The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Scaling laws of marine predator search behaviour
Open accessAbstract
Many free-ranging predators have to make foraging decisions with little, if any, knowledge of present resource distribution and availability. The optimal search strategy they should use to maximize encounter rates with prey in heterogeneous natural environments remains a largely unresolved issue in ecology. Lévy walks are specialized random walks giving rise to fractal movement trajectories that may represent an optimal solution for searching complex landscapes. However, the adaptive significance of this putative strategy in response to natural prey distributions remains untested. Here we analyse over a million movement displacements recorded from animal-attached electronic tags to show that diverse marine predators—sharks, bony fishes, sea turtles and penguins—exhibit Lévy-walk-like behaviour close to a theoretical optimum. Prey density distributions also display Lévy-like fractal patterns, suggesting response movements by predators to prey distributions. Simulations show that predators have higher encounter rates when adopting Lévy-type foraging in natural-like prey fields compared with purely random landscapes. This is consistent with the hypothesis that observed search patterns are adapted to observed statistical patterns of the landscape. This may explain why Lévy-like behaviour seems to be widespread among diverse organisms, from microbes to humans, as a ‘rule’ that evolved in response to patchy resource distributions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Scaling laws in cognitive sciences
Kello, C. T., Brown, G. D. A., Ferrer-i-Cancho, R., Holden, J. G., Linkenkaer-Hansen, K., Rhodes, T., & Van Orden, G. C. (2010) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2010.02.005 · Cited by 384
Turn costs change the value of animal search paths.
Wilson, R. P., Griffiths, I. W., Legg, P. A., Friswell, M. I., Bidder, O. R., Halsey, L. G., Lambertucci, S. A., & Shepard, E. L. C. (2013) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/ele.12149 · Cited by 142
Self-citationBestley, S., Patterson, T. A., Hindell, M. A., & Gunn, J. S. (2010) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/08-2019.1 · Cited by 78
Self-citationSousa, L. L., Queiroz, N., Mucientes, G., Humphries, N. E., & Sims, D. W. (2016) · Animal Biotelemetry · doi:10.1186/s40317-016-0099-2 · Cited by 45
Self-citationArbeider, M., Sharpe, C., Carr-Harris, C., & Moore, J. (2019) · Marine Ecology Progress Series · doi:10.3354/meps12896 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Sims, D. W., Southall, E. J., Humphries, N. E., Hays, G. C., Bradshaw, C. J. A., Pitchford, J. W., James, A., Ahmed, M. Z., Brierley, A. S., Hindell, M. A., Morritt, D., Musyl, M. K., Righton, D., Shepard, E. L. C., Wearmouth, V. J., Wilson, R. P., Witt, M. J., & Metcalfe, J. D.
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2008-02
- Volume
- 451
- Issue
- 7182
- Pages
- 1098-1102
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W2134061862
- Cited by
- 959
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 48.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Scaling laws of marine predator search behaviour. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nature06518
- The paper
- Sims, D. W., Southall, E. J., Humphries, N. E., Hays, G. C., Bradshaw, C. J. A., Pitchford, J. W., James, A., Ahmed, M. Z., Brierley, A. S., Hindell, M. A., Morritt, D., Musyl, M. K., Righton, D., Shepard, E. L. C., Wearmouth, V. J., Wilson, R. P., Witt, M. J., & Metcalfe, J. D. (2008). Scaling laws of marine predator search behaviour. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06518
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.