Models of wave-function collapse, underlying theories, and experimental tests
Open accessAbstract
Quantum mechanics is an extremely successful theory that agrees with every experimental test. However, the principle of linear superposition, a central tenet of the theory, apparently contradicts a commonplace observation: macroscopic objects are never found in a linear superposition of position states. Moreover, the theory does not explain why during a quantum measurement, deterministic evolution is replaced by probabilistic evolution, whose random outcomes obey the Born probability rule. In this article a review is given of an experimentally falsifiable phenomenological proposal, known as continuous spontaneous collapse: a stochastic nonlinear modification of the Schr\"odinger equation, which resolves these problems, while giving the same experimental results as quantum theory in the microscopic regime. Two underlying theories for this phenomenology are reviewed: trace dynamics and gravity-induced collapse. As the macroscopic scale is approached, predictions of this proposal begin to differ appreciably from those of quantum theory and are being confronted by ongoing laboratory experiments that include molecular interferometry and optomechanics. These experiments, which test the validity of linear superposition for large systems, are reviewed here, and their technical challenges, current results, and future prospects summarized. It is likely that over the next two decades or so, these experiments can verify or rule out the proposed stochastic modification of quantum theory.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Assumption (Q) is manifestly violated by theories that postulate a modification of standard quantum mechanics, such as spontaneous and gravity-induced collapse models.
“Assumption (Q) is manifestly violated by theories that postulate a modification of standard quantum mechanics, such as spontaneous16–20 and gravity-induced21–23 collapse models (cf. 24 for a review).”
From Quantum theory cannot consistently describe the use of itself (2018) · cites this paper as [24]
The mechanism would normally induce heating of the quantum system, unless the involved gravitational degrees of freedom do not carry energy.
“It should also be mentioned that such a mechanism would normally induce heating of the quantum system at hand-which effect sets rather stringent bounds on the collapse models [78][79][80]-, unless the involved gravitational degrees of freedom do not carry energy.”
From Conformal Cyclic Cosmology, gravitational entropy and quantum information (2023) · cites this paper as [79]
Cites
Electric Field Effect in Atomically Thin Carbon Films
Novoselov, K. S., Geim, A. K., Morozov, S. V., Jiang, D., Zhang, Y., Dubonos, S. V., Grigorieva, I. V., & Firsov, A. A. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1102896 · Cited by 66,834 · see citing works
Speakable and Unspeakable in Quatum Mechanics
Bell, J. S., & Mermin, N. D. (1988) · Physics Today · doi:10.1063/1.2811599 · Cited by 2,985 · see citing works
Geonium theory: Physics of a single electron or ion in a Penning trap
Brown, L. S., & Gabrielse, G. (1986) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.58.233 · Cited by 1,367 · cited 1× · see citing works
“It has been used for studies of fundamental physics such as the precise evaluation of physical constants (Brown and Gabrielse, 1986), for quantum information processing with one or many ions (Duan and Monroe, 2010; Leibfried et al., 2003; Singer et al., 2010), in chemical physics to investigate the…”
MethodQuantum equilibrium and the origin of absolute uncertainty
D�rr, D., Goldstein, S., & Zangh�, N. (1992) · Journal of Statistical Physics · doi:10.1007/bf01049004 · Cited by 712 · see citing works
Consistent interpretations of quantum mechanics
Omnès, R. (1992) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.64.339 · Cited by 648 · see citing works
<i>Colloquium</i>: Quantum networks with trapped ions
Duan, L.-M., & Monroe, C. (2010) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.82.1209 · Cited by 530 · see citing works
Gravitation and quantum mechanics of macroscopic objects
Karolyhazy, F. (1966) · Il Nuovo Cimento A · doi:10.1007/bf02717926 · Cited by 530 · see citing works
Weinberg's nonlinear quantum mechanics and the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox.
Polchinski, J. (1991) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.66.397 · Cited by 312 · see citing works
On spontaneous wave function collapse and quantum field theory
Tumulka, R. (2006) · Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspa.2005.1636 · Cited by 144 · cited 2× · see citing works
“The Tumulka-GRW model (Tumulka, 2006a) and the CSL model belong to this group.”
BackgroundMethodWeinberg, S. (2012) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.85.062116 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Quantum theory cannot consistently describe the use of itself
Frauchiger, D., & Renner, R. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-05739-8 · Cited by 333 · see citing works
Underground test of gravity-related wave function collapse
Donadi, S., Piscicchia, K., Curceanu, C., Diósi, L., Laubenstein, M., & Bassi, A. (2021) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/s41567-020-1008-4 · Cited by 160 · see citing works
Self-citationQuantum theory and determinism
Vaidman, L. (2014) · Quantum Studies: Mathematics and Foundations · doi:10.1007/s40509-014-0008-4 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Conformal Cyclic Cosmology, gravitational entropy and quantum information
Eckstein, M. (2023) · General Relativity and Gravitation · doi:10.1007/s10714-023-03070-2 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
- Authors
- Bassi, A., Lochan, K., Satin, S., Singh, T. P., & Ulbricht, H.
- Affiliations
- University of Trieste (IT)
- Tata Institute of Fundamental Research (IN)
- Venue
- Reviews of Modern Physics
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2013-04-02
- Volume
- 85
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 471-527
- ISSN
- 0034-6861 (ISSN-L)
- 1539-0756
- OpenAlex
- W2122233615
- Cited by
- 1,170
- References
- 10
- Citations by year
- 2026: 73 · 2025: 123 · 2024: 84 · 2023: 117 · 2022: 85 · 2021: 104 · 2020: 117 · 2019: 94 · 2018: 71 · 2017: 87 · 2016: 67 · 2015: 58 · 2014: 53 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 17
- FWCI
- 34.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Reviews of Modern Physics (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- ArTS Archivio della ricerca di Trieste (University of Trieste https://www.units.it/) (submittedVersion)
- ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Keywords
- wave function collapse, linear superposition, measurement problem, Born rule, trace dynamics, macroscopic superposition, molecular interferometry, optomechanics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review