A fundamental avian wing-stroke provides a new perspective on the evolution of flight
Abstract
The evolution of avian flight remains one of biology's major controversies, with a long history of functional interpretations of fossil forms given as evidence for either an arboreal or cursorial origin of flight. Despite repeated emphasis on the 'wing-stroke' as a necessary avenue of investigation for addressing the evolution of flight, no empirical data exist on wing-stroke dynamics in an experimental evolutionary context. Here we present the first comparison of wing-stroke kinematics of the primary locomotor modes (descending flight and incline flap-running) that lead to level-flapping flight in juvenile ground birds throughout development. We offer results that are contrary both to popular perception and inferences from other studies. Starting shortly after hatching and continuing through adulthood, ground birds use a wing-stroke confined to a narrow range of less than 20 degrees , when referenced to gravity, that directs aerodynamic forces about 40 degrees above horizontal, permitting a 180 degrees range in the direction of travel. Based on our results, we put forth an ontogenetic-transitional wing hypothesis that posits that the incremental adaptive stages leading to the evolution of avian flight correspond behaviourally and morphologically to transitional stages observed in ontogenetic forms.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
WAIR is used by extant birds to ascend steeply inclined, vertical, and even slight overhanging surfaces with the aid of a powerful flight stroke.
“WAIR is used by extant birds to ascend steeply inclined, vertical, and even slight overhanging surfaces with the aid of a powerful flight stroke.”
From Assessing Arboreal Adaptations of Bird Antecedents: Testing the Ecological Setting of the Origin of the Avian Flight Stroke (2011) · cites this paper as [23]
WAIR behaviour has been documented in at least twenty species of extant birds, including both paleognath and neognaths, including their non-volant chicks.
“WAIR behaviour has been documented in at least twenty species of extant birds, including both paleognath and neognaths [23], including their non-volant chicks.”
From Assessing Arboreal Adaptations of Bird Antecedents: Testing the Ecological Setting of the Origin of the Avian Flight Stroke (2011) · cites this paper as [23]
Cites
Wing-assisted incline running and the evolution of flight.
Dial, K. P. (2003) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1078237 · Cited by 236 · see citing works
Self-citationFeathers of <i>Archaeopteryx</i> : Asymmetric Vanes Indicate Aerodynamic Function
Feduccia, A., & Tordoff, H. B. (1979) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.203.4384.1021 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Glorified Dinosaurs: The Origin and Early Evolution of Birds.
(2007) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.44-6236 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Birn-Jeffery, A. V., Miller, C. E., Naish, D., Rayfield, E. J., & Hone, D. W. E. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0050555 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
The wings before the bird: an evaluation of flapping-based locomotory hypotheses in bird antecedents
Dececchi, T. A., Larsson, H. C. E., & Habib, M. B. (2016) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.2159 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Heers, A. M., Baier, D. B., Jackson, B. E., & Dial, K. P. (2016) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0153446 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Self-citationDececchi, T. A., & Larsson, H. C. E. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0022292 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
“Yet the uncertainty around its optimization along with its inability to aid with movement along thin diameter substrates (i.e. branches) make WAIR in and of itself insufficient to compensate for the lack of arboreal adaptations seen in non-avian theropods.”
BackgroundInfluentialO’Connor, J. K., & Clark, A. D. (2026) · Discover Ecology · doi:10.1007/s44396-026-00026-z
- Authors
- Dial, K. P., Jackson, B. E., & Segre, P.
- Affiliations
- University of Montana (US)
- Corresponding author
- Dial, Kenneth P.
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2008-01-23
- Volume
- 451
- Issue
- 7181
- Pages
- 985-989
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W2031748877
- Cited by
- 153
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 48
- FWCI
- 16.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Nature (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- reroDoc Digital Library (submittedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Biomimetic flight and propulsion mechanisms
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Avian ecology and behavior
- Keywords
- flight evolution, chukar, juvenile development
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Biomechanical Phenomena, Biological Evolution, Flight, Animal, Locomotion, Models, Biological, Wings, Animal, Galliformes
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review