Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,017

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Arthropod relationships revealed by phylogenomic analysis of nuclear protein-coding sequences

Regier, Jerome C., Shultz, Jeffrey W., Zwick, Andreas, Hussey, April, Ball, Bernard, Wetzer, Regina, Martin, Joel W., Cunningham, Clifford W.·2010·Nature
DOI 10.1038/nature08742
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature08742

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 40

  1. Abele, L. G., Kim, W. & Felgenhauer, B. E. Molecular evidence for inclusion of the phylum Pentastomida in the Crustacea. Mol. Biol. Evol. 6, 685–691 (1989)
  2. Friedrich, M. & Tautz, D. Ribosomal DNA phylogeny of the major extant arthropod classes and the evolution of myriapods. Nature 376, 165–167 (1995) · DOI · Paper page
  3. Regier, J. C. & Shultz, J. W. Molecular phylogeny of the major arthropod groups indicates polyphyly of crustaceans and a new hypothesis for the origin of hexapods. Mol. Biol. Evol. 14, 902–913 (1997) · DOI
  4. Giribet, G., Edgecombe, G. D. & Wheeler, W. C. Arthropod phylogeny based on eight molecular loci and morphology. Nature 413, 157–161 (2001) · DOI · Paper page
  5. Hwang, U. W., Friedrich, M., Tautz, D., Park, C. J. & Kim, W. Mitochondrial protein phylogeny joins myriapods with chelicerates. Nature 413, 154–157 (2001) · DOI · Paper page
  6. Mallatt, J. & Giribet, G. Further use of nearly complete 28S and 18S rRNA genes to classify Ecdysozoa: 37 more arthropods and a kinorhynch. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 40, 772–794 (2006) · DOI · Paper page
  7. Budd, G. E. & Telford, M. J. The origin and evolution of arthropods. Nature 457, 812–817 (2009) · DOI
  8. Boore, J. L., Lavrov, D. V. & Brown, W. M. Gene translocation links insects and crustaceans. Nature 392, 667–668 (1998) · DOI
  9. Phillips, M. J., Delsuc, F. & Penny, D. Genome-scale phylogeny and the detection of systematic biases. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21, 1455–1458 (2004) · DOI · Paper page
  10. Rota-Stabelli, O. & Telford, M. J. A multi criterion approach for the selection of optimal outgroups in phylogeny: recovering some support for Mandibulata over Myriochelata using mitogenomics. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 48, 103–111 (2008) · DOI
  11. Snodgrass, R. E. Evolution of the Annelida, Onychophora and Arthropoda (Smithsonian Inst. Press, 1938)
  12. Mallatt, J. M., Garey, J. R. & Shultz, J. W. Ecdysozoan phylogeny and Bayesian inference: first use of nearly complete 28S and 18S rRNA gene sequences to classify the arthropods and their kin. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 31, 178–191 (2004) · DOI · Paper page
  13. Timmermans, M. J. T. N., Roelofs, D., Mariën, J. & Van Straalen, N. M. Revealing pancrustacean relationships: phylogenetic analysis of ribosomal protein genes places Collembola (springtails) in a monophyletic Hexapoda and reinforces the discrepancy between mitochondrial and nuclear DNA markers. BMC Evol. Biol. 8, 83 (2008) · DOI
  14. Philippe, H. et al. Phylogenomics revives traditional views on deep animal relationships. Curr. Biol. 19, 706–712 (2009) · DOI · Paper page
  15. Regier, J. C. et al. Resolving arthropod phylogeny: exploring phylogenetic signal within 41 kb of protein-coding nuclear gene sequence. Syst. Biol. 57, 920–938 (2008) · DOI
  16. Holder, M. T., Zwickl, D. J. & Dessimoz, C. Evaluating the robustness of phylogenetic methods to among-site variability in substitution processes. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 363, 4013–4021 (2008) · DOI
  17. Seo, T. & Kishino, H. Statistical comparison of nucleotide, amino acid, and codon substitution models for evolutionary analysis of protein-coding sequences. Syst. Biol. 58, 199–210 (2009) · DOI
  18. Podsiadlowski, L., Braband, A. & Mayer, G. The complete mitochondrial genome of the onychophoran Epiperipatus biolleyi reveals a unique transfer RNA set and provides further support for the Ecdysozoa hypothesis. Mol. Biol. Evol. 25, 42–51 (2008) · DOI
  19. Shultz, J. W. A phylogenetic analysis of the arachnid orders based on morphological characters. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 150, 221–265 (2007) · DOI · Paper page
  20. Schram, F. R. ed. Crustacean Phylogeny (Balkema, 1983)
  21. Fanenbruck, M., Harzsch, S. & Wagele, J. The brain of the Remipedia (Crustacea) and an alternative hypothesis on their phylogenetic relationships. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 3868–3873 (2004) · DOI
  22. Harzsch, S. Neurophylogeny: architecture of the nervous system and a fresh view on arthropod phyologeny. Integr. Comp. Biol. 46, 162–194 (2006) · DOI
  23. Boxshall, G. A. Crustacean classification: on-going controversies and unresolved problems. Zootaxa 1668, 313–325 (2007) · DOI
  24. Carapelli, A., Liò, P., Nardi, F., van der Wath, E. & Frati, F. Phylogenetic analysis of mitochondrial protein coding genes confirms the reciprocal paraphyly of Hexapoda and Crustacea. BMC Evol. Biol. 7 (suppl. 2). S8 (2007) · DOI
  25. Hennig, W. Insect Phylogeny (Wiley, 1981)
  26. Zrzavy, J., Hypsa, V. & Vlaskova, M. in Arthropod Relationships (eds Fortey, R. A. & Thomas, R. H.) 97–107 (Chapman and Hall, 1997)
  27. Gai, Y.-H., Song, D., Sun, H. & Zhou, K. Myriapod monophyly and relationships among myriapod classes based on nearly complete 28S and 18S rDNA sequences. Zool. Sci. 23, 1101–1108 (2006) · DOI
  28. Zwickl, D. J. Genetic Algorithm Approaches for the Phylogenetic Analysis of Large Biological Sequence Datasets under the Maximum Likelihood Criterion. PhD thesis, Univ. Texas Austin (2006)
  29. Goldman, N., Thorne, J. L. & Jones, D. T. Using evolutionary trees in protein secondary structure prediction and other comparative sequence analyses. J. Mol. Biol. 263, 196–208 (1996) · DOI
  30. Remm, M., Storm, C. E. & Sonnhammer, E. L. Automatic clustering of orthologs and in-paralogs from pairwise species comparisons. J. Mol. Biol. 314, 1041–1052 (2001) · DOI · Paper page
  31. Regier, J. C. & Shi, D. Increased yield of PCR product from degenerate primers with nondegenerate, nonhomologous 5′ tails. Biotechniques 38, 34–38 (2005) · DOI
  32. Staden, R., Judge, D. & Bonfield, J. Sequence assembly and finishing methods. Methods Biochem. Anal. 43, 303–322 (2001) · DOI
  33. Smith, S. W., Overbeck, R., Woese, C. R., Gilbert, W. & Gillevet, P. M. The genetic data environment and expandable GUI for multiple sequence analysis. Comp. Appl. Biosci. 10, 671–675 (1994)
  34. Katoh, K., Kuma, K., Toh, H. & Miyata, T. MAFFT version 5: improvement in accuracy of multiple sequence alignment. Nucleic Acids Res. 33, 511–518 (2005) · DOI · Paper page
  35. Huelsenbeck, J. P. & Ronquist, F. MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Bioinformatics 17, 754–755 (2001) · DOI · Paper page
  36. Ronquist, F. & Huelsenbeck, J. P. MRBAYES 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19, 1572–1574 (2003) · DOI · Paper page
  37. Altekar, G., Dwarkadas, S., Huelsenbeck, J. P. & Ronquist, F. Parallel Metropolis-coupled Markov chain Monte Carlo for Bayesian phylogenetic inference. Bioinformatics 20, 407–415 (2004) · DOI · Paper page
  38. Regier, J. C. & Shultz, J. W. Elongation factor-2: a useful gene for arthropod phylogenetics. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 20, 136–148 (2001) · DOI
  39. Cummings, M. & Huskamp, J. Grid computing. EDUCAUSE Rev. 40, 116–117 (2005)
  40. Bazinet, A. L. & Cummings, M. C. in Distributed & Grid Computing–Science Made Transparent for Everyone. Principles, Applications and Supporting Communities (ed. Weber, M. H. W.) 2–13 (Tectum, 2009)

Cited by

See all 1,017

Metadata

Authors
Regier, J. C., Shultz, J. W., Zwick, A., Hussey, A., Ball, B., Wetzer, R., Martin, J. W., & Cunningham, C. W.
Venue
Nature
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2010-02
Volume
463
Issue
7284
Pages
1079-1083
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
DOI
10.1038/nature08742
OpenAlex
W2141506506
Cited by
1,017
References
1
FWCI
101.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.