Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 427

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Polyreactivity increases the apparent affinity of anti-HIV antibodies by heteroligation

Open access
Mouquet, Hugo, Scheid, Johannes F., Zoller, Markus J., Krogsgaard, Michelle, Ott, Rene G., Shukair, Shetha, Artyomov, Maxim N., Pietzsch, John, Connors, Mark, Pereyra, Florencia, Walker, Bruce D., Ho, David D., Wilson, Patrick C., Seaman, Michael S., Eisen, Herman N., Chakraborty, Arup K., Hope, Thomas J., Ravetch, Jeffrey V., Wardemann, Hedda, Nussenzweig, Michel C.·2010·Nature

Abstract

During immune responses, antibodies are selected for their ability to bind to foreign antigens with high affinity, in part by their ability to undergo homotypic bivalent binding. However, this type of binding is not always possible. For example, the small number of gp140 glycoprotein spikes displayed on the surface of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) disfavours homotypic bivalent antibody binding. Here we show that during the human antibody response to HIV, somatic mutations that increase antibody affinity also increase breadth and neutralizing potency. Surprisingly, the responding naive and memory B cells produce polyreactive antibodies, which are capable of bivalent heteroligation between one high-affinity anti-HIV-gp140 combining site and a second low-affinity site on another molecular structure on HIV. Although cross-reactivity to self-antigens or polyreactivity is strongly selected against during B-cell development, it is a common serologic feature of certain infections in humans, including HIV, Epstein-Barr virus and hepatitis C virus. Seventy-five per cent of the 134 monoclonal anti-HIV-gp140 antibodies cloned from six patients with high titres of neutralizing antibodies are polyreactive. Despite the low affinity of the polyreactive combining site, heteroligation demonstrably increases the apparent affinity of polyreactive antibodies to HIV.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature09385

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 427

Metadata

Authors
Mouquet, H., Scheid, J. F., Zoller, M. J., Krogsgaard, M., Ott, R. G., Shukair, S., Artyomov, M. N., Pietzsch, J., Connors, M., Pereyra, F., Walker, B. D., Ho, D. D., Wilson, P. C., Seaman, M. S., Eisen, H. N., Chakraborty, A. K., Hope, T. J., Ravetch, J. V., Wardemann, H., & Nussenzweig, M. C.
Venue
Nature
Published
2010-09-30
Volume
467
Issue
7315
Pages
591-595
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W1981981290
Cited by
427
References
0
FWCI
14.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Polyreactivity increases the apparent affinity of anti-HIV antibodies by heteroligation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nature09385
The paper
Mouquet, H., Scheid, J. F., Zoller, M. J., Krogsgaard, M., Ott, R. G., Shukair, S., Artyomov, M. N., Pietzsch, J., Connors, M., Pereyra, F., Walker, B. D., Ho, D. D., Wilson, P. C., Seaman, M. S., Eisen, H. N., Chakraborty, A. K., Hope, T. J., Ravetch, J. V., Wardemann, H., & Nussenzweig, M. C. (2010). Polyreactivity increases the apparent affinity of anti-HIV antibodies by heteroligation. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09385

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.