Cited by 78Marine and fisheries researchIchthyology and Marine BiologyMarine animal studies overview

Predicting feeding success in a migratory predator: integrating telemetry, environment, and modeling techniques

Open access
Bestley, Sophie, Patterson, Toby A., Hindell, Mark A., Gunn, John S.·2010·Ecology

Abstract

Foraging theory predicts that mobile predators should target high profitability areas with plentiful resources and minimize time spent moving between these areas. This has led to a focus in recent literature on the identification of "hotspots" important for migratory marine predators, i.e., regions where predators spend disproportionate amounts of time ostensibly due to high prey abundance; and determination of the environmental features characteristic of such areas. We investigated factors predicting foraging success in southern bluefin tuna (SBT; Thunnus maccoyii), by integrating telemetry-based feeding and movement data (n = 19 fish, length to caudal fork [LCF] = 99 +/- 3 cm) with environmental data over the scale of their annual oceanic migrations during 1998-2000. We used widely available statistical modeling techniques, generalized linear models, and generalized linear mixed models, formulated to represent feeding as a Markov process. The results showed increased feeding and predictability of feeding occurs in the coastal waters of southern Australia, providing some evidence that this area represents a fixed foraging "hotspot" for juvenile tuna during the austral summer. However, in oceanic waters southern bluefin tuna did not fit the common model of migration, but rather showed a pattern of relatively high foraging success throughout their migratory range, especially during periods of continuous travel. Interestingly, foraging "coldspots" (prolonged low-feeding periods…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1890/08-2019.1

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Substantial deployments of electronic tags on SBT have occurred, but to date tags have not been recovered from fish that have visited and returned from the spawning ground.

    “While there have been substantial deployments of electronic tags on SBT [7, 38, 39], to date tags have not been recovered from fish that have visited and returned from the spawning ground (but see [9, 40, 41]).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bestley, S., Patterson, T. A., Hindell, M. A., & Gunn, J. S.
Affiliations
  • CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere (AU)
  • University of Tasmania (AU)
Corresponding author
Bestley, Sophie
Venue
Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-08
Volume
91
Issue
8
Pages
2373-2384
ISSN
  • 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-9170
OpenAlex
W2079866945
Cited by
78
References
3
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 7
FWCI
4.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Ecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ichthyology and Marine Biology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Marine animal studies overview
Keywords
southern bluefin tuna, Thunnus maccoyii, foraging success, foraging hotspots, oceanic migration, seawater temperature, feeding behavior, juvenile tuna, generalist predators, large pelagic fish, predator-prey interactions
MeSH terms
Animals, Animal Identification Systems, Environment, Models, Biological, Predatory Behavior, Seasons, Time Factors, Tuna, Animal Migration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review