Cited by 1,170Quantum Mechanics and ApplicationsNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesQuantum Information and Cryptography

Models of wave-function collapse, underlying theories, and experimental tests

Open access
Bassi, Angelo, Lochan, Kinjalk, Satin, Seema, Singh, Tejinder P., Ulbricht, Hendrik·2013·Reviews of Modern Physics

Abstract

Quantum mechanics is an extremely successful theory that agrees with every experimental test. However, the principle of linear superposition, a central tenet of the theory, apparently contradicts a commonplace observation: macroscopic objects are never found in a linear superposition of position states. Moreover, the theory does not explain why during a quantum measurement, deterministic evolution is replaced by probabilistic evolution, whose random outcomes obey the Born probability rule. In this article a review is given of an experimentally falsifiable phenomenological proposal, known as continuous spontaneous collapse: a stochastic nonlinear modification of the Schr\"odinger equation, which resolves these problems, while giving the same experimental results as quantum theory in the microscopic regime. Two underlying theories for this phenomenology are reviewed: trace dynamics and gravity-induced collapse. As the macroscopic scale is approached, predictions of this proposal begin to differ appreciably from those of quantum theory and are being confronted by ongoing laboratory experiments that include molecular interferometry and optomechanics. These experiments, which test the validity of linear superposition for large systems, are reviewed here, and their technical challenges, current results, and future prospects summarized. It is likely that over the next two decades or so, these experiments can verify or rule out the proposed stochastic modification of quantum theory.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/revmodphys.85.471

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Assumption (Q) is manifestly violated by theories that postulate a modification of standard quantum mechanics, such as spontaneous and gravity-induced collapse models.

    “Assumption (Q) is manifestly violated by theories that postulate a modification of standard quantum mechanics, such as spontaneous16–20 and gravity-induced21–23 collapse models (cf. 24 for a review).”
  • The mechanism would normally induce heating of the quantum system, unless the involved gravitational degrees of freedom do not carry energy.

    “It should also be mentioned that such a mechanism would normally induce heating of the quantum system at hand-which effect sets rather stringent bounds on the collapse models [78][79][80]-, unless the involved gravitational degrees of freedom do not carry energy.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bassi, A., Lochan, K., Satin, S., Singh, T. P., & Ulbricht, H.
Affiliations
  • University of Trieste (IT)
  • Tata Institute of Fundamental Research (IN)
Venue
Reviews of Modern Physics
Published
2013-04-02
Volume
85
Issue
2
Pages
471-527
ISSN
  • 0034-6861 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-0756
OpenAlex
W2122233615
Cited by
1,170
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 73 · 2025: 123 · 2024: 84 · 2023: 117 · 2022: 85 · 2021: 104 · 2020: 117 · 2019: 94 · 2018: 71 · 2017: 87 · 2016: 67 · 2015: 58 · 2014: 53 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 17
FWCI
34.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Reviews of Modern Physics (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • ArTS Archivio della ricerca di Trieste (University of Trieste https://www.units.it/) (submittedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
Keywords
wave function collapse, linear superposition, measurement problem, Born rule, trace dynamics, macroscopic superposition, molecular interferometry, optomechanics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review