The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Molecular robots guided by prescriptive landscapes
Open accessAbstract
Traditional robots rely for their function on computing, to store internal representations of their goals and environment and to coordinate sensing and any actuation of components required in response. Moving robotics to the single-molecule level is possible in principle, but requires facing the limited ability of individual molecules to store complex information and programs. One strategy to overcome this problem is to use systems that can obtain complex behaviour from the interaction of simple robots with their environment. A first step in this direction was the development of DNA walkers, which have developed from being non-autonomous to being capable of directed but brief motion on one-dimensional tracks. Here we demonstrate that previously developed random walkers—so-called molecular spiders that comprise a streptavidin molecule as an inert ‘body’ and three deoxyribozymes as catalytic ‘legs’—show elementary robotic behaviour when interacting with a precisely defined environment. Single-molecule microscopy observations confirm that such walkers achieve directional movement by sensing and modifying tracks of substrate molecules laid out on a two-dimensional DNA origami landscape. When using appropriately designed DNA origami, the molecular spiders autonomously carry out sequences of actions such as ‘start’, ‘follow’, ‘turn’ and ‘stop’. We anticipate that this strategy will result in more complex robotic behaviour at the molecular level if additional control mechanisms are incorporated. One example might be interactions between multiple molecular robots leading to collective behaviour; another might be the ability to read and transform secondary cues on the DNA origami landscape as a means of implementing Turing-universal algorithmic behaviour.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
On computable numbers, with an application to the entscheidungsproblem
Turing, A. M. (1937) · Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society · doi:10.1112/plms/s2-42.1.230 · Cited by 8,283
The thermodynamics of computation—a review
Bennett, C. H. (1982) · International Journal of Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1007/bf02084158 · Cited by 2,006
Cited by
Seeman, N. C., & Sleiman, H. F. (2017) · Nature Reviews Materials · doi:10.1038/natrevmats.2017.68 · Cited by 1,875
Dynamic DNA nanotechnology using strand-displacement reactions
Zhang, D. Y., & Seelig, G. (2011) · Nature Chemistry · doi:10.1038/nchem.957 · Cited by 1,785
Analysis of aptamer discovery and technology
Dunn, M. R., Jimenez, R. M., & Chaput, J. C. (2017) · Nature Reviews Chemistry · doi:10.1038/s41570-017-0076 · Cited by 938
Kassem, S., van Leeuwen, T., Lubbe, A. S., Wilson, M. R., Feringa, B. L., & Leigh, D. A. (2017) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c7cs00245a · Cited by 934
Principles and Applications of Nucleic Acid Strand Displacement Reactions
Simmel, F. C., Yurke, B., & Singh, H. R. (2019) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00580 · Cited by 792
Metadata
- Authors
- Lund, K., Manzo, A. J., Dabby, N., Michelotti, N., Johnson-Buck, A., Nangreave, J., Taylor, S., Pei, R., Stojanovic, M. N., Walter, N. G., Winfree, E., & Yan, H.
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2010-05
- Volume
- 465
- Issue
- 7295
- Pages
- 206-210
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W1993933078
- Cited by
- 940
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 32.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Molecular robots guided by prescriptive landscapes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nature09012
- The paper
- Lund, K., Manzo, A. J., Dabby, N., Michelotti, N., Johnson-Buck, A., Nangreave, J., Taylor, S., Pei, R., Stojanovic, M. N., Walter, N. G., Winfree, E., & Yan, H. (2010). Molecular robots guided by prescriptive landscapes. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09012
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.