Cited by 74Paleontology and Evolutionary BiologyEvolution and Paleontology StudiesComparative Animal Anatomy Studies

Pedal Claw Curvature in Birds, Lizards and Mesozoic Dinosaurs – Complicated Categories and Compensating for Mass-Specific and Phylogenetic Control

Open access
Birn-Jeffery, Aleksandra V., Miller, Charlotte E., Naish, Darren, Rayfield, Emily J., Hone, David W. E.·2012·PLoS ONE

Abstract

Pedal claw geometry can be used to predict behaviour in extant tetrapods and has frequently been used as an indicator of lifestyle and ecology in Mesozoic birds and other fossil reptiles, sometimes without acknowledgement of the caveat that data from other aspects of morphology and proportions also need to be considered. Variation in styles of measurement (both inner and outer claw curvature angles) has made it difficult to compare results across studies, as have over-simplified ecological categories. We sought to increase sample size in a new analysis devised to test claw geometry against ecological niche. We found that taxa from different behavioural categories overlapped extensively in claw geometry. Whilst most taxa plotted as predicted, some fossil taxa were recovered in unexpected positions. Inner and outer claw curvatures were statistically correlated, and both correlated with relative claw robusticity (mid-point claw height). We corrected for mass and phylogeny, as both likely influence claw morphology. We conclude that there is no strong mass-specific effect on claw curvature; furthermore, correlations between claw geometry and behaviour are consistent across disparate clades. By using independent contrasts to correct for phylogeny, we found little significant relationship between claw geometry and behaviour. 'Ground-dweller' claws are less curved and relatively dorsoventrally deep relative to those of other behavioural categories; beyond this it is difficult to assign an explicit category to a claw based purely on geometry.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0050555

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Pedal digit II in Archaeopteryx lacks features indicative of hyperextension that are present in troodontids and dromaeosaurids.

    “Contra recent interpretations, pedal digit II lacks features indicative of hyperextension present in troodontids and dromaeosaurids [15, 70].”

    From The ecology of Archaeopteryx (2026) · cites this paper as [70]

    The Methods and Discussion examine chiefly digit III claw curvature; the Discussion mentions a modified digit II in deinonychosaurs but does not link it to hyperextension. Searches for hyperextension and Archaeopteryx’s second digit found no passage assessing whether Archaeopteryx lacks the features described in the claim. Page numbers were unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.70)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In troodontids and dromaeosaurids, digit II phalanges are shortened and the proximoventral margin of the penultimate phalanx bears an expanded 'heel'.

    “In these taxa, digit II phalanges are shortened and the proximoventral margin of the penultimate phalanx bears an expanded 'heel' .”

    From The ecology of Archaeopteryx (2026) · cites this paper as [70]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) mentions a modified digit II in deinonychosaurs, but does not describe shortened phalanges or an expanded heel on the penultimate phalanx. The Methods (page unavailable) say the study measured claw unguals, chiefly on digit III. Searches for the heel, penultimate phalanx, and shortened digit II phalanges found no passage addressing those specific features. (LLM, conf=0.74)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [13]Baden HP (1970) Physical Properties of Nail. Journal of Investigative Dermatology 55: 115–&. 5489490
  2. [38]Witmer LM (1995) The Extant Phylogenetic Bracket and the importance of reconstructing soft tissues in fossils. In: Thomason J, editor. Functional morphology in vertebrate paleontology. New York: Cambridge University Press. 19–33.
  3. [64]Ostrom JH (1985) The meaning of Archaeopteryx. In: Hecht MK, Ostrom JH, Viohl G, Wellnhofer P, editors. The beginnings of birds: proceedings of the international Archaeopteryx conference. Eichstätt, Germany. 161–175.
  4. [67]Naish D (2000) Theropod dinosaurs in the trees: a historical review of arboreal habits amongst nonavian theropods. Archaeopteryx 18.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Birn-Jeffery, A. V., Miller, C. E., Naish, D., Rayfield, E. J., & Hone, D. W. E.
Affiliations
  • Duke University (US)
  • National Oceanography Centre (GB)
  • University of Bristol (GB)
  • University College Dublin (IE)
Corresponding author
Hone, David W. E.
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2012-12-05
Volume
7
Issue
12
Pages
e50555
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2104943208
Cited by
73
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Queen Mary Research Online (Queen Mary University of London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion)
  • RVC Research Online (Royal Veterinary College) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Comparative Animal Anatomy Studies
Keywords
Mesozoic dinosaurs, fossil birds, lizards, ecological niche, phylogenetic correction, independent contrasts
MeSH terms
Animals, Birds, Fossils, Hoof and Claw, Lizards, Phylogeny, Dinosaurs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review