The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Antagonistic coevolution accelerates molecular evolution
Open accessAbstract
The Red Queen hypothesis proposes that coevolution of interacting species (such as hosts and parasites) should drive molecular evolution through continual natural selection for adaptation and counter-adaptation. Although the divergence observed at some host-resistance and parasite-infectivity genes is consistent with this, the long time periods typically required to study coevolution have so far prevented any direct empirical test. Here we show, using experimental populations of the bacterium Pseudomonas fluorescens SBW25 and its viral parasite, phage Φ2 (refs 10, 11), that the rate of molecular evolution in the phage was far higher when both bacterium and phage coevolved with each other than when phage evolved against a constant host genotype. Coevolution also resulted in far greater genetic divergence between replicate populations, which was correlated with the range of hosts that coevolved phage were able to infect. Consistent with this, the most rapidly evolving phage genes under coevolution were those involved in host infection. These results demonstrate, at both the genomic and phenotypic level, that antagonistic coevolution is a cause of rapid and divergent evolution, and is likely to be a major driver of evolutionary change within species.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Excoffier, L., Smouse, P. E., & Quattro, J. M. (1992) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/131.2.479 · Cited by 13,929
Evolution of genes and genomes on the Drosophila phylogeny
Drosophila 12 Genomes Consortium (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06341 · Cited by 2,010
Cited by
Emerging fungal threats to animal, plant and ecosystem health
Fisher, M. C., Henk, D. A., Briggs, C. J., Brownstein, J. S., Madoff, L. C., McCraw, S. L., & Gurr, S. J. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10947 · Cited by 3,310
Revenge of the phages: defeating bacterial defences
Samson, J. E., Magadán, A. H., Sabri, M., & Moineau, S. (2013) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro3096 · Cited by 698
The phage‐host arms race: Shaping the evolution of microbes
Stern, A., & Sorek, R. (2011) · BioEssays · doi:10.1002/bies.201000071 · Cited by 527
Evolution and coevolution in mutualistic networks
Guimarães Jr, P. R., Jordano, P., & Thompson, J. N. (2011) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01649.x · Cited by 355
Evolutionary insights into host–pathogen interactions from mammalian sequence data
Sironi, M., Cagliani, R., Forni, D., & Clerici, M. (2015) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3905 · Cited by 302
Metadata
- Authors
- Paterson, S., Vogwill, T., Buckling, A., Benmayor, R., Spiers, A. J., Thomson, N. R., Quail, M., Smith, F., Walker, D., Libberton, B., Fenton, A., Hall, N., & Brockhurst, M. A.
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2010-02-24
- Volume
- 464
- Issue
- 7286
- Pages
- 275-278
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W2067108995
- Cited by
- 546
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 22.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Antagonistic coevolution accelerates molecular evolution. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nature08798
- The paper
- Paterson, S., Vogwill, T., Buckling, A., Benmayor, R., Spiers, A. J., Thomson, N. R., Quail, M., Smith, F., Walker, D., Libberton, B., Fenton, A., Hall, N., & Brockhurst, M. A. (2010). Antagonistic coevolution accelerates molecular evolution. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08798
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.