The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Rationally tuning the reduction potential of a single cupredoxin beyond the natural range
Open accessAbstract
Redox processes are at the heart of numerous functions in chemistry and biology, from long-range electron transfer in photosynthesis and respiration to catalysis in industrial and fuel cell research. These functions are accomplished in nature by only a limited number of redox-active agents. A long-standing issue in these fields is how redox potentials are fine-tuned over a broad range with little change to the redox-active site or electron-transfer properties. Resolving this issue will not only advance our fundamental understanding of the roles of long-range, non-covalent interactions in redox processes, but also allow for design of redox-active proteins having tailor-made redox potentials for applications such as artificial photosynthetic centres or fuel cell catalysts for energy conversion. Here we show that two important secondary coordination sphere interactions, hydrophobicity and hydrogen-bonding, are capable of tuning the reduction potential of the cupredoxin azurin over a 700 mV range, surpassing the highest and lowest reduction potentials reported for any mononuclear cupredoxin, without perturbing the metal binding site beyond what is typical for the cupredoxin family of proteins. We also demonstrate that the effects of individual structural features are additive and that redox potential tuning of azurin is now predictable across the full range of cupredoxin potentials.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Copper Active Sites in Biology
Solomon, E. I., Heppner, D. E., Johnston, E. M., Ginsbach, J. W., Cirera, J., Qayyum, M., Kieber-Emmons, M. T., Kjaergaard, C. H., Hadt, R. G., & Tian, L. (2014) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr400327t · Cited by 1,751
Artificial Metalloenzymes: Reaction Scope and Optimization Strategies
Schwizer, F., Okamoto, Y., Heinisch, T., Gu, Y., Pellizzoni, M. M., Lebrun, V., Reuter, R., Köhler, V., Lewis, J. C., & Ward, T. R. (2018) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00014 · Cited by 831
Electron transfer and reaction mechanism of laccases
Jones, S. M., & Solomon, E. I. (2015) · Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s00018-014-1826-6 · Cited by 623
Mediatorless high-power glucose biofuel cells based on compressed carbon nanotube-enzyme electrodes
Zebda, A., Gondran, C., Le Goff, A., Holzinger, M., Cinquin, P., & Cosnier, S. (2011) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms1365 · Cited by 615
Using nature’s blueprint to expand catalysis with Earth-abundant metals
Bullock, R. M., Chen, J. G., Gagliardi, L., Chirik, P. J., Farha, O. K., Hendon, C. H., Jones, C. W., Keith, J. A., Klosin, J., Minteer, S. D., et al. (2020) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abc3183 · Cited by 592
Metadata
- Authors
- Marshall, N. M., Garner, D. K., Wilson, T. D., Gao, Y.-G., Robinson, H., Nilges, M. J., & Lu, Y.
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2009-11
- Volume
- 462
- Issue
- 7269
- Pages
- 113-116
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W1994887179
- Cited by
- 303
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rationally tuning the reduction potential of a single cupredoxin beyond the natural range. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nature08551
- The paper
- Marshall, N. M., Garner, D. K., Wilson, T. D., Gao, Y.-G., Robinson, H., Nilges, M. J., & Lu, Y. (2009). Rationally tuning the reduction potential of a single cupredoxin beyond the natural range. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08551
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.