The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Strong atom–field coupling for Bose–Einstein condensates in an optical cavity on a chip
Open accessAbstract
An optical cavity enhances the interaction between atoms and light, and the rate of coherent atom–photon coupling can be made larger than all decoherence rates of the system. For single atoms, this ‘strong coupling regime’ of cavity quantum electrodynamics has been the subject of many experimental advances. Efforts have been made to control the coupling rate by trapping the atom and cooling it towards the motional ground state; the latter has been achieved in one dimension so far. For systems of many atoms, the three-dimensional ground state of motion is routinely achieved in atomic Bose–Einstein condensates (BECs). Although experiments combining BECs and optical cavities have been reported recently, coupling BECs to cavities that are in the strong-coupling regime for single atoms has remained an elusive goal. Here we report such an experiment, made possible by combining a fibre-based cavity with atom-chip technology. This enables single-atom cavity quantum electrodynamics experiments with a simplified set-up and realizes the situation of many atoms in a cavity, each of which is identically and strongly coupled to the cavity mode. Moreover, the BEC can be positioned deterministically anywhere within the cavity and localized entirely within a single antinode of the standing-wave cavity field; we demonstrate that this gives rise to a controlled, tunable coupling rate. We study the heating rate caused by a cavity transmission measurement as a function of the coupling rate and find no measurable heating for strongly coupled BECs. The spectrum of the coupled atoms–cavity system, which we map out over a wide range of atom numbers and cavity–atom detunings, shows vacuum Rabi splittings exceeding 20 gigahertz, as well as an unpredicted additional splitting, which we attribute to the atomic hyperfine structure. We anticipate that the system will be suitable as a light–matter quantum interface for quantum information.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Coherence in Spontaneous Radiation Processes
Dicke, R. H. (1954) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.93.99 · Cited by 7,445
Long-distance quantum communication with atomic ensembles and linear optics
Duan, L.-M., Lukin, M. D., Cirac, J. I., & Zoller, P. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35106500 · Cited by 3,609
Haroche, S., & Raimond, J.-M. (2006) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198509141.001.0001 · Cited by 1,702
Exact Solution for an N -Molecule—Radiation-Field Hamiltonian
Tavis, M., & Cummings, F. W. (1968) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.170.379 · Cited by 1,568
Collapse and revival of the matter wave field of a Bose–Einstein condensate
Greiner, M., Mandel, O., Hänsch, T. W., & Bloch, I. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature00968 · Cited by 1,219
Observation of normal-mode splitting for an atom in an optical cavity
Thompson, R. J., Rempe, G., & Kimble, H. J. (1992) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.68.1132 · Cited by 1,029
Observation of strong coupling between one atom and a monolithic microresonator
Aoki, T., Dayan, B., Wilcut, E., Bowen, W. P., Parkins, A. S., Kippenberg, T. J., Vahala, K. J., & Kimble, H. J. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05147 · Cited by 781
Bose–Einstein condensation on a microelectronic chip
Hänsel, W., Hommelhoff, P., Hänsch, T. W., & Reichel, J. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35097032 · Cited by 662
Self-citationMagnetic microtraps for ultracold atoms
Fortágh, J., & Zimmermann, C. (2007) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.79.235 · Cited by 579
Strong Interactions of Single Atoms and Photons in Cavity QED
Kimble, H. J. (1998) · Physica Scripta · doi:10.1238/physica.topical.076a00127 · Cited by 559
Cited by
Atom-chip-based generation of entanglement for quantum metrology
Riedel, M. F., Böhi, P., Li, Y., Hänsch, T. W., Sinatra, A., & Treutlein, P. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08988 · Cited by 874
A quantum gate between a flying optical photon and a single trapped atom
Reiserer, A., Kalb, N., Rempe, G., & Ritter, S. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13177 · Cited by 401
Ultrahigh-Finesse, Low-Mode-Volume Fabry–Perot Microcavity
Muller, A., Flagg, E. B., Lawall, J. R., & Solomon, G. S. (2010) · Optics Letters · doi:10.1364/ol.35.002293 · Cited by 116
Heralded Entanglement of Two Ions in an Optical Cavity
Casabone, B., Stute, A., Friebe, K., Brandstätter, B., Schüppert, K., Blatt, R., & Northup, T. E. (2013) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.111.100505 · Cited by 86
Deterministic spin-photon entanglement from a trapped ion in a fiber Fabry–Perot cavity
Kobel, P., Breyer, M., & Köhl, M. (2021) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-020-00338-2 · Cited by 39
Metadata
- Authors
- Colombe, Y., Steinmetz, T., Dubois, G., Linke, F., Hunger, D., & Reichel, J.
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2007-11
- Volume
- 450
- Issue
- 7167
- Pages
- 272-276
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W2004264607
- Cited by
- 699
- References
- 35
- FWCI
- 33.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Strong atom–field coupling for Bose–Einstein condensates in an optical cavity on a chip. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nature06331
- The paper
- Colombe, Y., Steinmetz, T., Dubois, G., Linke, F., Hunger, D., & Reichel, J. (2007). Strong atom–field coupling for Bose–Einstein condensates in an optical cavity on a chip. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06331
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.