Cited by 466Astro and Planetary ScienceGeological and Geochemical AnalysisPlanetary Science and Exploration

Late formation and prolonged differentiation of the Moon inferred from W isotopes in lunar metals

Touboul, M., Kleine, T., Bourdon, B., Palme, H., Wieler, R.·2007·Nature

Abstract

The Moon is thought to have formed from debris ejected by a giant impact with the early 'proto'-Earth and, as a result of the high energies involved, the Moon would have melted to form a magma ocean. The timescales for formation and solidification of the Moon can be quantified by using 182Hf-182W and 146Sm-142Nd chronometry, but these methods have yielded contradicting results. In earlier studies, 182W anomalies in lunar rocks were attributed to decay of 182Hf within the lunar mantle and were used to infer that the Moon solidified within the first approximately 60 million years of the Solar System. However, the dominant 182W component in most lunar rocks reflects cosmogenic production mainly by neutron capture of 181Ta during cosmic-ray exposure of the lunar surface, compromising a reliable interpretation in terms of 182Hf-182W chronometry. Here we present tungsten isotope data for lunar metals that do not contain any measurable Ta-derived 182W. All metals have identical 182W/184W ratios, indicating that the lunar magma ocean did not crystallize within the first approximately 60 Myr of the Solar System, which is no longer inconsistent with Sm-Nd chronometry. Our new data reveal that the lunar and terrestrial mantles have identical 182W/184W. This, in conjunction with 147Sm-143Nd ages for the oldest lunar rocks, constrains the age of the Moon and Earth to Myr after formation of the Solar System. The identical 182W/184W ratios of the lunar and terrestrial mantles require either that the Moon is derived mainly from terrestrial material or that tungsten isotopes in the Moon and Earth's mantle equilibrated in the aftermath of the giant impact, as has been proposed to account for identical oxygen isotope compositions of the Earth and Moon.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature06428

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The formation of Earth commenced no earlier than 10 million years after the formation of the Solar System.

    “Thus, the formation of Earth commenced no earlier than 10 million years after the formation of the Solar System (Kleine et al., 2004; Jacobsen, 2005; Touboul et al., 2007).”

    From The Astrobiology Primer v2.0 (2016) · cites this paper as Touboul et al., 2007

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Touboul, M., Kleine, T., Bourdon, B., Palme, H., & Wieler, R.
Affiliations
  • ETH Zurich (CH)
  • University of Cologne (DE)
Corresponding author
Touboul, M.
Venue
Nature
Published
2007-12
Volume
450
Issue
7173
Pages
1206-1209
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2091990164
Cited by
466
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 41 · 2014: 45 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 23
FWCI
16.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astro and Planetary Science
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › Geological and Geochemical Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Planetary Science and Exploration
Keywords
Moon formation, tungsten isotopes, lunar magma ocean, giant impact hypothesis, lunar mantle

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review