The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Nonlinear atom interferometer surpasses classical precision limit
Open accessAbstract
Interference is fundamental to wave dynamics and quantum mechanics. The quantum wave properties of particles are exploited in metrology using atom interferometers, allowing for high-precision inertia measurements. Furthermore, the state-of-the-art time standard is based on an interferometric technique known as Ramsey spectroscopy. However, the precision of an interferometer is limited by classical statistics owing to the finite number of atoms used to deduce the quantity of interest. Here we show experimentally that the classical precision limit can be surpassed using nonlinear atom interferometry with a Bose–Einstein condensate. Controlled interactions between the atoms lead to non-classical entangled states within the interferometer; this represents an alternative approach to the use of non-classical input states. Extending quantum interferometry to the regime of large atom number, we find that phase sensitivity is enhanced by 15 per cent relative to that in an ideal classical measurement. Our nonlinear atomic beam splitter follows the ‘one-axis-twisting’ scheme and implements interaction control using a narrow Feshbach resonance. We perform noise tomography of the quantum state within the interferometer and detect coherent spin squeezing with a squeezing factor of -8.2 dB (refs 11–15). The results provide information on the many-particle quantum state, and imply the entanglement of 170 atoms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Entanglement, Nonlinear Dynamics, and the Heisenberg Limit
Pezzé, L., & Smerzi, A. (2009) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.102.100401 · Cited by 880
Cited by
Ludlow, A. D., Boyd, M. M., Ye, J., Peik, E., & Schmidt, P. O. (2015) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.87.637 · Cited by 2,385
Models of wave-function collapse, underlying theories, and experimental tests
Bassi, A., Lochan, K., Satin, S., Singh, T. P., & Ulbricht, H. (2013) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.85.471 · Cited by 1,170
Atom-chip-based generation of entanglement for quantum metrology
Riedel, M. F., Böhi, P., Li, Y., Hänsch, T. W., Sinatra, A., & Treutlein, P. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08988 · Cited by 874
Quantum metrology from a quantum information science perspective
Tóth, G., & Apellaniz, I. (2014) · Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical · doi:10.1088/1751-8113/47/42/424006 · Cited by 862
Entanglement Generated by Dissipation and Steady State Entanglement of Two Macroscopic Objects
Krauter, H., Muschik, C. A., Jensen, K., Wasilewski, W., Petersen, J. M., Cirac, J. I., & Polzik, E. S. (2011) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.107.080503 · Cited by 586
Metadata
- Authors
- Gross, C., Zibold, T., Nicklas, E., Estève, J., & Oberthaler, M. K.
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2010-03-31
- Volume
- 464
- Issue
- 7292
- Pages
- 1165-1169
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W2062558324
- Cited by
- 949
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 39.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nonlinear atom interferometer surpasses classical precision limit. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nature08919
- The paper
- Gross, C., Zibold, T., Nicklas, E., Estève, J., & Oberthaler, M. K. (2010). Nonlinear atom interferometer surpasses classical precision limit. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08919
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.