Manipulation of photons at the surface of three-dimensional photonic crystals
Abstract
In three-dimensional (3D) photonic crystals, refractive-index variations with a periodicity comparable to the wavelength of the light passing through the crystal give rise to so-called photonic bandgaps, which are analogous to electronic bandgaps for electrons moving in the periodic electrostatic potential of a material's crystal structure. Such 3D photonic bandgap crystals are envisioned to become fundamental building blocks for the control and manipulation of photons in optical circuits. So far, such schemes have been pursued by embedding artificial defects and light emitters inside the crystals, making use of 3D bandgap directional effects. Here we show experimentally that photons can be controlled and manipulated even at the 'surface' of 3D photonic crystals, where 3D periodicity is terminated, establishing a new and versatile route for photon manipulation. By making use of an evanescent-mode coupling technique, we demonstrate that 3D photonic crystals possess two-dimensional surface states, and we map their band structure. We show that photons can be confined and propagate through these two-dimensional surface states, and we realize their localization at arbitrary surface points by designing artificial surface-defect structures through the formation of a surface-mode gap. Surprisingly, the quality factors of the surface-defect mode are the largest reported for 3D photonic crystal nanocavities (Q up to approximately 9,000). In addition to providing a new approach for phot…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The nontrivial topology/Berry-phases and the gapless spectrum distinguish the topological surface states from normal photonic crystal surface states.
“The nontrivial topology/Berry-phases and the gapless spectrum distinct them from normal PhC surface states.43,44”
From Type-II Dirac photons (2017) · cites this paper as [43]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 27 · Cited by 192
- Authors
- Ishizaki, K., & Noda, S.
- Affiliations
- Kyoto University (JP)
- Corresponding author
- Noda, Susumu
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2009-07
- Volume
- 460
- Issue
- 7253
- Pages
- 367-370
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W2080357626
- Cited by
- 192
- References
- 27
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 23
- FWCI
- 13.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Nature (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) (submittedVersion)
- Kyoto University Research Information Repository (Kyoto University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Photonic Crystals and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Topological Materials and Phenomena
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials › Metamaterials and Metasurfaces Applications
- Keywords
- photonic crystals, photonic band gap, two-dimensional surface states, photon localization, photonic band structure, surface defects, photon manipulation, optical circuits, quality factor enhancement, photonic crystal nanocavities, whispering gallery modes, photonic crystal waveguides
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review