Metadata
- Authors
- Aury, J.-M., Jaillon, O., Duret, L., Noel, B., Jubin, C., Porcel, B. M., Ségurens, B., Daubin, V., Anthouard, V., Aiach, N., Arnaiz, O., Billaut, A., Beisson, J., Blanc, I., Bouhouche, K., Câmara, F., Duharcourt, S., Guigo, R., Gogendeau, D., Katinka, M., Keller, A.-M., Kissmehl, R., Klotz, C., Koll, F., Le Mouël, A., Lepère, G., Malinsky, S., Nowacki, M., Nowak, J. K., Plattner, H., Poulain, J., Ruiz, F., Serrano, V., Zagulski, M., Dessen, P., Bétermier, M., Weissenbach, J., Scarpelli, C., Schächter, V., Sperling, L., Meyer, E., Cohen, J., & Wincker, P.
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2006-11
- Volume
- 444
- Issue
- 7116
- Pages
- 171-178
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W1983811433
- Cited by
- 846
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 66.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Global trends of whole-genome duplications revealed by the ciliate Paramecium tetraurelia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nature05230
- The paper
- Aury, J.-M., Jaillon, O., Duret, L., Noel, B., Jubin, C., Porcel, B. M., Ségurens, B., Daubin, V., Anthouard, V., Aiach, N., Arnaiz, O., Billaut, A., Beisson, J., Blanc, I., Bouhouche, K., Câmara, F., Duharcourt, S., Guigo, R., Gogendeau, D., . . . Wincker, P. (2006). Global trends of whole-genome duplications revealed by the ciliate Paramecium tetraurelia. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05230
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.