Cited by 116Strong Light-Matter InteractionsPhotonic and Optical DevicesMechanical and Optical Resonators

Ultrahigh-Finesse, Low-Mode-Volume Fabry–Perot Microcavity

Muller, Andreas, Flagg, Edward B., Lawall, John R., Solomon, Glenn S.·2010·Optics Letters

Abstract

Ultralow-loss concave micromirrors with radius of curvature below 60 microm were fabricated by laser ablation and reflective coatings. A 10-microm-long microcavity with a mode volume of 40 microm(3) was set up with two such mirrors, and the cavity linewidth was measured both spectrally and temporally. The smallest linewidth obtained was 96 MHz, corresponding to a quality factor of 3.3x10(6) and a finesse in excess of 1.5x10(5). With these parameters, we estimate that a variety of solid-state quantum emitters coupled to the cavity may enter the strong coupling regime.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1364/ol.35.002293

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In conventional dielectric cavities, the effective volume cannot fall below the order of ∼(λc/2n)^3; in planar microcavities, the effective volume can be approximated by the effective cavity length.

    “Since the effective volume (Veff ) depends on the electric field distribution (E ( → r ) ) and the relative permittivity of the medium ( ε ( → r ) ), in conventional dielectric cavities, it cannot fall below the order ∼ ( λ c /2 n ) 3 . However, the effective volume can be approximated by the effective cavity length (Leff ) in the case of a planar configuration of the microcavities [280-282]:”

    From Metal Oxide Thin Films for Advanced Photonic Applications (2026) · cites this paper as [281]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 27 · Cited by 116

Authors
Muller, A., Flagg, E. B., Lawall, J. R., & Solomon, G. S.
Affiliations
National Institute of Standards and Technology (US)
Venue
Optics Letters
Published
2010-06-30
Volume
35
Issue
13
Pages
2293
ISSN
  • 0146-9592 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-4794
OpenAlex
W2121112939
Cited by
116
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Optics Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation (NSF)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Strong Light-Matter Interactions
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Photonic and Optical Devices
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Mechanical and Optical Resonators
Keywords
Fabry-Perot microcavity, laser ablation, reflective coatings, cavity linewidth, quality factor, strong coupling, solid-state quantum emitters, microcavity quantum electrodynamics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review