Predicting feeding success in a migratory predator: integrating telemetry, environment, and modeling techniques
Open accessAbstract
Foraging theory predicts that mobile predators should target high profitability areas with plentiful resources and minimize time spent moving between these areas. This has led to a focus in recent literature on the identification of "hotspots" important for migratory marine predators, i.e., regions where predators spend disproportionate amounts of time ostensibly due to high prey abundance; and determination of the environmental features characteristic of such areas. We investigated factors predicting foraging success in southern bluefin tuna (SBT; Thunnus maccoyii), by integrating telemetry-based feeding and movement data (n = 19 fish, length to caudal fork [LCF] = 99 +/- 3 cm) with environmental data over the scale of their annual oceanic migrations during 1998-2000. We used widely available statistical modeling techniques, generalized linear models, and generalized linear mixed models, formulated to represent feeding as a Markov process. The results showed increased feeding and predictability of feeding occurs in the coastal waters of southern Australia, providing some evidence that this area represents a fixed foraging "hotspot" for juvenile tuna during the austral summer. However, in oceanic waters southern bluefin tuna did not fit the common model of migration, but rather showed a pattern of relatively high foraging success throughout their migratory range, especially during periods of continuous travel. Interestingly, foraging "coldspots" (prolonged low-feeding periods…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Substantial deployments of electronic tags on SBT have occurred, but to date tags have not been recovered from fish that have visited and returned from the spawning ground.
“While there have been substantial deployments of electronic tags on SBT [7, 38, 39], to date tags have not been recovered from fish that have visited and returned from the spawning ground (but see [9, 40, 41]).”
From Spawning Dynamics and Size Related Trends in Reproductive Parameters of Southern Bluefin Tuna, Thunnus maccoyii (2015) · cites this paper as [7]
Cites
Putting predators back into behavioral predator–prey interactions
Lima, S. L. (2002) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(01)02393-x · Cited by 748 · see citing works
Association between bluefin tuna schools and oceanic features in the western Mediterranean
Royer, F., Fromentin, J., & Gaspar, P. (2004) · Marine Ecology Progress Series · doi:10.3354/meps269249 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Inclusion of prey data improves prediction of bluefin tuna (<i>Thunnus thynnus</i>) distribution
SCHICK, R. S., & LUTCAVAGE, M. E. (2009) · Fisheries Oceanography · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2419.2008.00499.x · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Reproduction and larval biology in tunas, and the importance of restricted area spawning grounds
Muhling, B. A., Lamkin, J. T., Alemany, F., García, A., Farley, J., Ingram, G. W., Berastegui, D. A., Reglero, P., & Carrion, R. L. (2017) · Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries · doi:10.1007/s11160-017-9471-4 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Bioenergetics, Trophic Ecology, and Niche Separation of Tunas
(2016) · Advances in Marine Biology · doi:10.1016/bs.amb.2016.06.002 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Farley, J. H., Davis, T. L. O., Bravington, M. V., Andamari, R., & Davies, C. R. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0125744 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
“While there have been substantial deployments of electronic tags on SBT [7, 38, 39], to date tags have not been recovered from fish that have visited and returned from the spawning ground (but see [9, 40, 41]).”
Background
- Authors
- Bestley, S., Patterson, T. A., Hindell, M. A., & Gunn, J. S.
- Affiliations
- CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere (AU)
- University of Tasmania (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Bestley, Sophie
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-08
- Volume
- 91
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 2373-2384
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-9170
- OpenAlex
- W2079866945
- Cited by
- 78
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 4.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- figshare.com
- Locations
- Ecology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania) (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ichthyology and Marine Biology
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Marine animal studies overview
- Keywords
- southern bluefin tuna, Thunnus maccoyii, foraging success, foraging hotspots, oceanic migration, seawater temperature, feeding behavior, juvenile tuna, generalist predators, large pelagic fish, predator-prey interactions
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Animal Identification Systems, Environment, Models, Biological, Predatory Behavior, Seasons, Time Factors, Tuna, Animal Migration
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review